Order release in the hybrid MTO–FTO production

In this paper, we analyse and compare the impact of the choice of the release method in a hybrid make-to-order (MTO)–finish-to-order (FTO) production system composed of two stages. The study is motivated by a practical problem from the aluminium profiles manufacturing industry, where for shortening throughput times it is allowed to start production of standard and regular items without confirmed orders, holding a stock of semi-finished products. The first stage manufactures both, items to order and items to a stock of semi-finished products, while the second stage is a customization stage based on customer demand requests and specifications. The paper addresses the questions of where order release control should be exercised, i.e., at only one stage or at both stages, and when should it be exercised. Simulation results suggest that load-based order release can be successfully applied to this hybrid production system when combined with a replenishment control policy for semi-finished products. Load-based order release contributes to reduce the total throughput time and the percentage of tardy orders of both, MTO and FTO, while contributing to a reduction of the semi-finished products inventory levels required to achieve a given fill rate. The study is a contribution toward the alignment of workload control theory to industrial practice.

[1]  Cristovao Silva,et al.  Workload control release mechanisms: from practice back to theory building , 2010 .

[2]  Y. Sugimori,et al.  Toyota production system and Kanban system Materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system , 1977 .

[3]  Brian G. Kingsman,et al.  Modelling input-output workload control for dynamic capacity planning in production planning systems , 2000 .

[4]  Muh-Cherng Wu,et al.  Scheduling a hybrid MTO/MTS semiconductor fab with machine-dedication features , 2008 .

[5]  Katsumi Morikawa,et al.  Make-to-stock policies for a multistage serial system under a make-to-order production environment , 2014 .

[6]  Cristovao Silva,et al.  Workload Control and Order Release: A Lean Solution for Make-to-Order Companies , 2012 .

[7]  Masoud Rabbani,et al.  A developed production control and scheduling model in the semiconductor manufacturing systems with hybrid make-to-stock/make-to-order products , 2009 .

[8]  Nuno O. Fernandes,et al.  Workload control under continuous order release , 2011 .

[9]  Chetan Soman,et al.  Capacitated planning and scheduling for combined make-to-order and make-to-stock production in the food industry: An illustrative case study , 2007 .

[10]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: a Study of Automotive Braking Systems , 1999 .

[11]  Mark C. Springer,et al.  Dynamic pooling of make-to-stock and make-to-order operations , 2013 .

[12]  Mark Stevenson,et al.  A review of production planning and control: the applicability of key concepts to the make-to-order industry , 2005 .

[13]  V. Donk Make to stock or make to order: the decoupling point in the food processing industries , 2001 .

[14]  S. Rajagopalan,et al.  Make to Order or Make to Stock: Model and Application , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[15]  D. P. Donk,et al.  Combined make-to-order and make-to-stock in a food production system , 2004 .

[16]  G. Gaalman,et al.  The influence of shop characteristics on workload control , 2000 .

[17]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  Managing Increasing Product Variety at Integrated Steel Mills , 2003 .

[18]  Milind Dawande,et al.  The Surplus Inventory Matching Problem in the Process Industry , 2000, Oper. Res..