Men, Women, and Leadership Centralization in Groups Over Time.

The authors propose a model for predicting the emergence of group norms from the demographic composition of groups. They use this model to study gender and leadership centralization in groups over time. Results from 2 longitudinal studies were consistent with their predictions: (a) Women, more than men, preferred equality norms in groups; (b) all-male and majority-male groups had relatively centralized leadership structures; (c) all-female groups had relatively decentralized leadership structures; and (d) balanced and majority-female groups were relatively centralized at the onset of group interaction but decreased in centralization over time. Much research and theory has addressed how being male or female influences an individual’s chance of emerging as a leader in a small group or team (cf. Carli & Eagly, 1999; Eagly & Karau, 1991). Little is known, however, about how the sex composition of a group influences its emergent leadership structure: that is, whether a group develops a more centralized structure, whereby leadership is concentrated in one or a few group members, or a more decentralized structure, whereby leadership is shared among members (e.g., Pearce & Sims, 2002). This is an important issue to understand, as centralized structures have been linked to lower levels of group cohesion (Widmeyer, Brawley, & Carron, 1990), satisfaction (Porter & Lawler, 1964), and performance (e.g., Bloom, 1999; Janis, 1989) and to higher levels of tardiness, absenteeism, and turnover (Durand, 1985; Spink & Carron, 1992). Moreover, conventional wisdom and some theories suggest that a group’s leadership structure is shaped by its sex composition. This article represents one of the first contributions to this endeavor. We propose a dominant norms model of how a group’s sex composition determines its leadership centralization, both early in its development and over time. This model is based on the idea that individuals with different social characteristics and backgrounds prefer different interaction norms in groups. It considers these preferences, along with differences in status between the social groups in question, to predict which norms will initially and eventually dominate group interaction. We test the model with two longitudinal studies of groups with different sex compositions.

[1]  J. Piliavin,et al.  The effects of the sex composition of groups on style of social interaction , 1978 .

[2]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Traits, expectations, culture, and clout: The dynamics of diversity in work groups. , 1995 .

[3]  F. Pratto,et al.  Social Dominance Orientation and the Political Psychology of Gender: A Case of Invariance? , 1994 .

[4]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  Gender and leadership in work groups: Six alternative models , 1996 .

[5]  A. Eagly,et al.  Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. , 2000 .

[6]  A. V. Knippenberg,et al.  Factors affecting social categorization processes in memory , 1994 .

[7]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF “TALL” VERSUS “FLAT” ORGANIZATION STRUCTURES ON MANAGERIAL JOB SATISFACTION , 1964 .

[8]  Earley,et al.  Playing Follow the Leader: Status-Determining Traits in Relation to Collective Efficacy across Cultures. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[9]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[10]  W. Goodenough,et al.  Human Group , 1951, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[11]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[12]  B. Lawrence The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[13]  L. Frederiksen,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT , 1981 .

[14]  A. Carrón,et al.  Group Cohesion and Adherence in Exercise Classes , 1992 .

[15]  M. Diehl,et al.  Why Groups are less Effective than their Members: On Productivity Losses in Idea-generating Groups , 1994 .

[16]  M. Bloom,et al.  The Performance Effects of Pay Dispersion on Individuals and Organizations , 1999 .

[17]  B. Malle,et al.  Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. , 1994 .

[18]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Personality, Organizational Culture, and Cooperation: Evidence from a Business Simulation. , 1995 .

[19]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[20]  I. Steiner Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[21]  R. Savin-Williams,et al.  Dominance Hierarchies in Groups of Early Adolescents. , 1979 .

[22]  J. Miller,et al.  Toward a new psychology of women , 1976 .

[23]  Andrew J. DuBrin,et al.  6 – Small Group Behavior , 1977 .

[24]  S. Fiske,et al.  Confusing one person with another: what errors reveal about the elementary forms of social relations. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  C Anderson,et al.  Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Thomas Eckes,et al.  The developmental social psychology of gender , 2000 .

[27]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender, Hierarchy, and Leadership: An Introduction , 2001 .

[28]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. , 1992 .

[29]  H. Kelley,et al.  Effects of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[30]  M. S. Mast Men Are Hierarchical, Women Are Egalitarian: An Implicit Gender Stereotype , 2004 .

[31]  Amado M. Padilla,et al.  Acculturation: Theory, Models, And Some New Findings , 1983 .

[32]  Marianne Schmid Mast,et al.  Female Dominance Hierarchies: Are They Any Different from Males’? , 2002 .

[33]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. , 2002 .

[34]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Gender and the emergence of leaders : a meta-analysis , 1991 .

[35]  L. James,et al.  rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. , 1993 .

[36]  James H. Liu,et al.  Social Dominance Orientation and the Legitimization of Inequality Across Cultures , 2000 .

[37]  D. Anda Bicultural Socialization: Factors Affecting the Minority Experience , 1984 .

[38]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender effects on social influence and emergent leadership. , 1999 .

[39]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  The Effects of Group Size in Sport , 1990 .

[40]  Marian N. Ruderman,et al.  Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. , 1995 .

[41]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[42]  Mary L. Fennell,et al.  Gender, interaction, and leadership , 1996 .

[43]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[44]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. , 1986 .

[45]  W. Richard Scott,et al.  Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach , 1962 .

[46]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  The Emergence of Norms in Competitive Decision-Making Groups. , 1985 .

[47]  E. Aries,et al.  Interaction Patterns and Themes of Male, Female, and Mixed Groups , 1976 .

[48]  Roya Ayman,et al.  Leadership theory and research : perspectives and directions , 1993 .

[49]  W. Richard Scott,et al.  Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach. , 1962 .

[50]  M. Schlossberg Toward a New Psychology of Women (2nd ed.). , 1988 .

[51]  D. Best,et al.  Sex and Psyche: Gender and Self Viewed Cross-Culturally , 1990 .

[52]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  Toward understanding sex differences in pay allocation: Agency, communion, and reward distribution behavior , 1982 .

[53]  Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo,et al.  Doméstica: Immigrant Workers Cleaning and Caring in the Shadows of Affluence , 2001 .