Microstructure and compression properties of 3D powder printed Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds with designed porosity: Experimental and computational analysis.

The osseointegration of metallic implants depends on an effective balance among designed porosity to facilitate angiogenesis, tissue in-growth and bone-mimicking elastic modulus with good strength properties. While addressing such twin requirements, the present study demonstrates a low temperature additive manufacturing based processing strategy to fabricate Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds with designed porosity using inkjet-based 3D powder printing (3DPP). A novel starch-based aqueous binder was prepared and the physico-chemical parameters such as pH, viscosity, and surface tension were optimized for drop-on-demand (DOD) based thermal inkjet printing. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) of sintered scaffolds revealed a 57% total porosity in homogeneously porous scaffold and 45% in the gradient porous scaffold with 99% interconnectivity among the micropores. Under uniaxial compression testing, the strength of homogeneously porous and gradient porous scaffolds were ~47MPa and ~90MPa, respectively. The progressive failure in homogeneously porous scaffold was recorded. In parallel to experimental measurements, finite element (FE) analyses have been performed to study the stress distribution globally and also locally around the designed pores. Consistent with FE analyses, a higher elastic modulus was recorded with gradient porous scaffolds (~3GPa) than the homogenously porous scaffolds (~2GPa). While comparing with the existing literature reports, the present work, for the first time, establishes 'direct powder printing methodology' of Ti-6Al-4V porous scaffolds with biomedically relevant microstructural and mechanical properties. Also, a new FE analysis approach, based on the critical understanding of the porous architecture using micro-CT results, is presented to realistically predict the compression response of porous scaffolds.

[1]  N. Michailidis,et al.  Experimental and FEM analysis of the material response of porous metals imposed to mechanical loading , 2011 .

[2]  B. Basu,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-titanium bulk composites for bone tissue engineering applications. , 2015, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[3]  Wook-Jin Lee,et al.  Effect of Pore Morphology on Deformation Behaviors in Porous Al by FEM Simulations , 2013 .

[4]  D R Sumner,et al.  Functional adaptation and ingrowth of bone vary as a function of hip implant stiffness. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Konrad Wissenbach,et al.  Ductility of a Ti‐6Al‐4V alloy produced by selective laser melting of prealloyed powders , 2010 .

[6]  Barbara D Boyan,et al.  Additively manufactured 3D porous Ti-6Al-4V constructs mimic trabecular bone structure and regulate osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and local factor production in a porosity and surface roughness dependent manner , 2014, Biofabrication.

[7]  Wenguang Zhang,et al.  Fabrication and compressive properties of Ti6Al4V implant with honeycomb‐like structure for biomedical applications , 2010 .

[8]  Karthikeyan Subramani,et al.  Titanium Surface Modification Techniques for Implant Fabrication – From Microscale to the Nanoscale , 2010 .

[9]  Kaufui Wong,et al.  A Review of Additive Manufacturing , 2012 .

[10]  Jan Wieding,et al.  The Effect of Structural Design on Mechanical Properties and Cellular Response of Additive Manufactured Titanium Scaffolds , 2012, Materials.

[11]  N. Michailidis,et al.  FEM modeling of the response of porous Al in compression , 2010 .

[12]  Uwe Gbureck,et al.  Low temperature fabrication of magnesium phosphate cement scaffolds by 3D powder printing , 2010, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[13]  R. Saigal,et al.  Chapter 24 – 3D Scaffolds , 2014 .

[14]  M Browne,et al.  Long-term biocompatibility and osseointegration of electron beam melted, free-form–fabricated solid and porous titanium alloy: Experimental studies in sheep , 2013, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[15]  R. Reis,et al.  Materials in particulate form for tissue engineering. 2. Applications in bone , 2007, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[16]  Ron Shahar,et al.  Whole bone mechanics and mechanical testing. , 2008, Veterinary journal.

[17]  Radovan Kovacevic,et al.  Evaluation of titanium alloy fabricated using electron beam melting system for dental applications , 2011 .

[18]  A. Varma,et al.  Novel Synthesis of Orthopaedic Implant Materials , 2002 .

[19]  B. Derby.  Inkjet Printing of Functional and Structural Materials: Fluid Property Requirements, Feature Stability, and Resolution , 2010 .

[20]  P. Calvert.  Inkjet Printing for Materials and Devices , 2001 .

[21]  B. Derby,et al.  Inkjet printing biomaterials for tissue engineering: bioprinting , 2014 .

[22]  Fanrong Pu,et al.  Effect of titanium carbide coating on the osseointegration response in vitro and in vivo. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[23]  Jun Kit Wang,et al.  Physical and mechanical characterisation of 3D-printed porous titanium for biomedical applications , 2014, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[24]  J. Currey.  The structure and mechanics of bone , 2011, Journal of Materials Science.

[25]  Florencia Edith Wiria,et al.  Printing of Titanium implant prototype , 2010 .

[26]  L. Murr,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V produced by rapid-layer manufacturing, for biomedical applications. , 2009, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[27]  Changqing Zhang,et al.  Three dimensionally printed mesoporous bioactive glass and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. , 2014, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[28]  Shivakumar Raman,et al.  Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM). , 2010, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[29]  J. Davies,et al.  Engineering three-dimensional bone tissue in vitro using biodegradable scaffolds: investigating initial cell-seeding density and culture period. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[30]  A. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing , 2013 .

[31]  Gray L. Winters,et al.  Stainless Steels for Medical and Surgical Applications , 2003 .

[32]  P. Layrolle,et al.  Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[33]  Jun Kit Wang,et al.  Toward 3D Printed Bioactive Titanium Scaffolds with Bimodal Pore Size Distribution for Bone Ingrowth , 2013 .

[34]  H. Shen,et al.  A numerical investigation of porous titanium as orthopedic implant material , 2011 .

[35]  J. Kruth,et al.  A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V , 2010 .

[36]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs , 2012 .

[37]  J. Chevalier,et al.  Effect of micro- and macroporosity of bone substitutes on their mechanical properties and cellular response , 2003, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[38]  U. Holzwarth,et al.  Effect of surface finish on the osseointegration of laser-treated titanium alloy implants. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[39]  Ryan B. Wicker,et al.  Microstructures and mechanical properties of electron beam-rapid manufactured Ti–6Al–4V biomedical prototypes compared to wrought Ti–6Al–4V , 2009 .

[40]  M. Gelinsky,et al.  Three-dimensional plotted hydroxyapatite scaffolds with predefined architecture: comparison of stabilization by alginate cross-linking versus sintering , 2016, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[41]  M. C. H. Meulen,et al.  Whole Bone Mechanics and Bone Quality , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[42]  Frank A. Müller,et al.  Resorbable Dicalcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes Prepared by 3D Powder Printing , 2007 .

[43]  Mohammad Masoud Mohebi,et al.  A drop-on-demand ink-jet printer for combinatorial libraries and functionally graded ceramics. , 2002, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[44]  M. Niinomi,et al.  Titanium-Based Biomaterials for Preventing Stress Shielding between Implant Devices and Bone , 2011, International journal of biomaterials.

[45]  Seeram Ramakrishna,et al.  Development of nanocomposites for bone grafting , 2005 .

[46]  J. Kruth,et al.  Effects of build orientation and heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V lattice structures , 2015 .

[47]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[48]  Bikramjit Basu,et al.  Low temperature additive manufacturing of three dimensional scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering applications: Processing related challenges and property assessment , 2016 .

[49]  F. E. Wiria,et al.  Effects of sintering temperature on morphology and mechanical characteristics of 3D printed porous titanium used as dental implant. , 2013, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[50]  B. Basu,et al.  On the toughness enhancement in hydroxyapatite-based composites , 2013 .

[51]  Ye Zhu,et al.  Phage Nanofibers Induce Vascularized Osteogenesis in 3D Printed Bone Scaffolds , 2014, Advanced materials.

[52]  Vamsi Krishna Balla,et al.  Microwave‐sintered 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering , 2013, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.