Demonstration of steady inductive helicity injection

Initial results demonstrating the concept of constant inductive helicity injection are presented. Constant helicity injection is achieved using two oscillating inductive helicity injectors, with the goal of producing a bow tie spheromak. Each injector is a 180° segment of a reverse field pinch and they are driven 90° out of phase. Approximately 5 MW of power is injected during the 6 ms pulse, and the input power has been maintained at a fairly constant value by directly fuelling the injectors with neutral gas. Motivation for the experiment is given, including beta-limit calculations for the bow tie spheromak. Fuelling the injectors with neutral gas during the discharge is shown to produce injector parameters that are more constant in time. A series of discharges with increasing power input shows a promising increase in toroidal current. Unique construction techniques of the experiment are also described.

[1]  J B Taylor,et al.  Relaxation and magnetic reconnection in plasmas , 1986 .

[2]  C. Barnes,et al.  A Re-Examination of Spheromak Experiments and Opportunities , 1996 .

[3]  Nathaniel J. Fisch,et al.  Theory of current-drive in plasmas , 1987 .

[4]  Wysocki,et al.  Evidence for a pressure-driven instability in the CTX spheromak. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[5]  W. T. Hamp,et al.  Initial studies of steady inductive helicity injection on the HIT-SI experiment , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[6]  T. Fowler.  Theoretical aspects of energy confinement in spheromaks , 1994 .

[7]  Wysocki,et al.  Improved energy confinement in spheromaks with reduced field errors. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[8]  Greene,et al.  Steady-state tokamak discharge via dc helicity injection. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[9]  C. Barnes,et al.  Energy confinement studies in spheromaks with mesh flux conservers , 1988 .

[10]  A. Mattick,et al.  Results from current drive experiments on the Helicity Injected Torus , 1998 .

[11]  S. Jardin,et al.  Stabilizing windings for the tilting and shifting modes in an inductively formed spheromak , 1981 .

[12]  R. Grimm,et al.  A numerical study of the generation of an azimuthal current in a plasma cylinder using a transverse rotating magnetic field , 1981, Journal of Plasma Physics.

[13]  L. Woltjer,et al.  A THEOREM ON FORCE-FREE MAGNETIC FIELDS. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  A. Boozer.  Power requirements for current drive , 1988 .

[15]  Stewart C. Prager,et al.  High current plasma electron emitter , 1995 .

[16]  J. Sprott,et al.  Transport reduction by current profile control in the reversed-field pinch , 1994 .

[17]  Juan C Fernández,et al.  The m=1 helicity source spheromak experiment , 1989 .

[18]  C. Barnes,et al.  Experimental determination of the conservation of magnetic helicity from the balance between source and spheromak , 1986 .

[19]  A. Hoffman.  Flux buildup in field reversed configurations using rotating magnetic fields , 1998 .

[20]  Thomas R. Jarboe,et al.  Review of spheromak research , 1994 .

[21]  Thomas R. Jarboe,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the Helicity Injected Torus with Steady Inductive drivea) , 2005 .

[22]  R. L. Hagenson,et al.  Steady-State Spheromak Reactor Studies , 1985 .

[23]  I. Jones,et al.  Compact Torus Configuration Generated by a Rotating Magnetic Field: The Rotamak , 1980 .

[24]  T. Jarboe.  Steady inductive helicity injection and its application to a high-beta spheromak , 1999 .

[25]  U. Shumlak,et al.  Stable high beta spheromak equilibria using concave flux conservers , 2000 .

[26]  B. Alper,et al.  A model for the loop voltage of reversed field pinches , 1987 .

[27]  Juan C Fernández,et al.  Progress with energy confinement time in the CTX spheromak , 1990 .

[28]  W. Hugrass,et al.  Steady-state solutions for the penetration of a rotating magnetic field into a plasma column , 1981, Journal of Plasma Physics.

[29]  L. Berry,et al.  Some observations on maximum densities in tokamak experiments , 1976 .

[30]  M. G. Rusbridge,et al.  Structure of the n = 1 mode responsible for relaxation and current drive during sustainment of the SPHEX spheromak , 1997 .

[31]  Wright,et al.  Observations of spheromak equilibria which differ from the minimum-energy state and have internal kink distortions. , 1986, Physical review letters.

[32]  R. Grimm,et al.  Tilting and shifting modes in a spheromak , 1981 .

[33]  Thomas R. Jarboe,et al.  Formation and steady-state sustainment of a tokamak by coaxial helicity injection , 1989 .

[34]  T. Jarboe,et al.  A numerical assessment of the Lundquist number requirement for relaxation current drive , 2003 .