Probing the Reproducibility of Leaf Growth and Molecular Phenotypes: A Comparison of Three Arabidopsis Accessions Cultivated in Ten Laboratories1[W]

A major goal of the life sciences is to understand how molecular processes control phenotypes. Because understanding biological systems relies on the work of multiple laboratories, biologists implicitly assume that organisms with the same genotype will display similar phenotypes when grown in comparable conditions. We investigated to what extent this holds true for leaf growth variables and metabolite and transcriptome profiles of three Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes grown in 10 laboratories using a standardized and detailed protocol. A core group of four laboratories generated similar leaf growth phenotypes, demonstrating that standardization is possible. But some laboratories presented significant differences in some leaf growth variables, sometimes changing the genotype ranking. Metabolite profiles derived from the same leaf displayed a strong genotype × environment (laboratory) component. Genotypes could be separated on the basis of their metabolic signature, but only when the analysis was limited to samples derived from one laboratory. Transcriptome data revealed considerable plant-to-plant variation, but the standardization ensured that interlaboratory variation was not considerably larger than intralaboratory variation. The different impacts of the standardization on phenotypes and molecular profiles could result from differences of temporal scale between processes involved at these organizational levels. Our findings underscore the challenge of describing, monitoring, and precisely controlling environmental conditions but also demonstrate that dedicated efforts can result in reproducible data across multiple laboratories. Finally, our comparative analysis revealed that small variations in growing conditions (light quality principally) and handling of plants can account for significant differences in phenotypes and molecular profiles obtained in independent laboratories.

[1]  S. Wilkinson.  PH as a stress signal , 1999, Plant Growth Regulation.

[2]  B. Shipley.  Plasticity in relative growth rate and its components following a change in irradiance , 2000 .

[3]  T. Pons,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity and growth temperature: understanding interspecific variability. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[4]  L Nardi,et al.  Plant Genome Size Estimation by Flow Cytometry: Inter-laboratory Comparison , 1998 .

[5]  D. R. Hoagland,et al.  The Water-Culture Method for Growing Plants Without Soil , 2018 .

[6]  C. Granier,et al.  Plasticity to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana: dissection of leaf development into underlying growth dynamic and cellular variables reveals invisible phenotypes. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[7]  Lennart Martens,et al.  The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE) , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Karine Chenu,et al.  Individual leaf development in Arabidopsis thaliana: a stable thermal-time-based programme. , 2002, Annals of botany.

[9]  A. Fernie,et al.  Metabolite profiling: from diagnostics to systems biology , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[10]  O. Fiehn,et al.  Process for the integrated extraction, identification and quantification of metabolites, proteins and RNA to reveal their co‐regulation in biochemical networks , 2004, Proteomics.

[11]  Yves Gibon,et al.  Integration of metabolite with transcript and enzyme activity profiling during diurnal cycles in Arabidopsis rosettes , 2006, Genome Biology.

[12]  François Tardieu,et al.  Dealing with the genotype x environment interaction via a modelling approach: a comparison of QTLs of maize leaf length or width with QTLs of model parameters. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[13]  E. Goto,et al.  Growth of rice plants under red light with or without supplemental blue light , 2006 .

[14]  I. Kataoka,et al.  Effect of red- and blue-light-emitting diodes on growth and morphogenesis of grapes , 2008, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[15]  D. Inzé,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis of Gene Expression Profiles Associated with Cell Cycle Transitions in Growing Organs of Arabidopsis1[w] , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[16]  Christine Granier,et al.  Combined Genetic and Modeling Approaches Reveal That Epidermal Cell Area and Number in Leaves Are Controlled by Leaf and Plant Developmental Processes in Arabidopsis1[W] , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[17]  Z. Rengel,et al.  Micronutrient Deficiency Influences Plant Growth and Activities of Superoxide Dismutases in Narrow-leafed Lupins , 1999 .

[18]  E. Ober,et al.  Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Beta vulgaris. , 2002, Annals of botany.

[19]  G. Wasteneys,et al.  Remodeling the cytoskeleton for growth and form: an overview with some new views. , 2003, Annual review of plant biology.

[20]  Joachim Selbig,et al.  Identification of metabolic and biomass QTL in Arabidopsis thaliana in a parallel analysis of RIL and IL populations , 2007, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[21]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the combined effects of temperature, evaporative demand and light on leaf elongation rate in well-watered field and laboratory-grown maize plants , 1996 .

[22]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Leaf growth under water-limited conditions. , 2006 .

[23]  C. Granier,et al.  A dynamic analysis of the shade-induced plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana rosette leaf development reveals new components of the shade-adaptative response. , 2006, Annals of botany.

[24]  Helen Parkinson,et al.  MIAME/Plant – adding value to plant microarrray experiments , 2006, Plant Methods.

[25]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[26]  D. Inzé,et al.  Dominant negative mutants of the Cdc2 kinase uncouple cell division from iterative plant development. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[27]  P. Hussey,et al.  Control of the actin cytoskeleton in plant cell growth. , 2006, Annual review of plant biology.

[28]  Klaas Vandepoele,et al.  Unraveling Transcriptional Control in Arabidopsis Using cis-Regulatory Elements and Coexpression Networks1[C][W] , 2009, Plant Physiology.

[29]  L. Stein,et al.  Plant Ontology (PO): a Controlled Vocabulary of Plant Structures and Growth Stages , 2005, Comparative and functional genomics.

[30]  K. Chenu,et al.  PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[31]  M. Brancourt-Hulmel,et al.  Using genotype × nitrogen interaction variables to evaluate the QTL involved in wheat tolerance to nitrogen constraints , 2007, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[32]  E. Schäfer,et al.  Nucleocytoplasmic Partitioning of the Plant Photoreceptors Phytochrome A, B, C, D, and E Is Regulated Differentially by Light and Exhibits a Diurnal Rhythm Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.001156. , 2002, The Plant Cell Online.

[33]  H. Tsukaya,et al.  Cell cycling and cell enlargement in developing leaves of Arabidopsis. , 1999, Developmental biology.

[34]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Multi-scale phenotyping of leaf expansion in response to environmental changes: the whole is more than the sum of parts. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[35]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Expansion of pea leaves subjected to short water deficit: cell number and cell size are sensitive to stress at different periods of leaf development , 1995 .

[36]  E. Schäfer,et al.  Nucleo-cytoplasmic partitioning of the plant photoreceptors phytochromes. , 2000, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[37]  Jason E. Stewart,et al.  Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[38]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[39]  M. Dingkuhn,et al.  Variability of phyllochron, plastochron and rate of increase in height in photoperiod-sensitive sorghum varieties. , 2008, Annals of botany.

[40]  A. Fernie,et al.  Gas chromatography mass spectrometry–based metabolite profiling in plants , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[41]  Sebastian Bohl,et al.  Standardizing experimental protocols. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[42]  J. Görlach,et al.  Growth Stage–Based Phenotypic Analysis of Arabidopsis , 2001, The Plant Cell Online.

[43]  Karine Chenu,et al.  Day length affects the dynamics of leaf expansion and cellular development in Arabidopsis thaliana partially through floral transition timing. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[44]  G. Horiguchi,et al.  Analysis of Leaf Development in fugu Mutants of Arabidopsis Reveals Three Compensation Modes That Modulate Cell Expansion in Determinate Organs1[W] , 2007, Plant Physiology.

[45]  P. M. Neumann,et al.  Mineral nutrient supply, cell wall adjustment and the control of leaf growth , 1997 .

[46]  Stefan R. Henz,et al.  AGRONOMICS1: A New Resource for Arabidopsis Transcriptome Profiling1[W][OA] , 2009, Plant Physiology.

[47]  F. Stoddard,et al.  Evaluation of physiological traits for improving drought tolerance in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) , 2007, Plant and Soil.

[48]  Danielle J. Marceau,et al.  Modeling complex ecological systems: an introduction , 2002 .

[49]  Dirk Inzé,et al.  Cell cycle regulation in plant development. , 2006, Annual review of genetics.

[50]  T. Sinclair,et al.  The effect of pot size on growth and transpiration of maize and soybean during water deficit stress , 1998 .