Online Exogamy Reconsidered: Estimating the Internet's Effects on Racial, Educational, Religious, Political and Age Assortative Mating

Abstract:As the Internet's role in creating new couples continues to expand, now accounting for over a third of recently-formed U.S. couples, its impact on endogamy is increasingly consequential. While there are good reasons to expect greater diversity from online romantic sources, there are also good sociological reasons to predict greater assortativity online. Increases in the rates of interracial and interreligious couples within the U.S. have occurred seemingly in tandem with the rise of online dating, but the evidence connecting online romances and couple heterogeneity have been limited and mixed. Using a unique nationally-representative dataset collected in 2009 and 2017 on how U.S. couples met, and controlling for the diversity of their local geographies, I find that couples who met online are more likely to be interracial, interreligious, and of different college degree status, but also more similar in age. Couples who met online are not more nor less likely to cross political boundaries, however, and not more nor less likely to have educationally different mothers. These exogamy differences can vary by where on the Internet couples met. Population-level estimates suggest that only a small part of the recent changes in couple diversity can be directly attributed to couples meeting online, but there is the potential for more Internet-induced change if it continues to expand as the modal source of romance.

[1]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Aspirational pursuit of mates in online dating markets , 2018, Science Advances.

[2]  A. Anderson Social Media Use in 2018 , 2018 .

[3]  Adam S. Kahn Modern romance , 2017, New Media Soc..

[4]  Josue Ortega,et al.  The Strength of Absent Ties: Social Integration via Online Dating , 2017, ArXiv.

[5]  Michael J. Rosenfeld Marriage, Choice, and Couplehood in the Age of the Internet , 2017 .

[6]  Stephen Owen,et al.  Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy , 2017 .

[7]  M. Tienda,et al.  Marriage-Market Constraints and Mate-Selection Behavior: Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in Intermarriage. , 2017, Journal of marriage and the family.

[8]  Gregory A. Huber,et al.  Political Homophily in Social Relationships: Evidence from Online Dating Behavior , 2017, The Journal of Politics.

[9]  Soohyung Lee Effect of Online Dating on Assortative Mating: Evidence from South Korea , 2016 .

[10]  Kevin Lewis Preferences in the Early Stages of Mate Choice , 2016 .

[11]  Elizabeth Bruch,et al.  Extracting multistage screening rules from online dating activity data , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Yu Xie,et al.  Assortative mating without assortative preference , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Elizabeth Aura McClintock Beauty and Status , 2014 .

[14]  Kevin Lewis The limits of racial prejudice , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Ken-Hou Lin,et al.  Mate Selection in Cyberspace: The Intersection of Race, Gender, and Education1 , 2013, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Michael J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Searching for a Mate , 2012 .

[17]  Tobias H. Stark,et al.  The Double Edge of Common Interest , 2012 .

[18]  Noah Mark,et al.  Roommate's race and the racial composition of white college students' ego networks. , 2012, Social science research.

[19]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  Online Dating , 2012, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[20]  Jan Skopek,et al.  Who Contacts Whom? Educational Homophily in Online Mate Selection , 2011 .

[21]  Cynthia Feliciano,et al.  Patterns of Racial-Ethnic Exclusion by Internet Daters , 2011 .

[22]  Kevin Lewis,et al.  Beyond and Below Racial Homophily: ERG Models of a Friendship Network Documented on Facebook1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating , 2010 .

[24]  J. Galen Buckwalter,et al.  The Role of the Internet in Reconfiguring Marriages: A Cross-national Study , 2009 .

[25]  J. Krosnick,et al.  National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality , 2009 .

[26]  P. England,et al.  The Gendered Double Standard of Aging in US Marriage Markets , 2009 .

[27]  Hans-Peter Blossfeld,et al.  Educational Assortative Marriage in Comparative Perspective , 2009 .

[28]  P. Allison Fixed Effects Regression Models , 2009 .

[29]  S. Goodreau,et al.  Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks* , 2009, Demography.

[30]  Marco Gonzalez,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Social Networks Tastes, Ties, and Time: a New Social Network Dataset Using Facebook.com , 2022 .

[31]  Günter J. Hitsch,et al.  Matching and Sorting in Online Dating , 2008 .

[32]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Neighborhood selection and the social reproduction of concentrated racial inequality , 2008, Demography.

[33]  Andreas Wimmer,et al.  The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: A Multilevel Process Theory1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  Kimberly M. Christopherson The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: "On the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Dog" , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Scott Fricker,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys , 2005 .

[36]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[37]  Dunja Mladenic,et al.  Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery , 2005, KDD 2005.

[38]  Michael J. Rosenfeld,et al.  The Independence of Young Adults and the Rise of Interracial and Same-Sex Unions , 2005 .

[39]  Michael J. Rosenfeld A Critique of Exchange Theory in Mate Selection1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  L Cosmides,et al.  Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  J. Moody Race, School Integration, and Friendship Segregation in America1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[43]  H. Flap,et al.  Assortative Meeting and Mating: Unintended Consequences of Organized Settings for Partner Choices , 2001 .

[44]  K. Crowder,et al.  A New Marriage Squeeze for Black Women: The Role of Racial Intermarriage by Black Men , 2000 .

[45]  M. Couper A REVIEW OF ISSUES AND APPROACHES , 2000 .

[46]  P. Allison,et al.  Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups , 1999 .

[47]  Noah Mark,et al.  Birds of a Feather Sing Together , 1998 .

[48]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1997 .

[49]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  Evolution on a Dancing Landscape: Organizations and Networks in Dynamic Blau Space , 1991 .

[50]  Kathleen M. Carley A Theory of Group Stability , 1991 .

[51]  R. Mare Five decades of educational assortative mating. , 1991 .

[52]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. , 1987 .

[53]  S. Feld Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates , 1982 .

[54]  Terry C. Blum,et al.  HETEROGENEITY AND INTERMARRIAGE , 1982 .

[55]  P. Blau A Macrosociological Theory of Social Structure , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[56]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[57]  Bruce H. Mayhew,et al.  System Size and Structural Differentiation in Formal Organizations: A Baseline Generator for Two Major Theoretical Propositions , 1972 .

[58]  K. Davis INTERMARRIAGE IN CASTE SOCIETIES1 , 1941 .

[59]  James H. S. Bossard,et al.  Residential Propinquity as a Factor in Marriage Selection , 1932, American Journal of Sociology.

[60]  Gina Potarca Does the internet affect assortative mating? Evidence from the U.S. and Germany. , 2017, Social science research.

[61]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Online Dating & Relationships , 2014 .

[62]  Christian Rudder,et al.  Dataclysm: Who We are (When We Think No One's Looking) , 2014 .

[63]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Research Synthesis AAPOR Report on Online Panels , 2010 .

[64]  Charles Tilly,et al.  Durable Inequality , 2004 .

[65]  M. Kalmijn,et al.  Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. , 1998, Annual review of sociology.

[66]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Birds of a feather , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.