Statistical shape modelling to aid surgical planning: associations between surgical parameters and head shapes following spring-assisted cranioplasty

PurposeSpring-assisted cranioplasty is performed to correct the long and narrow head shape of children with sagittal synostosis. Such corrective surgery involves osteotomies and the placement of spring-like distractors, which gradually expand to widen the skull until removal about 4 months later. Due to its dynamic nature, associations between surgical parameters and post-operative 3D head shape features are difficult to comprehend. The current study aimed at applying population-based statistical shape modelling to gain insight into how the choice of surgical parameters such as craniotomy size and spring positioning affects post-surgical head shape.MethodsTwenty consecutive patients with sagittal synostosis who underwent spring-assisted cranioplasty at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children (London, UK) were prospectively recruited. Using a nonparametric statistical modelling technique based on mathematical currents, a 3D head shape template was computed from surface head scans of sagittal patients after spring removal. Partial least squares (PLS) regression was employed to quantify and visualise trends of localised head shape changes associated with the surgical parameters recorded during spring insertion: anterior–posterior and lateral craniotomy dimensions, anterior spring position and distance between anterior and posterior springs.ResultsBivariate correlations between surgical parameters and corresponding PLS shape vectors demonstrated that anterior–posterior (Pearson’s $$r=0.64, p=0.002$$r=0.64,p=0.002) and lateral craniotomy dimensions (Spearman’s $$\rho =0.67, p<0.001$$ρ=0.67,p<0.001), as well as the position of the anterior spring ($$r=0.70, p<0.001$$r=0.70,p<0.001) and the distance between both springs ($$r=0.67, p=0.002$$r=0.67,p=0.002) on average had significant effects on head shapes at the time of spring removal. Such effects were visualised on 3D models.ConclusionsPopulation-based analysis of 3D post-operative medical images via computational statistical modelling tools allowed for detection of novel associations between surgical parameters and head shape features achieved following spring-assisted cranioplasty. The techniques described here could be extended to other cranio-maxillofacial procedures in order to assess post-operative outcomes and ultimately facilitate surgical decision making.

[1]  Peter Hammond,et al.  Combined soft and skeletal tissue modelling of normal and dysmorphic midface postnatal development. , 2016, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[2]  D. David,et al.  The Management of Nonsyndromic, Isolated Sagittal Synostosis , 2016, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[3]  Ting Wu,et al.  Anatomically Constrained Deformation for Design of Cranial Implant: Methodology and Validation , 2006, MICCAI.

[4]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Statistical models of sets of curves and surfaces based on currents , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  Christopher R Forrest,et al.  Surgical outcomes in craniosynostosis reconstruction: the use of prefabricated templates in cranial vault remodelling. , 2014, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[6]  Indriyati Atmosukarto,et al.  Skull Retrieval for Craniosynostosis Using Sparse Logistic Regression Models , 2012, MCBR-CDS.

[7]  J. Richtsmeier,et al.  Unilateral and bilateral expression of a quantitative trait: asymmetry and symmetry in coronal craniosynostosis. , 2012, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[8]  Srinivasan Mukundan,et al.  Increasing Concern Regarding Computed Tomography Irradiation in Craniofacial Surgery , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  Marco Caversaccio,et al.  Design and clinical evaluation of an image-guided surgical microscope with an integrated tracking system , 2006, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[10]  P. Chumas,et al.  Clinical management of craniosynostosis , 2006, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[11]  Emeric Gioan,et al.  A Combinatorial Method for 3D Landmark-Based Morphometry: Application to the Study of Coronal Craniosynostosis , 2012, MICCAI.

[12]  Tadaaki Kirita,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Interactive Surgical Planning Using Shape Descriptors in Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibular Segments , 2016, PloS one.

[13]  Carlos S. Mendoza,et al.  Computer-Based Quantitative Assessment of Skull Morphology for Craniosynostosis , 2012, CLIP.

[14]  A. Ivarsson,et al.  The Evolving Role of Springs in Craniofacial Surgery: The First 100 Clinical Cases , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  Marek Gzik,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Cranial Measurements - Determination of Indices for Assessing Skull Shape in Patients with Isolated Craniosynostosis , 2017 .

[16]  Dariush Nikkhah,et al.  Assessing the corrective effects of facial bipartition distraction in Apert syndrome using geometric morphometrics. , 2014, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[17]  Maxime Sermesant,et al.  A Non-parametric Statistical Shape Model for Assessment of the Surgically Repaired Aortic Arch in Coarctation of the Aorta: How Normal is Abnormal? , 2015, STACOM@MICCAI.

[18]  Pravin K. Patel,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis of Metopic Craniosynostosis: A Preliminary Study , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  Stefan Raith,et al.  Planning of mandibular reconstructions based on statistical shape models , 2016, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[20]  H. Lameckera,et al.  Surgical Treatment of Craniosynostosis based on a Statistical 3 D-Shape Model : First Clinical Application , 2006 .

[21]  Silvia Schievano,et al.  Three-Dimensional Handheld Scanning to Quantify Head-Shape Changes in Spring-Assisted Surgery for Sagittal Craniosynostosis , 2016, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[22]  Christoph Kunz,et al.  Computer-assisted virtual planning and surgical template fabrication for frontoorbital advancement. , 2015, Neurosurgical focus.

[23]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The Aesthetic Outcome of Surgical Correction for Sagittal Synostosis Can Be Reliably Scored by a Novel Method of Preoperative and Postoperative Visual Assessment , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[24]  S. Weisberg,et al.  Residuals and Influence in Regression , 1982 .

[25]  N. Wetjen,et al.  Virtual Surgical Planning in Craniofacial Surgery , 2014, Seminars in Plastic Surgery.

[26]  F. Staal,et al.  Describing Crouzon and Pfeiffer syndrome based on principal component analysis. , 2015, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[27]  I. Mathijssen,et al.  Spring-assisted correction of sagittal suture synostosis , 2012, Child's Nervous System.

[28]  Tadaaki Kirita,et al.  Volumetric Fibular Transfer Planning With Shape-Based Indicators in Mandibular Reconstruction , 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[29]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  A Statistical Model for Quantification and Prediction of Cardiac Remodelling: Application to Tetralogy of Fallot , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Wolfgang Freysinger,et al.  Custom implant design for large cranial defects , 2016, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[31]  Silvia Schievano,et al.  Quantifying the effect of corrective surgery for trigonocephaly: A non-invasive, non-ionizing method using three-dimensional handheld scanning and statistical shape modelling. , 2017, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[32]  Carlos S. Mendoza,et al.  What’s in a Name? Accurately Diagnosing Metopic Craniosynostosis Using a Computational Approach , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[33]  Stefan Zachow,et al.  Frame-based cranial reconstruction. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics.

[34]  Maxime Sermesant,et al.  A statistical shape modelling framework to extract 3D shape biomarkers from medical imaging data: assessing arch morphology of repaired coarctation of the aorta , 2016, BMC Medical Imaging.

[35]  Thomas Looi,et al.  Application of CAD/CAM Prefabricated Age-Matched Templates in Cranio-Orbital Remodeling in Craniosynostosis , 2011, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[36]  C. C. Law,et al.  ParaView: An End-User Tool for Large-Data Visualization , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.

[37]  W. Reardon,et al.  Craniosynostosis. Diagnosis, evaluation and management. , 2000, Journal of medical genetics.

[38]  J. Richtsmeier,et al.  New insights into the relationship between suture closure and craniofacial dysmorphology in sagittal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis , 2010, Journal of anatomy.

[39]  J. Fearon,et al.  Sagittal Craniosynostosis: Surgical Outcomes and Long-Term Growth , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[40]  Roman Rosipal,et al.  Overview and Recent Advances in Partial Least Squares , 2005, SLSFS.

[41]  Eric Arnaud,et al.  Scaphocephaly: Part I: Indices for Scaphocephalic Frontal and Occipital Morphology Evaluation: Long-Term Results , 2009, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[42]  Richard C E Anderson,et al.  Surgical treatment of single-suture craniosynostosis: an argument for quantitative methods to evaluate cosmetic outcomes. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics.

[43]  Maxime Sermesant,et al.  How successful is successful? Aortic arch shape after successful aortic coarctation repair correlates with left ventricular function , 2017, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[44]  A. Wray,et al.  Delayed Sagittal Sinus Tear: A Complication of Spring Cranioplasty for Sagittal Craniosynostosis , 2012, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[45]  J. Levine,et al.  Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery: The New State of the Art , 2012, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[46]  Edward P. Buchanan,et al.  Review of quantitative outcome analysis of cranial morphology in craniosynostosis. , 2016, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[47]  Carlos S. Mendoza,et al.  Personalized assessment of craniosynostosis via statistical shape modeling , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[48]  Joan Alexis Glaunès,et al.  Surface Matching via Currents , 2005, IPMI.

[49]  David A. Steinman,et al.  An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[50]  Silvia Schievano,et al.  Spring Assisted Cranioplasty for the Correction of Non-Syndromic Scaphocephaly: A Quantitative Analysis of 100 consecutive cases , 2016 .

[51]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Computing Large Deformation Metric Mappings via Geodesic Flows of Diffeomorphisms , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[52]  I. Mathijssen,et al.  Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis , 2015, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[53]  Phillip B Storm,et al.  Spring-mediated sagittal craniosynostosis treatment at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: technical notes and literature review. , 2015, Neurosurgical focus.

[54]  Clifford Ruff,et al.  Using principal component analysis to describe the Apert skull deformity and simulate its correction. , 2012, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[55]  R. Hayward,et al.  Are routine preoperative CT scans necessary in the management of single suture craniosynostosis? , 2002, British journal of neurosurgery.

[56]  Lisa M Morris,et al.  Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis and Deformational Head Shape Disorders. , 2016, Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America.

[57]  A. Trouvé,et al.  Comparison of the endocranial ontogenies between chimpanzees and bonobos via temporal regression and spatiotemporal registration. , 2012, Journal of human evolution.

[58]  Silvia Schievano,et al.  Spring-Assisted Cranioplasty for the Correction of Nonsyndromic Scaphocephaly: A Quantitative Analysis of 100 Consecutive Cases , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.