Temporal weighting of interaural time and level differences in high-rate click trains.

Temporal weighting functions (TWFs), quantifying sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITD) and interaural level differences (ILD) over the duration of brief stimuli, were measured in 6 normal hearing subjects using trains of 16 Gabor clicks centered at 4 kHz presented dichotically at 4 rates [inter-click intervals (ICI) of 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.25 ms]. Random ITD or ILD were imposed independently on each click in the train in separate conditions. The subject's task was to discriminate the lateral position of the click train ("left" or "right"). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was then used to quantify the effectiveness or "weight" of each click according to individual click ITD or ILD. Although individual differences were evident, onset cues appeared to dominate at high rates. Onset dominance was apparent for both ITD and ILD at 1.25 ms ICI and for ITD at 2.5 ms ICI, but for neither cue at 5 or 10 ms ICI. Onset dominance was greater on average for ITD than ILD, although TWFs were qualitatively similar for the two cues. No evidence was found for "upweighting" of late-arriving ILD [Stecker, G. C., and Hafter, E. R. (2009), J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3914-3924].

[1]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Lateralization of bands of noise as a function of combinations of interaural intensive differences, interaural temporal differences, and bandwidth. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  E R Hafter,et al.  The combination of interaural time and intensity in the lateralization of high-frequency complex signals. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Temporal integration and multiple looks. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Bruce G. Berg,et al.  Analysis of weights in multiple observation tasks , 1989 .

[5]  Kourosh Saberi,et al.  Precedence-effect thresholds for a population of untrained listeners as a function of stimulus intensity and interclick interval. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Kourosh Saberi,et al.  A population study of the precedence effect , 2004, Hearing Research.

[7]  R. H. Arnott,et al.  The ability of inferior colliculus neurons to signal differences in interaural delay , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[9]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Interaural Differences in Time and Level 1 , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  Heinrich Hertz,et al.  On the differences between localization and lateralization. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  V. Richards,et al.  Relative estimates of combination weights, decision criteria, and internal noise based on correlation coefficients. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Two-image lateralization of tones and clicks. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Robert A. Lutfi,et al.  Correlation coefficients and correlation ratios as estimates of observer weights in multiple‐observation tasks , 1995 .

[14]  Robert F Labadie,et al.  Interaural Time and Level Difference Thresholds for Acoustically Presented Signals in Post-Lingually Deafened Adults Fitted with Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using CIS+ Processing , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[15]  G Christopher Stecker,et al.  A recency effect in sound localization? , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  G. C. Stecker,et al.  Temporal weighting in sound localization. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  H. J. Arnold Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[18]  W. Hartmann,et al.  Localization of sound in rooms, II: The effects of a single reflecting surface. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  R L Freyman,et al.  Onset dominance in lateralization. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Observer weighting of level and timing cues in bilateral cochlear implant users , 2008 .

[21]  H S Colburn,et al.  The precedence effect. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  R. V. Hoesel Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. , 2004 .

[23]  D J Tollin,et al.  Some aspects of the lateralization of echoed sound in man. I. The classical interaural-delay based precedence effect. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Andrew D Brown,et al.  Temporal weighting of binaural cues revealed by detection of dynamic interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  E R Hafter,et al.  Detection of interaural differences of intensity in trains of high-frequency clicks as a function of interclick interval and number. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  William M Hartmann,et al.  Interaural level differences and the level-meter model. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Detection of interaural delay in high-frequency sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones, two-tone complexes, and bands of noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  L R Bernstein,et al.  The variation across time of sensitivity to interaural disparities: behavioral measurements and quantitative analyses. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  D W Grantham,et al.  Echo suppression and discrimination suppression aspects of the precedence effect , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  K Saberi,et al.  Observer weighting of interaural delays in filtered impulses , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli". , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Hans Wallach,et al.  The precedence effect in sound localization. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[33]  P M Zurek,et al.  The precedence effect and its possible role in the avoidance of interaural ambiguities. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.