Robotics integration to create an authentic learning environment in engineering education

Authentic education, which connects the lessons with students' real-lives and their prior knowledge, has the potential to create meaningful learning environments in which students see the lessons as meaningful, useful, and relevant. However, in undergraduate engineering programs, subject matter are usually irrelevant to students' real-lives. Such disconnections might demotivate students, resulting in a lack of qualifications for entering 21st century job market. I, as a robotics instructor, witnessed that robotics has the potential to create motivating authentic learning environments for students who are studying in the field of electrical and computer engineering. This study aims at inspiring other educators to integrate robotics into their teaching activities in order to contextualize the typically decontextualized subject matters in undergraduate electrical and computer engineering programs.

[1]  Elizabeth Sklar,et al.  Using educational robotics to engage inner-city students with technology , 2004 .

[2]  Mark Gura,et al.  Lego Robotics: STEM Sport of the Mind. , 2012 .

[3]  Ahmad Khanlari EFFECTS OF ROBOTICS ON 21st CENTURY SKILLS , 2013 .

[4]  P. Samuels,et al.  Real and virtual robotics in mathematics education at the school–university transition , 2012 .

[5]  Christina Chalmers,et al.  Learning with FIRST LEGO League , 2013 .

[6]  Chris Rogers,et al.  Physics With Robotics - Using LEGO MINDSTORMS In High School Education , 2010, AAAI Spring Symposium: Educational Robotics and Beyond.

[7]  Chalmers Chris,et al.  Learning with FIRST LEGO League , 2013 .

[8]  Ahmad Khanlari,et al.  Teachers’ perceptions of the benefits and the challenges of integrating educational robots into primary/elementary curricula , 2016 .

[9]  D. Vernon,et al.  Development and Learning , 2014 .

[10]  Vikram Kapila,et al.  Using robotics to promote learning in elementary grades , 2012 .

[11]  W. Wardekker,et al.  On becoming an authentic learner: Semiotic activity in the early grades , 1999 .

[12]  Stephanie Bell Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future , 2010 .

[13]  C. Schunn,et al.  Engagement and Achievements: A Case Study of Design-Based Learning in a Science Context. , 2008 .

[14]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Teaching Partnerships: Early Childhood and Engineering Students Teaching Math and Science Through Robotics , 2005 .

[15]  Matthew C. Jadud TeamStorms as a theory of instruction , 2000, Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0.

[16]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Technological prayers: parents and children exploring robotics and values , 2000 .

[17]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology , 2006 .

[18]  Reginald Botshabeng Monyai Adult Learning: From Theory to Practice in the Online Classroom , 2018 .

[19]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Project InterActions: A Multigenerational Robotic Learning Environment , 2007 .

[20]  George Calhoun Piaget's Theory of Development. , 1977 .

[21]  M. Resnick,et al.  Programmable Bricks: Toys to Think With , 1996, IBM Syst. J..

[22]  M. Scardamalia Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge , 2002 .

[23]  Merredith Portsmore,et al.  Bringing Engineering to Elementary School , 2004 .

[24]  Michael E. Grubbs Robotics Intrigue Middle School Students and Build STEM Skills , 2013 .