The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the "Other"

This paper examines the promise of empathy, the name commonly given to the initial phase of the human-centered design process in which designers seek to understand their intended users in order to inform technology development. By analyzing popular empathy activities aimed at understanding people with disabilities, we examine the ways empathy works to both powerfully and problematically align designers with the values of people who may use their products. Drawing on disability studies and feminist theorizing, we describe how acts of empathy building may further distance people with disabilities from the processes designers intend to draw them into. We end by reimagining empathy as guided by the lived experiences of people with disabilities who are traditionally positioned as those to be empathized.

[1]  Kathleen Stewart,et al.  Atmospheric Attunements , 2011 .

[2]  S. Lanzoni,et al.  An Epistemology of the Clinic: Ludwig Binswanger’s Phenomenology of the Other , 2003, Critical Inquiry.

[3]  Alison Kafer,et al.  Feminist, Queer, Crip , 2013 .

[4]  Matthew Reason,et al.  Kinesthesia, Empathy, and Related Pleasures: An Inquiry into Audience Experiences of Watching Dance , 2010, Dance Research Journal.

[5]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Critical Fabulations: Reworking the Methods and Margins of Design , 2018 .

[6]  N. Painter,et al.  Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America , 1998 .

[7]  Trenton Schulz,et al.  Creating Personas with Disabilities , 2012, ICCHP.

[8]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  Change my body, change my mind: the effects of illusory ownership of an outgroup hand on implicit attitudes toward that outgroup , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[9]  Sareeta Amrute,et al.  Encoding Race, Encoding Class: Indian IT Workers in Berlin , 2016 .

[10]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias , 2013, Cognition.

[11]  Eva Brandt,et al.  Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design , 2000 .

[12]  Vinciane Despret.  The Body We Care for: Figures of Anthropo-zoo-genesis , 2004 .

[13]  Peter Richard Gill,et al.  Walking the Fine Line between Fieldwork Success and Failure: Advice for New Ethnographers. , 2014 .

[14]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Empathy and experience in HCI , 2008, CHI.

[15]  Rebecca Garden,et al.  The Problem of Empathy: Medicine and the Humanities , 2007 .

[16]  Ann Light.  The Nature of ‘Obligation’ in Doing Design with Communities: Participation, Politics and Care , 2019, Tricky Design.

[17]  Hamid Noori,et al.  Developing breakthrough products: challenges and options for market assessment , 1999 .

[18]  K. Tallbear,et al.  Standing With and Speaking as Faith: A Feminist-Indigenous Approach to Inquiry , 2014 .

[19]  Jentery Sayers,et al.  Prototyping the Past , 2015 .

[20]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Virtual race transformation reverses racial in-group bias , 2017, PloS one.

[21]  Lilly Irani,et al.  “Design Thinking”: Defending Silicon Valley at the Apex of Global Labor Hierarchies , 2018 .

[22]  Sara Ahmed,et al.  The Promise of Happiness , 2010 .

[23]  S. Burgstahler,et al.  Disability-related Simulations: If, When, and How to Use Them in Professional Development , 2004 .

[24]  Åsa Ståhl,et al.  Becoming response-able stakeholders: participatory design in times of uncertainties , 2016, PDC.

[25]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Participatory Design that Matters—Facing the Big Issues , 2018, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[26]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[27]  Christopher Frauenberger,et al.  When Empathy Is Not Enough: Assessing the Experiences of Autistic Children with Technologies , 2017, CHI.

[28]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Utopias of Participation , 2018, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[29]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Does the Mask Govern the Mind?: Effects of Arbitrary Gender Representation on Quantitative Task Performance in Avatar-Represented Virtual Groups , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[30]  Patrick Anderson.  I Feel for You , 2012 .

[31]  Karrie Karahalios,et al.  ACES: promoting empathy towards aphasia through language distortion emulation software , 2011, CHI.

[32]  Carolyn Pedwell,et al.  Affective Relations: The Transnational Politics of Empathy , 2014 .

[33]  Christopher Frauenberger,et al.  Empowering people with impairments: how participatory methods can inform the design of empowering artifacts , 2016, PDC.

[34]  Louise Owen,et al.  Neoliberalism and Global Theatres: Performance Permutations , 2014 .

[35]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Reimagining participatory design , 2018, Interactions.

[36]  Vinciane Despret,et al.  Responding Bodies and Partial Affinities in Human–Animal Worlds , 2013 .

[37]  Tara J. Yosso,et al.  Critical Race Methodology: Counter-Storytelling as an Analytical Framework for Education Research , 2002 .

[38]  Gary Kiger,et al.  Disability Simulations: Logical, Methodological and Ethical Issues , 1992 .

[39]  Hua Dong,et al.  Empathy in Design: A Historical and Cross-Disciplinary Perspective , 2017, AHFE.

[40]  Oussama Metatla,et al.  “Bursting the Assistance Bubble”: Designing Inclusive Technology with Children with Mixed Visual Abilities , 2018, CHI.

[41]  Sareeta Amrute,et al.  Of Techno-Ethics and Techno-Affects , 2019, Feminist Review.

[42]  Christopher Frauenberger,et al.  Blending Methods: Developing Participatory Design Sessions for Autistic Children , 2017, IDC.

[43]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Stumbling in Their Shoes , 2015 .

[44]  Hannah L. Stevens,et al.  Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability , 2019, Technical Communication Quarterly.

[45]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  Inclusive design toolkit , 2007 .

[46]  Jentery Sayers,et al.  Optophonic Reading, Prototyping Optophones , 2018 .

[47]  Maria Puig De La Bellacasa,et al.  ‘Nothing Comes Without Its World’: Thinking with Care , 2012 .

[48]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[49]  Tabitha C. Peck,et al.  Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[50]  Michelle R Nario-Redmond,et al.  Crip for a Day: The Unintended Negative Consequences of Disability Simulations , 2017, Rehabilitation psychology.

[51]  Joan McComas,et al.  Using Virtual Reality to Teach Disability Awareness , 2002 .

[52]  Deborah Kartin,et al.  Instilling positive beliefs about disabilities: pilot testing a novel experiential learning activity for rehabilitation students , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation.

[53]  S. French,et al.  Simulation Exercises in Disability Awareness Training: A Critique , 1992 .

[54]  Ingunn Moser,et al.  Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal , 2006 .

[55]  Fernando Domínguez Rubio,et al.  Unfolding the political capacities of design , 2015 .

[56]  Ethan Chang,et al.  Disruptive fixation: school reform and the pitfalls of techno-idealism , 2017 .

[57]  Sarah Fox,et al.  Maintaining the Menstruating Body: Feminist Interventions on Care Resources , 2018 .

[58]  Jeremy Myerson,et al.  Design and wellbeing: Bridging the empathy gap between neurotypical designers and autistic adults , 2014 .

[59]  Marcos Daniel Moldes,et al.  That's Revolting: Queer Strategies for Resisting Assimilation , 2006 .

[60]  Sara Ahmed.  The Cultural Politics of Emotion , 2004 .

[61]  Don Koberg,et al.  The Universal Traveler, A Soft-Systems Guide to: Creativity, Problem Solving, and the Process of Reaching Goals. [Revised Edition.]. , 1974 .

[62]  M. Six Silberman,et al.  Stories We Tell About Labor: Turkopticon and the Trouble with "Design" , 2016, CHI.

[63]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Politics of mattering in the practices of participatory design , 2018, PDC.

[64]  A. Tsing,et al.  The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins , 2017 .

[65]  María Puig de la Bellacasa.  Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things , 2011, Social studies of science.