Sparse Bayesian Inference of White Matter Fiber Orientations from Compressed Multi-resolution Diffusion MRI

The RubiX [1] algorithm combines high SNR characteristics of low resolution data with high spacial specificity of high resolution data, to extract microstructural tissue parameters from diffusion MRI. In this paper we focus on estimating crossing fiber orientations and introduce sparsity to the RubiX algorithm, making it suitable for reconstruction from compressed (under-sampled) data. We propose a sparse Bayesian algorithm for estimation of fiber orientations and volume fractions from compressed diffusion MRI. The data at high resolution is modeled using a parametric spherical deconvolution approach and represented using a dictionary created with the exponential decay components along different possible directions. Volume fractions of fibers along these orientations define the dictionary weights. The data at low resolution is modeled using a spatial partial volume representation. The proposed dictionary representation and sparsity priors consider the dependence between fiber orientations and the spatial redundancy in data representation. Our method exploits the sparsity of fiber orientations, therefore facilitating inference from under-sampled data. Experimental results show improved accuracy and decreased uncertainty in fiber orientation estimates. For under-sampled data, the proposed method is also shown to produce more robust estimates of fiber orientations.

[1]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Semi-Supervised Linear Spectral Unmixing Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Model for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Pushing spatial and temporal resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[3]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Advances in diffusion MRI acquisition and processing in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[4]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Optimal Design of Multiple Q-shells experiments for Diffusion MRI , 2011 .

[6]  Daniel C. Alexander,et al.  Camino: Open-Source Diffusion-MRI Reconstruction and Processing , 2006 .

[7]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Multitask Compressive Sensing , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Hiroshi Sawada,et al.  Blind sparse source separation for unknown number of sources using Gaussian mixture model fitting with Dirichlet prior , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[9]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[10]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  Super-resolution reconstruction to increase the spatial resolution of diffusion weighted images from orthogonal anisotropic acquisitions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  Daniel K Sodickson,et al.  Low‐rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for accelerated dynamic MRI with separation of background and dynamic components , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  R. Deriche,et al.  Comparison of sampling strategies and sparsifying transforms to improve compressed sensing diffusion spectrum imaging , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Mark F. Lythgoe,et al.  Compartment models of the diffusion MR signal in brain white matter: A taxonomy and comparison , 2012, NeuroImage.

[14]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  RubiX: Combining Spatial Resolutions for Bayesian Inference of Crossing Fibers in Diffusion MRI , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  George Eastman House,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine , 2001 .