Accuracy and sensitivity of finite element model-based deformable registration of the prostate.

PURPOSE Evaluate the accuracy and the sensitivity to contour variation and model size of a finite element model-based deformable registration algorithm for the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were obtained for 21 prostate patients with three implanted markers. A single observer contoured the prostate and markers and performed blinded recontouring of the first MRI. A biomechanical-model based deformable registration algorithm, MORFEUS, was applied to each dataset pair, deforming the second image (B) to the first image (A). The residual error was calculated by comparing the center of mass (COM) of the markers with the predicted COM. Sensitivity to contour variation was calculated by deforming B to the repeat contour of A (A2). The sensitivity to the model size was calculated by reducing the number of nodes (B', A', A2') and repeating the analysis. RESULTS The average residual error of the registration for B to A and B to A2 was 0.22 cm (SD: 0.08 cm) and 0.24 cm (SD: 0.09 cm), respectively. The average residual error of the registration of B' to A' and B' to A2' was 0.22 cm (SD: 0.10 cm) and 0.25 cm (SD: 0.10 cm), respectively. The average time to run MORFEUS on the standard and reduced model was 3606 s (SD: 7788 s) and 56 s (SD: 16 s), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The accuracy of the algorithm, equal to the image voxel size, is not affected by intraobserver contour variability or model size. Reducing the model size significantly increases algorithm efficiency.

[1]  Sarang Joshi,et al.  Large deformation three-dimensional image registration in image-guided radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Vladimir Pekar,et al.  Assessment of a model-based deformable image registration approach for radiation therapy planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  B Pickett,et al.  Forward or inversely planned segmental multileaf collimator IMRT and sequential tomotherapy to treat multiple dominant intraprostatic lesions of prostate cancer to 90 Gy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Vladimir Pekar,et al.  Automated model-based organ delineation for radiotherapy planning in prostatic region. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  A dynamic finite element surface model for segmentation and tracking in multidimensional medical images with application to cardiac 4D image analysis. , 1995, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[6]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  The changing face of prostate cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Maximilien Vermandel,et al.  Segmentation of abdominal ultrasound images of the prostate using a priori information and an adapted noise filter. , 2005, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[9]  Weiguo Lu,et al.  Deformable registration of the planning image (kVCT) and the daily images (MVCT) for adaptive radiation therapy , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  J. Speight,et al.  Radiotherapy in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: evolving standards, consensus, controversies and new directions. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  P Kijewski,et al.  Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion: implications for treatment planning. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Leen Paelinck,et al.  The magnetic resonance detected intraprostatic lesion in prostate cancer: planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Brain Segmentation and the Generation of Cortical Surfaces , 1999, NeuroImage.

[14]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Multiscale deformable model segmentation and statistical shape analysis using medial descriptions , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Automatic prostate localization on cone-beam CT scans for high precision image-guided radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  T. Mackie,et al.  Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  C Clifton Ling,et al.  A study of the effects of internal organ motion on dose escalation in conformal prostate treatments. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  K. Brock,et al.  Feasibility of a novel deformable image registration technique to facilitate classification, targeting, and monitoring of tumor and normal tissue. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional finite element-based deformable registration of pre- and intraoperative prostate imaging. , 2001, Medical physics.

[21]  K. Brock,et al.  A magnetic resonance imaging study of prostate deformation relative to implanted gold fiducial markers. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  L Verhey,et al.  Static field intensity modulation to treat a dominant intra-prostatic lesion to 90 Gy compared to seven field 3-dimensional radiotherapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Tom W J Scheenen,et al.  IMRT boost dose planning on dominant intraprostatic lesions: gold marker-based three-dimensional fusion of CT with dynamic contrast-enhanced and 1H-spectroscopic MRI. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  F F Yin,et al.  A three-dimensional deformable model for segmentation of human prostate from ultrasound images. , 2001, Medical physics.

[25]  John Wong,et al.  Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  D Yan,et al.  An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  G S Bauman,et al.  Dosimetric impact of image-guided 3D conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  K. Brock,et al.  Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration. , 2005, Medical physics.

[29]  Lei Xing,et al.  Narrow band deformable registration of prostate magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and computed tomography studies. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Implementation and validation of a three-dimensional deformable registration algorithm for targeted prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  Boyd McCurdy,et al.  A feasibility study to investigate the use of thin-plate splines to account for prostate deformation. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  Automated segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[33]  George T. Y. Chen,et al.  Four-dimensional image-based treatment planning: Target volume segmentation and dose calculation in the presence of respiratory motion. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[34]  J M Balter,et al.  A comparison of ventilatory prostate movement in four treatment positions. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[35]  David Jaffray,et al.  Assessment of residual error in liver position using kV cone-beam computed tomography for liver cancer high-precision radiation therapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[36]  Lei Dong,et al.  Intrafraction prostate motion during IMRT for prostate cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  Jon-Paul Voroney,et al.  Prospective comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for liver cancer delineation using deformable image registration. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[38]  George Starkschall,et al.  Semiautomated four-dimensional computed tomography segmentation using deformable models. , 2005, Medical physics.

[39]  Alan Horwich,et al.  Technological advances in radiotherapy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[40]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[41]  T. Byrne,et al.  A review of prostate motion with considerations for the treatment of prostate cancer. , 2005, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[42]  K Lam,et al.  Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.