Learning the Cell Structures with Three-Dimensional Models: Students’ Achievement by Methods, Type of School and Questions’ Cognitive Level

The cell topic was taught to 9th-grade students in three modes of instruction: (a) students “hands-on,” who constructed three-dimensional cell organelles and macromolecules during the learning process; (b) teacher demonstration of the three-dimensional model of the cell structures; and (c) teaching the cell topic with the regular learning material in an expository mode (which use one- or two-dimensional cell structures as are presented in charts, textbooks and microscopic slides). The sample included 669, 9th-grade students from 25 classes who were taught by 22 Biology teachers. Students were randomly assigned to the three modes of instruction, and two tests in content knowledge in Biology were used. Data were treated with multiple analyses of variance. The results indicate that entry behavior in Biology was equal for all the study groups and types of schools. The “hands-on” learning group who build three-dimensional models through the learning process achieved significantly higher on academic achievements and on the high and low cognitive questions’ levels than the other two groups. The study indicates the advantages students may have being actively engaged in the learning process through the “hands-on” mode of instruction/learning.

[1]  George E. Glasson,et al.  The effects of hands-on and teacher demonstration laboratory methods on science achievement in relation to reasoning ability and prior knowledge , 1989 .

[2]  R. Lazarowitz,et al.  Israel:Formal Reasoning Skills of Secondary School Students and their Subject Matter Preferences , 1988 .

[3]  S. Barab,et al.  Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building , 2000 .

[4]  M. Foote.  Recognizing Spatial Relationships in Biology. , 1981 .

[5]  Randy Moore,et al.  Biological Sciences Curriculum Study , 2013 .

[6]  A. Dreyfus,et al.  The cell concept of 10th graders: curricular expectations and reality , 1988 .

[7]  D. Ausubel.  The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. , 1963 .

[8]  P. Mathis.  The Use of Manipulative Models in Teaching Mitosis and Meiosis , 1979 .

[9]  Eugene L. Chiappetta.  A review of piagetian studies relevant to science instruction at the secondary and college level , 1976 .

[10]  Paul B. Hounshell,et al.  Using three-dimensional models to teach molecular structures in high school chemistry , 1995 .

[11]  Inquiry Into Life , 1969 .

[12]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning , 1964 .

[13]  A. Lawson,et al.  Promoting Intellectual Development Through Science Teaching. , 1973 .

[14]  B. Reiser,et al.  Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners , 2009 .

[15]  Joseph J. Schwab.  Biology teachers' handbook , 1963 .

[16]  A. Howe,et al.  The use of concrete methods in secondary chemistry instruction , 1978 .

[17]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  High-School Chemistry Students' Performance and Gender Differences in a Computerized Molecular Modeling Learning Environment , 1999 .

[18]  Jon Harbor,et al.  Students' mental models of the environment† , 2007 .

[19]  M. Reiss,et al.  What Sense Do Children Make of Three-Dimensional, Life-Sized “Representations” of Animals? , 2000 .

[20]  Earl R. Glenn,et al.  National association for research in science teaching: National association for research in science teaching , 1929 .

[21]  R. Stavy,et al.  Effect of Bead and Illustrations Models on High School Students' Achievement in Molecular Genetics. , 2006 .

[22]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Science teachers' knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science , 2002 .

[23]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  The Effect of Student Manipulation of Molecular Models on Chemistry achievement According to Piagetian Level. , 1980 .

[24]  A. Lawson,et al.  A Study of Levels of Concrete and Formal Reasoning Ability in Disadvantaged Junior and Senior High School Science Students. , 1974 .