Examining alternative landscape metrics in ecological forest planning : a case for capercaillie in Catalonia

This study examined the performance of four different landscape metrics in a landscape ecological forest planning situation in Catalonia: (1) proportion of suitable habitat (non-spatial) (%H); (2) spatial autocorrelation; (3) the proportion of habitat-habitat boundary of the total compartment boundary (H-H) and (4) the proportion of habitat-non-habitat boundary (H-nonH). They were analysed in a case study problem that aimed at the maintenance and improvement of capercaillie habitats in two simulated forests of 14,400 hectares consisting mainly of Pinus uncinata, P. sylvestris and P. nigra stands. The habitats were determined by using a stand-level habitat suitability index (HSI). Stands in which the HSI exceed a specified threshold value were considered as habitats. Then, four different planning problems were formulated to test the four landscape metrics as one of the management objectives. The objective functions of the problems were written in the form of an additive utility model, and the problems were solved using heuristic optimization techniques. Before this, five different heuristic optimization techniques: random ascent; Hero, simulated annealing (SA), tabu search and genetic algorithms (GA), were compared in a non-spatial and a spatial planning problem. Based on these comparisons, GA was selected for solving the spatial planning problems while SA was used for non-spatial problems. The spatial pattern of habitat patches was comparable when using the %H, H-H or spatial autocorrelation as a management objective. However, the limitations of using the non-spatial %H objective were clear in the second forest landscape with lacking trends in forest features. H-H and spatial autocorrelation yielded a more clustered landscape with larger habitat patches. The largest proportions of habitat and habitat–habitat boundaries were created when using the H-H as the ecological management objective. The use of spatial autocorrelation as a management objective resulted in a smaller habitat area and shorter habitat-habitat boundary than when %H and H-H were used as objectives, but the proportion of large habitat patches was rather high. H-H was very suitable for connecting habitat patches. When H-nonH was used as the ecological management objective a very fragmented landscape was generated.

[1]  C. Lockwood,et al.  Harvest scheduling with spatial constraints: a simulated annealing approach , 1993 .

[2]  Michael L. Morrison,et al.  Wildlife-habitat relationships , 1992 .

[3]  Marc J. Mazerolle,et al.  Patch characteristics and landscape context as predictors of species presence and abundance: A review1 , 1999 .

[4]  P. Wegge,et al.  Distribution and size of capercaillie leks in relation to old forest fragmentation , 1987, Oecologia.

[5]  C. Reeves.  Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems , 1993 .

[6]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Integrating scenic and recreational amenities into numerical forest planning , 1995 .

[7]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[8]  José G. Borges,et al.  HEURISTICS IN MULTI-OBJECTIVE FOREST MANAGEMENT , 2002 .

[9]  John Sessions,et al.  Using Tabu search to schedule timber harvests subject to spatial wildlife goals for big game , 1997 .

[10]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making , 1993 .

[12]  P. Angelstam,et al.  Threshold levels of habitat composition for the presence of the long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus) in a boreal landscape , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[13]  E. Ménoni,et al.  Ecologie et dynamique des populations du Grand Tetras dans les Pyrénées, avec des références spéciales à la biologie de la reproduction chez les poules. Quelques applications à sa conservation : [thèse soutenue sur un ensemble de travaux] , 1991 .

[14]  Ilse Storch,et al.  On Spatial Resolution in Habitat Models: Can Small-scale Forest Structure Explain Capercaillie Numbers? , 2002 .

[15]  D. D. Reed,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation of individual tree characteristics in loblolly pine stands , 1985 .

[16]  Ola Sallnäs,et al.  Harvest scheduling under adjacency constraints — a case study from the Swedish sub‐alpine region , 1993 .

[17]  I. Storch.  The Importance of Scale in Habitat Conservation for an Endangered Species: The Capercaillie in Central Europe , 1997 .

[18]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Introduction to Multi-Objective Forest Planning , 2002 .

[19]  Kevin Boston,et al.  An analysis of Monte Carlo integer programming, simulated annealing, and tabu search heuristics for solving spatial harvest scheduling problems. , 1999 .

[20]  M. Delibes,et al.  Current range and status of the Iberian lynx Felis pardina Temminck, 1824 in Spain , 1992 .

[21]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Optimising the management of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands in Spain based on individual-tree models , 2003 .

[22]  Karin Öhman,et al.  Forest Planning with Consideration to Spatial Relationships , 2001 .

[23]  M. Kurttila.  The spatial structure of forests in the optimization calculations of forest planning — a landscape ecological perspective , 2001 .

[24]  G. Auble.  Wildlife 2000—modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates , 1988 .

[25]  K. Johnson,et al.  Linear programming vs. binary search in periodic harvest level calculation , 1983 .

[26]  K. Öhman,et al.  The core area concept in forming contiguous areas for long-term forest planning , 1998 .

[27]  John Sessions,et al.  Eight heuristic planning techniques applied to three increasingly difficult wildlife planning problems , 2002 .

[28]  Mikko Mönkkönen,et al.  Landscape characteristics associated with the occurrence of the flying squirrel Pteromys volans in old-growth forests of northern Finland , 1997 .

[29]  R. L. Knight.  Ecosystem management and conservation biology , 1998 .

[30]  T. Pukkala,et al.  Measuring Non-Wood Forest Outputs in Numerical Forest Planning , 2002 .

[31]  Raymond J. Dezzani,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation of wildfire distribution in the Idyllwild Quadrangle, San Jacinto Mountain, California. , 1990 .

[32]  Pekka Helle,et al.  Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) Lekking sites in fragmented Finnish forest landscape , 1994 .

[33]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Forest Bird Habitat Suitability Models and the Development of General Habitat Models , 1991 .

[34]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  Examining the performance of six heuristic optimisation techniques in different forest planning problems , 2005 .

[35]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  The performance of alternative spatial objective types in forest planning calculations: a case for flying squirrel and moose , 2002 .

[36]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Landscape pattern and population conservation , 1995 .

[37]  M. Schamberger,et al.  Concepts and constraints of habitat model testing , 1986 .

[38]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Integrating forest-level and compartment-level indices of species diversity with numerical forest planning. , 1997 .

[39]  Growth and yield model for uneven-aged mixtures of Pinus sylvestris L. and Pinus nigra Arn. in Catalonia, north-east Spain , 2004 .

[40]  Karin Öhman,et al.  Creating continuous areas of old forest in long- term forest planning , 2000 .

[41]  Miguel Delibes,et al.  Iberian Lynx in a Fragmented Landscape: Predispersal, Dispersal, and Postdispersal Habitats , 2000 .

[42]  I. Storch.  Annual home ranges and spacing patterns of capercaillie in Central Europe , 1995 .