Cheminformatic models to predict binding affinities to human serum albumin.

Models to predict binding affinities to human serum albumin (HSA) should be very useful in the pharmaceutical industry to speed up the design of new compounds, especially as far as pharmacokinetics is concerned. We have experimentally determined through high-performance affinity chromatography the binding affinities to HSA of 95 diverse drugs and druglike compounds. These data have allowed us the derivation of quantitative structure-activity relationship models to predict binding affinities to HSA of new compounds on the basis of their structure. Simple linear, one-variable models have been derived for specific families of compounds (r(2) > or = 0.80; q(2) > or = 0.62): beta-adrenergic antagonists, steroids, COX inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants. Also, global models have been derived to be applicable to the whole medicinal chemical space by using the full database of HSA binding constants described above. For this aim, a genetic algorithm has been used to exhaustively search and select for multivariate and nonlinear equations, starting from a large pool of molecular descriptors. The resulting models display good fits to the experimental data (r(2) > or = 0.78; LOF < or = 0.12). In addition, both internal (cross validation and randomization) and external validation tests have demonstrated that these models have good predictive power (q(2) > or = 0.73; PRESS/SSY < or = 0.23; r(2) > or = 0.82 for the external set). Statistical analysis of the equation populations indicates that hydrophobicity (as measured by the ClogP) is the most important variable determining the binding extent to HSA. In addition, structural factors (especially the topological (6)chi(ring) index and some Jurs descriptors) also frequently appear as descriptors in the best equations. Therefore, binding to HSA turns out to be determined by a combination of hydrophobic forces together with some modulating shape factors. This agrees with X-ray structures of HSA alone or bound to ligands, where the binding pockets of both sites I and II are composed mainly of hydrophobic residues.

[1]  H. Wiener Structural determination of paraffin boiling points. , 1947, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  H. Hosoya Topological Index. A Newly Proposed Quantity Characterizing the Topological Nature of Structural Isomers of Saturated Hydrocarbons , 1971 .

[3]  D. Cvetkovic,et al.  Graph theory and molecular orbitals , 1974 .

[4]  Paul K. Weiner,et al.  Ground states of molecules , 1972 .

[5]  I. Gutman,et al.  Graph theory and molecular orbitals. XII. Acyclic polyenes , 1975 .

[6]  Henry S. Rzepa,et al.  Ground states of molecules: Part XLII. Vibrational frequencies of isotopically-substituted molecules calculated using MINDO/3 force constants , 1977 .

[7]  Walter Thiel,et al.  Ground States of Molecules. 38. The MNDO Method. Approximations and Parameters , 1977 .

[8]  J. Topliss,et al.  CHANCE FACTORS IN STUDIES OF QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS , 1980 .

[9]  A. Balaban Highly discriminating distance-based topological index , 1982 .

[10]  G. Amidon,et al.  Absorption potential: estimating the fraction absorbed for orally administered compounds. , 1985, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[11]  David J. Craik,et al.  FUNCTIONAL GROUP CONTRIBUTIONS TO DRUG-RECEPTOR INTERACTIONS , 1985 .

[12]  Eamonn F. Healy,et al.  Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. AM1: a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model , 1985 .

[13]  Peter C. Jurs,et al.  Descriptions of molecular shape applied in studies of structure/activity and structure/property relationships , 1987 .

[14]  A. Ghose,et al.  Atomic physicochemical parameters for three dimensional structure directed quantitative structure‐activity relationships III: Modeling hydrophobic interactions , 1988 .

[15]  D C Carter,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of human serum albumin. , 1989, Science.

[16]  P. Jurs,et al.  Development and use of charged partial surface area structural descriptors in computer-assisted quantitative structure-property relationship studies , 1990 .

[17]  D C Carter,et al.  Structure of human serum albumin. , 1990, Science.

[18]  S. Wold Validation of QSAR's , 1991 .

[19]  J. Freidman,et al.  Multivariate adaptive regression splines , 1991 .

[20]  Roman Kaliszan,et al.  Quantitative structure-enationselective retention relationships for the chromatography of 1,4-benzodiazepines on a human serum albumin based HPLC chiral stationary phase: An approach to the computational prediction of retention and enantioselectivity , 1992 .

[21]  D. C. Carter,et al.  Atomic structure and chemistry of human serum albumin , 1993, Nature.

[22]  S. Urien,et al.  Drug Binding in Plasma , 1994, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[23]  D C Carter,et al.  Structure of serum albumin. , 1994, Advances in protein chemistry.

[24]  J. Topliss,et al.  Unified model for the corneal permeability of related and diverse compounds with respect to their physicochemical properties. , 1996, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[25]  Wolfgang Banzhaf,et al.  Genetic Programming: An Introduction , 1997 .

[26]  O. Ivanciuc,et al.  ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS APPLICATIONS. PART 4. QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS FOR THE ESTIMATION OF THE RELATIVE TOXICITY OF PHENOLS FOR TETRAHYMENA , 1998 .

[27]  Vidroha Debroy,et al.  Genetic Programming , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[28]  T. Hanai,et al.  Influence of glycosylation on the drug binding of human serum albumin. , 1998, Biomedical chromatography : BMC.

[29]  Peter C. Jurs,et al.  Prediction of Human Intestinal Absorption of Drug Compounds from Molecular Structure , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[30]  T. Kinoshita,et al.  Quantitative analysis of human serum albumin-drug interactions using reversed-phase and ion-exchange liquid chromatography , 1999 .

[31]  G P Moss,et al.  Investigation of the mechanism of flux across human skin in vitro by quantitative structure-permeability relationships. , 1999, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[32]  S. Basak,et al.  Prediction of the dermal penetration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): a hierarchical QSAR approach. , 1999, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[33]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Toward minimalistic modeling of oral drug absorption. , 1999, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[34]  B Testa,et al.  Predicting blood-brain barrier permeation from three-dimensional molecular structure. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[35]  M. Cronin,et al.  Computational methods for the prediction of drug toxicity. , 2000, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[36]  John G. Topliss,et al.  QSAR Model for Drug Human Oral Bioavailability1 , 2000 .

[37]  S. Ekins,et al.  Three-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship computational approaches for prediction of human in vitro intrinsic clearance. , 2000, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[38]  A. Cavalli,et al.  Stereoselective binding of 2,3-substituted 3-hydroxypropionic acids on an immobilised human serum albumin chiral stationary phase: stereochemical characterisation and quantitative structure-retention relationship study. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[39]  J. Topliss,et al.  QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.