Impact of an electronic health record operating room management system in ophthalmology on documentation time, surgical volume, and staffing.

IMPORTANCE Although electronic health record (EHR) systems have potential benefits, such as improved safety and quality of care, most ophthalmology practices in the United States have not adopted these systems. Concerns persist regarding potential negative impacts on clinical workflow. In particular, the impact of EHR operating room (OR) management systems on clinical efficiency in the ophthalmic surgery setting is unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of an EHR OR management system on intraoperative nursing documentation time, surgical volume, and staffing requirements. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS For documentation time and circulating nurses per procedure, a prospective cohort design was used between January 10, 2012, and January 10, 2013. For surgical volume and overall staffing requirements, a case series design was used between January 29, 2011, and January 28, 2013. This study involved ophthalmic OR nurses (n = 13) and surgeons (n = 25) at an academic medical center. EXPOSURES Electronic health record OR management system implementation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES (1) Documentation time (percentage of operating time documenting [POTD], absolute documentation time in minutes), (2) surgical volume (procedures/time), and (3) staffing requirements (full-time equivalents, circulating nurses/procedure). Outcomes were measured during a baseline period when paper documentation was used and during the early (first 3 months) and late (4-12 months) periods after EHR implementation. RESULTS There was a worsening in total POTD in the early EHR period (83%) vs paper baseline (41%) (P < .001). This improved to baseline levels by the late EHR period (46%, P = .28), although POTD in the cataract group remained worse than at baseline (64%, P < .001). There was a worsening in absolute mean documentation time in the early EHR period (16.7 minutes) vs paper baseline (7.5 minutes) (P < .001). This improved in the late EHR period (9.2 minutes) but remained worse than in the paper baseline (P < .001). While cataract procedures required more circulating nurses in the early EHR (mean, 1.9 nurses/procedure) and late EHR (mean, 1.5 nurses/procedure) periods than in the paper baseline (mean, 1.0 nurses/procedure) (P < .001), overall staffing requirements and surgical volume were not significantly different between the periods. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Electronic health record OR management system implementation was associated with worsening of intraoperative nursing documentation time especially in shorter procedures. However, it is possible to implement an EHR OR management system without serious negative impacts on surgical volume and staffing requirements.

[1]  P. G. Zimmermann.  Nursing management secrets , 2002 .

[2]  R. Foglia,et al.  Improving perioperative performance: the use of operations management and the electronic health record. , 2013, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[3]  Sarah Read-Brown,et al.  Electronic health record systems in ophthalmology: impact on clinical documentation. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[4]  Stuart R. Lipsitz,et al.  The Frequency and Significance of Discrepancies in the Surgical Count , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[5]  Michael F. Chiang,et al.  Time-Motion Analysis of Clinical Nursing Documentation During Implementation of an Electronic Operating Room Management System for Ophthalmic Surgery , 2013, AMIA.

[6]  B. Middel.  The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review1) , 2008 .

[7]  James A. Menke,et al.  Computerized clinical documentation system in the pediatric intensive care unit , 2001, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[8]  The First Anniversary of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act: the regulatory outlook for implementation. , 2010, Perspectives in health information management.

[9]  Anne F. Kittler,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  Michael F Chiang,et al.  Accuracy and speed of electronic health record versus paper-based ophthalmic documentation strategies. , 2013, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  Kyung W Park,et al.  Can efficient supply management in the operating room save millions? , 2009, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[12]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Research Paper: Controlled Trial of Direct Physician Order Entry: Effects on Physicians' Time Utilization in Ambulatory Primary Care Internal Medicine Practices , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  E. Cohen.  Adoption and Perceptions of Electronic Health Record Systems by Ophthalmologists: An American Academy of Ophthalmology Survey , 2009 .

[15]  Goldstein Mm,et al.  The First Anniversary of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act: The Regulatory Outlook for Implementation , 2010 .

[16]  Hsien-Chang Lin,et al.  Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[17]  P. L. Hildebrand,et al.  Adoption and perceptions of electronic health record systems by ophthalmologists: an American Academy of Ophthalmology survey. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[18]  Michael V. Boland,et al.  The impact of an electronic health record transition on a glaucoma subspecialty practice. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[19]  Daniel C. Tu,et al.  Evaluation of electronic health record implementation in ophthalmology at an academic medical center (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). , 2013, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[20]  Rebecca L Wu,et al.  Characteristics and costs of surgical scheduling errors. , 2012, American journal of surgery.

[21]  C. McDonald,et al.  Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization. , 1993, JAMA.

[22]  Michael V. Boland.  Meaningful use of electronic health records in ophthalmology. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[23]  Dick Rs,et al.  The Computer-Based Patient Record: Revised Edition: An Essential Technology for Health Care , 1997 .

[24]  D. Simel,et al.  A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research. , 1994, Health services research.

[25]  Stephen H. Cohen,et al.  A pilot study to document the return on investment for implementing an ambulatory electronic health record at an academic medical center. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[26]  Maulik S Joshi,et al.  Progress toward meaningful use: hospitals' adoption of electronic health records. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[27]  I. Sim,et al.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. , 2004, Health affairs.

[28]  Vinita M Ollapally.  Meaningful use of electronic health records. , 2010, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[29]  Ida Sim,et al.  Electronic Medical Records in Solo/Small Groups: A Qualitative Study of Physician User Types , 2004, MedInfo.

[30]  M. Stabile,et al.  Review article: The evolving role of information technology in perioperative patient safety , 2013, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.

[31]  Mark B Horton,et al.  Special requirements for electronic health record systems in ophthalmology. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[32]  Matthew B Weinger,et al.  Changes in intensive care unit nurse task activity after installation of a third-generation intensive care unit information system , 2003, Critical care medicine.

[33]  Michael F Chiang,et al.  Adoption of electronic health records and preparations for demonstrating meaningful use: an American Academy of Ophthalmology survey. , 2013, Ophthalmology.