Visualizing dynamic cytoplasmic forces with a compliance-matched FRET sensor

Mechanical forces are ubiquitous modulators of cell activity but little is known about the mechanical stresses in the cell. Genetically encoded FRET-based force sensors now allow the measurement of local stress in specific host proteins in vivo in real time. For a minimally invasive probe, we designed one with a mechanical compliance matching that of many common cytoskeleton proteins. sstFRET is a cassette composed of Venus and Cerulean linked by a spectrin repeat. The stress sensitivity of the probe was measured in solution using DNA springs to push the donor and acceptor apart with 5–7 pN and this produced large changes in FRET. To measure cytoskeletal stress in vivo we inserted sstFRET into α-actinin and expressed it in HEK and BAEC cells. Time-lapse imaging showed the presence of stress gradients in time and space, often uncorrelated with obvious changes in cell shape. The gradients could be rapidly relaxed by thrombin-induced cell contraction associated with inhibition of myosin II. The tension in actinin fluctuated rapidly (scale of seconds) illustrating a cytoskeleton in dynamic equilibrium. Stress in the cytoskeleton can be driven by macroscopic stresses applied to the cell. Using sstFRET as a tool to measure internal stress, we tested the prediction that osmotic pressure increases cytoskeletal stress. As predicted, hypotonic swelling increased the tension in actinin, confirming the model derived from AFM. Anisotonic stress also produced a novel transient (~2 minutes) decrease in stress upon exposure to a hypotonic challenge, matched by a transient increase with hypertonic stress. This suggests that, at rest, the stress axis of actinin is not parallel to the stress axis of actin and that swelling can reorient actinin to lie more parallel where it can absorb a larger fraction of the total stress. Protein stress sensors are opening new perspectives in cell biology.

[1]  Michael L Klein,et al.  Unfolding a linker between helical repeats. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Nancy R Forde,et al.  Mechanical processes in biochemistry. , 2004, Annual review of biochemistry.

[3]  Frederick Sachs,et al.  A fluorescence energy transfer‐based mechanical stress sensor for specific proteins in situ , 2008, The FEBS journal.

[4]  Giovanni Zocchi,et al.  Controlling proteins through molecular springs. , 2009, Annual review of biophysics.

[5]  Gregory Q. Wallace,et al.  Mechanisms of muscle degeneration, regeneration, and repair in the muscular dystrophies. , 2009, Annual review of physiology.

[6]  S. Iwai,et al.  Visualizing myosin–actin interaction with a genetically-encoded fluorescent strain sensor , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Frederick Sachs,et al.  Real Time FRET Based Detection of Mechanical Stress in Cytoskeletal and Extracellular Matrix Proteins , 2011, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[8]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: The force journey of a tumor cell , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[9]  Markus Essler,et al.  Thrombin Inactivates Myosin Light Chain Phosphatase via Rho and Its Target Rho Kinase in Human Endothelial Cells* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  J. Garcia,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of thrombin-induced human and bovine endothelial cell activation. , 1992, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[11]  Hao Qu,et al.  The elastic energy of sharply bent nicked DNA , 2010 .

[12]  C. Kung,et al.  A possible unifying principle for mechanosensation , 2005, Nature.

[13]  N. Mohandas,et al.  Thermal stabilities of brain spectrin and the constituent repeats of subunits. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[14]  A. Cumano,et al.  Forced Unfolding of Proteins Within Cells , 2007 .

[15]  Hendrik Dietz,et al.  Exploring the energy landscape of GFP by single-molecule mechanical experiments. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Frederick Sachs,et al.  Atomic force microscopy analysis of cell volume regulation. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Kou-Gi Shyu,et al.  Cellular and molecular effects of mechanical stretch on vascular cells and cardiac myocytes. , 2009, Clinical science.

[18]  R. Ezzell,et al.  Targeted disruption of vinculin genes in F9 and embryonic stem cells changes cell morphology, adhesion, and locomotion. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  A. Verin,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms of Thrombin-Induced Endothelial Cell Permeability , 2004, Biochemistry (Moscow).

[20]  Javad Golji,et al.  Molecular Mechanics of the α-Actinin Rod Domain: Bending, Torsional, and Extensional Behavior , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  K. Djinović-Carugo,et al.  α-Actinin structure and regulation , 2008, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[22]  R. Austin,et al.  Force mapping in epithelial cell migration. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  Ning Wang,et al.  Rapid signal transduction in living cells is a unique feature of mechanotransduction , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Kyungpyo Park,et al.  Role of Purinergic Receptor in Alpha Fodrin Degradation in Par C5 Cells , 2009, Journal of dental research.

[26]  D. Speicher,et al.  Pathway shifts and thermal softening in temperature-coupled forced unfolding of spectrin domains. , 2003, Biophysical journal.