The compilation of patch test information by the use of computerized data bases.

The use of computer technology to store, retrieve, and analyze patient data is not new. This article reviews the use of computerized data bases in patch test result record keeping. Efforts of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group serve as an example of how to create, manage, and apply these data.

[1]  E. Panconesi,et al.  Computer analysis of 3312 cases of contact dermatitis , 1986, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  A. Davies,et al.  Archie: the use of a microcomputer in an allergy clinic. , 1984, British journal of diseases of the chest.

[3]  Second Edition,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[4]  P Fabbri,et al.  [Premises and preliminary programming for the use of the computer in dermato-allergological diagnosis]. , 1971, Folia allergologica.

[5]  H. Maibach,et al.  The frequency of contact sensitivity in North America 1972–74 North American Contact Dermatitis Group , 1975, Contact dermatitis.

[6]  H A MacFarlane,et al.  Use of a computer program for contact clinic results , 1986, Contact dermatitis.

[7]  R. Houwing,et al.  Patch test results with standard allergens over a decade , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[8]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  A 10‐year review of an industrial dermatitis clinic , 1980, Contact dermatitis.

[9]  G Gailhofer [Computer-assisted recording and processing of patch test data. A model]. , 1988, Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and environment.

[10]  R. Brun Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Geneva (1000 cases) , 1975, Contact dermatitis.

[11]  M. Hiller,et al.  Computers, medical records, and the right to privacy. , 1981, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[12]  B. Edman Sites of contact dermatitis in relationship to particular allergens , 1985 .

[13]  C. Romaguera,et al.  Statistical and comparative study of 4600 patients tested in Barcelona (1973–1977) , 1980, Contact dermatitis.

[14]  L. Peltonen,et al.  Nickel sensitivity in the general population , 1979, Contact dermatitis.

[15]  M. Dooms,et al.  Computer assisted monitoring of contact dermatitis patients , 1980, Contact dermatitis.

[16]  H. Möller,et al.  Trends and forecasts for standard allergens in a 12‐year patch test material , 1982, Contact dermatitis.

[17]  J. Vestey,et al.  An analysis of 501 consecutive contact clinic consultations , 1986, Contact dermatitis.

[18]  M Bourgoin-Collas,et al.  Computer security: how safe are your records? , 1985, Dimensions in health service.

[19]  V E Pollak,et al.  Computerization of the medical record: use in care of patients with endstage renal disease. , 1983, Kidney international.

[20]  D. Sackett Bias in analytic research. , 1979, Journal of chronic diseases.

[21]  W. Akers,et al.  Allergic contact hypersensitivity to nickel, neomycin, ethylenediamine, and benzocaine. Relationships between age, sex, history of exposure, and reactivity to standard patch tests and use tests in a general population. , 1979, Archives of dermatology.

[22]  E V Hess,et al.  A uniform database for rheumatic diseases: prepared by the Computer Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. , 1976, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[23]  O. Hammershøy Standard patch test results in 3,225 consecutive Danish patients from 1973 to 1977 , 1980, Contact dermatitis.

[24]  P. Marcussen THE RISE IN INCIDENCE OF NICKEL SENSITIVITY. , 1959, The British journal of dermatology.

[25]  M. Beck,et al.  Workshop on Computers and Contact Dermatitis , 1983 .

[26]  L. E. Rosenthal,et al.  Prevalence and relevance of allergic reactions in patients patch tested in North America--1984 to 1985. , 1989, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[27]  Bahmer Fa The Homburg model for recording allergologic data using electronic data processing , 1988 .

[28]  J F Fries,et al.  A uniform database for rheumatic diseases. , 1979, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[29]  W. M. Suen,et al.  Use of microcomputer for histopathology: system using IBM PC and dBaseIII. , 1988, Journal of clinical pathology.