Soft Robotics Technologies to Address Shortcomings in Today ’ s Minimally Invasive Surgery : The STIFF-FLOP Approach

Most devices for single-site or natural orifice transluminal surgery are very application specific and, hence, capable of effectively carrying out specific surgical tasks only. However, most of these instruments are rigid, lack a sufficient number of degrees of freedom (DOFs), and/or are incapable of modifying their mechanical properties based on the tasks to be performed. The current philosophy in commercial instrument design is mainly focused on creating minimally invasive surgical systems using rigid tools equipped with dexterous tips. Only few research efforts are aimed at developing flexible surgical systems, with many DOFs or even continuum kinematics. The authors propose a radical change in surgical instrument design: away from rigid tools toward a new concept of soft and stiffness-controllable instruments. Inspired by biology, we envision creating such soft and stiffnesscontrollable medical devices using the octopus as a model. The octopus presents all the capabilities requested and can be viewed as a precious source of inspiration. Several soft technologies are suitable for meeting the aforementioned capabilities, and in this article a brief review of the most promising ones is presented. Then we illustrate how specific technologies can be applied in the design of a novel manipulator for flexible surgery by discussing its potential and by presenting feasibility tests of a prototype responding to this new design philosophy. Our aim is to investigate the feasibility of applying these technologies in the field of minimally invasive surgery and at the same time to stimulate the creativeness of others who could take the proposed concepts further to achieve novel solutions and generate specific application scenarios for the devised technologies.

[1]  D A Hobson,et al.  The vacuum splint: an aid in emergency splinting of fractures. , 1973, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[2]  Koichi Suzumori,et al.  Flexible microactuator for miniature robots , 1991, [1991] Proceedings. IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems.

[3]  R.H. Sturges,et al.  A Flexible, Tendon-Controlled Device for Endoscopy , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Joel W. Burdick,et al.  The Development of a Robotic Endoscope , 1995, ISER.

[5]  M Hashmonai,et al.  Sling retraction of the falciform ligament to ameliorate exposure in laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery. , 1996, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[6]  Andrea J. Liu,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics: Jamming is not just cool any more , 1998, Nature.

[7]  Melek Yalcintas,et al.  Magnetorheological and electrorheological materials in adaptive structures and their performance comparison , 1999 .

[8]  T. Tadaki,et al.  Shape Memory Alloys , 2002 .

[9]  Ian A. Gravagne,et al.  Manipulability, force, and compliance analysis for planar continuum manipulators , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Analysis and development of locomotion devices for the gastrointestinal tract , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  David Lichodziejewski,et al.  An Inflatable Rigidizable Truss Structure Based on New Sub-Tg Polyurethane Composites , 2002 .

[12]  Gyula Greschik,et al.  Testing of an Inflation-Deployed Sub-Tg Rigidized Support Structure for a Planar Membrane Waveguide Antenna , 2005 .

[13]  P. Breedveld,et al.  A new, easily miniaturized steerable endoscope , 2005, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[14]  Ken Masamune,et al.  Rigid-Flexible Outer Sheath Model Using Slider Linkage Locking Mechanism and Air Pressure for Endoscopic Surgery , 2006, MICCAI.

[15]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  The use of active materials for machining processes : A review , 2007 .

[16]  J. Madden,et al.  Polymer artificial muscles , 2007 .

[17]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research , 2008 .

[18]  H. Choset,et al.  Highly articulated robotic probe for minimally invasive surgery , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  Mechanics of Precurved-Tube Continuum Robots , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[20]  Alain Delchambre,et al.  Towards flexible medical instruments: Review of flexible fluidic actuators , 2009 .

[21]  Geoffrey M. Spinks,et al.  Conductive Electroactive Polymers: Intelligent Polymer Systems , 2009 .

[22]  Guillaume Morel,et al.  Robotic Hand-Held Surgical Device: Evaluation of End-Effector's Kinematics and Development of Proof-of-Concept Prototypes , 2010, MICCAI.

[23]  Martin L. Culpepper,et al.  Modeling and implementation of solder-activated joints for single-actuator, centimeter-scale robotic mechanisms , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[24]  Pierre E. Dupont,et al.  Design and Control of Concentric-Tube Robots , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[25]  J. Dankelman,et al.  Vacuum packed particles as flexible endoscope guides with controllable rigidity , 2010 .

[26]  J Dankelman,et al.  Scopes Too Flexible...and Too Stiff , 2010, IEEE Pulse.

[27]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  Jamming as an enabling technology for soft robotics , 2010, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[28]  Hao Chen,et al.  Design and analysis of a soft mobile robot composed of multiple thermally activated joints driven by a single actuator , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[29]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  Design and Kinematic Modeling of Constant Curvature Continuum Robots: A Review , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[31]  Peter K. Allen,et al.  Design, simulation and evaluation of kinematic alternatives for Insertable Robotic Effectors Platforms in Single Port Access Surgery , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[32]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Polymer Rigidity Control for Endoscopic Shaft-Guide ‘Plastolock’ — A Feasibility Study , 2010 .

[33]  Pierre E. Dupont,et al.  Stiffness Control of Surgical Continuum Manipulators , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[34]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Modeling of Light Intensity-Modulated Fiber-Optic Displacement Sensors , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[35]  J. Dai,et al.  FLEXIBLE ROBOTICS , 2011, BJU international.

[36]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  An articulated universal joint based flexible access robot for minimally invasive surgery , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[37]  Alexander Verl,et al.  The Bionic Handling Assistant: a success story of additive manufacturing , 2011 .

[38]  Hua Dong,et al.  Adjustable stiffness tubes via thermal modulation of a low melting point polymer , 2012 .

[39]  157. Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2012 .

[40]  W. Huang,et al.  Stimulus-responsive shape memory materials: A review , 2012 .

[41]  Karl Iagnemma,et al.  Design and Analysis of a Robust, Low-cost, Highly Articulated manipulator enabled by jamming of granular media , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[42]  P. Dario,et al.  A novel intracorporeal assembling robotic system for single-port laparoscopic surgery , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[43]  T. Nanayakkara,et al.  A VARIABLE STIFFNESS JOINT BY GRANULAR JAMMING , 2012 .

[44]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Soft Robot Arm Inspired by the Octopus , 2012, Adv. Robotics.

[45]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  An optical curvature sensor for flexible manipulators , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[46]  Jamie L. Branch,et al.  Robotic Tentacles with Three‐Dimensional Mobility Based on Flexible Elastomers , 2013, Advanced materials.

[47]  Karl Iagnemma,et al.  A Novel Layer Jamming Mechanism With Tunable Stiffness Capability for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[48]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  A comparative study for robot assisted vitreoretinal surgery: Micron vs. the Steady-Hand Robot , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[49]  Carmel Majidi,et al.  Soft-matter composites with electrically tunable elastic rigidity , 2013 .

[50]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Fundamentals on the Use of Shape Memory Alloys in Soft Robotics , 2013 .

[51]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Emerging Robotic Platforms for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2013, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[52]  Arianna Menciassi,et al.  STIFF-FLOP surgical manipulator: Mechanical design and experimental characterization of the single module , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[53]  Mehran Armand,et al.  A continuum manipulator made of interlocking fibers , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[54]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Continuous Backbone “Continuum” Robot Manipulators , 2013 .

[55]  Yi Sun,et al.  Characterization of silicone rubber based soft pneumatic actuators , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[56]  Karl Iagnemma,et al.  A Stiffness-Adjustable Hyperredundant Manipulator Using a Variable Neutral-Line Mechanism for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[57]  Paolo Dario,et al.  A Miniature Robot for Retraction Tasks under Vision Assistance in Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2014, Robotics.

[58]  Y. Choi,et al.  Laparoendoscopic single‐site (LESS) robot‐assisted nephroureterectomy: comparison with conventional multiport technique in the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma , 2014, BJU international.