The role of working memory abilities in lecture note-taking

Abstract The utility of lecture note-taking is well documented, with most studies dedicated to understanding how to maximize the benefits of note-taking. Far less attention has been focused on understanding the cognitive processes that underlie note-taking and how the benefits of note-taking vary with individual differences in the ability to carry out these processes. One cognitive ability that has been hypothesized to be important for note-taking is working memory: the ability to temporarily store and manipulate limited amounts of information. The current paper addresses why working memory is important for lecture note-taking and reviews studies that have examined the relationship between individual differences in working memory abilities and individual differences in note-taking. There is currently a lack of consensus regarding the nature of this relationship, and this review addresses possible reasons for what may appear to be inconsistent results, including differences in how working memory and its role in note-taking have been assessed, note-taking modality, and individual differences in note-taking strategy.

[1]  John R. Kirby,et al.  Individual Differences in Notetaking, Summarization, and Learning from Lectures , 1999, Alberta Journal of Educational Research.

[2]  John Wirt.  The Condition of Education , 2005 .

[3]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  Who is Likely to Acquire Programming Skills? , 1991 .

[4]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  N‐back working memory paradigm: A meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Lecture Notetaking, Information-Processing, and Academic Achievement , 1992 .

[6]  Stephen L. Benton,et al.  Qualitative aspects of notetaking and their relationship with information-processing ability and academic achievement. , 1987 .

[7]  John O. Willis,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition , 2014 .

[8]  Annie Piolat,et al.  Suppressing visual feedback in written composition: Effects on processing demands and coordination of the writing processes , 2002 .

[9]  Stephen L. Benton,et al.  Effects of Note-Taking Format and Study Technique on Recall and Relational Performance , 1995 .

[10]  S. Gathercole,et al.  Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Lars Bäckman,et al.  Transfer of Learning After Updating Training Mediated by the Striatum , 2008, Science.

[12]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Processing speed as a mental capacity. , 1994, Acta psychologica.

[13]  R. Youmans,et al.  Technology in Note Taking and Assessment: The Effects of Congruence on Student Performance. , 2014 .

[14]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[15]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination , 2003 .

[16]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Speed of processing in normal aging: effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[18]  A Baddeley,et al.  Working memory and the control of action: evidence from task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis , 2008, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[20]  J. Myerson,et al.  Contributions of Associative Learning to Age and Individual Differences in Fluid Intelligence. , 2012 .

[21]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Speech Rate and Syntactic Complexity as Multiplicative Factors in Speech Comprehension by Young and Older Adults , 2003 .

[22]  N. Cowan.  Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  L. R. Peterson,et al.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  T. Salthouse.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[25]  Crystal M. Ramsay,et al.  The Relationship of Handwriting Speed, Working Memory, Language Comprehension and Outlines to Lecture Note‐taking and Test‐taking among College Students , 2013 .

[26]  N. Unsworth,et al.  Working memory capacity: Attention control, secondary memory, or both? A direct test of the dual-component model , 2010 .

[27]  James Efaw,et al.  Miracle or Menace: Teaching and Learning with Laptop Computers in the Classroom , 2004 .

[28]  Sung-Il Kim,et al.  A more equitable account of the note-taking functions in learning from lecture and from text , 1989 .

[29]  Kenneth A. Kiewra.  Investigating Notetaking and Review: A Depth of Processing Alternative , 1985 .

[30]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[31]  Joel Myerson,et al.  Note-taking with computers: Exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. , 2013 .

[32]  M. Daneman,et al.  Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Patricia Dunkel,et al.  The heuristic of lecture notetaking: Perceptions of American & international students regarding the value & practice of notetaking , 1989 .

[34]  R. T. Kellogg,et al.  Cognitive effort during note taking , 2005 .

[35]  A. Baddeley.  Working Memory, Thought, and Action , 2007 .

[36]  M. Harris,et al.  Effect of Note Taking and Review on Recall. , 1973 .

[37]  Mitchell Sommers,et al.  The structure of working memory abilities across the adult life span. , 2011, Psychology and aging.

[38]  C. Marlin “Lin” Brown.  Comparison of Typing and Handwriting in “Two-Finger Typists” , 1988 .

[39]  E. G. Aiken,et al.  Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density. , 1975 .

[40]  Robert L. Williams,et al.  Notetaking in College Classes: Student Patterns and Instructional Strategies , 2003 .

[41]  Francis J. Di Vesta,et al.  Listening and Note Taking: II. Immediate and Delayed Recall as Functions of Variations in Thematic Continuity, Note Taking, and Length of Listening-Review Intervals. , 1973 .

[42]  K. Brobst,et al.  The process of integrating information from two sources, lecture and text. , 1996 .

[43]  N. Cowan.  Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[44]  D. Wechsler,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - fourth edition , 2012 .

[45]  T. Alloway,et al.  Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[46]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[47]  F. di Vesta,et al.  Listening and note taking. , 1972, Journal of educational psychology.

[48]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  E. Cohn,et al.  Notetaking, Working Memory, and Learning in Principles of Economics , 1995 .

[50]  John P. Rickards,et al.  The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking , 1978 .

[51]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Rereading Effects Depend on Time of Test. , 2005 .

[52]  Joel Myerson,et al.  Dual n-back training increases the capacity of the focus of attention , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[53]  Joanna K. Garner,et al.  Both handwriting speed and selective attention are important to lecture note-taking , 2014 .

[54]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Variation in working memory , 2008 .

[55]  R. Engle,et al.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[56]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  The test of everyday attention , 1994 .

[57]  C. Noble.  Verbal Learning and Individual Differences. , 1961 .

[58]  Donald L. Peters,et al.  Effects of note taking and rate of presentation on short-term objective test performance. , 1972 .

[59]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  A functional account of age differences in memory , 2016 .

[60]  Chris Singleton,et al.  Computerised assessment of handwriting and typing speed , 2011, Educational and Child Psychology.

[61]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[62]  P. Goldman-Rakic.  Regional and cellular fractionation of working memory. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  Thomas S. Redick,et al.  Is working memory training effective? , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[64]  Cinzia R. De Luca and Richard J. Leventer.  Developmental trajectories of executive functions across the lifespan , 2010 .

[65]  A. Miyake,et al.  Not All Executive Functions Are Related to Intelligence , 2006, Psychological science.

[66]  F. J. Vesta,et al.  What Is Learned in Note Taking , 1981 .

[67]  Virginia W. Berninger,et al.  Theory-Based Diagnosis and Remediation of Writing Disabilities. , 1991 .

[68]  K. Ruhl,et al.  The Pause Procedure and/or an Outline: Effect on Immediate Free Recall and Lecture Notes Taken by College Students with Learning Disabilities , 1995 .

[69]  Keiichi Kobayashi,et al.  Combined Effects of Note‐Taking/‐Reviewing on Learning and the Enhancement through Interventions: A meta‐analytic review , 2006 .

[70]  P. V. Meter,et al.  College Students' Theory of Note-Taking Derived From Their Perceptions of Note-Taking , 1994 .

[71]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The Psychology of Learning and Motivation , 1974 .

[72]  Terence J. Crooks,et al.  Student note-taking related to university examination performance , 1984 .

[73]  Barbara S. Plake,et al.  Cognitive capacity differences among writers , 1984 .

[74]  Thomas S. Redick,et al.  Complex span and n-back measures of working memory: A meta-analysis , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[75]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[76]  L. F. Annis,et al.  The Effect of Encoding and an External Memory Device on Note Taking , 1975 .

[77]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[78]  R. Engle,et al.  On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[79]  Joanna K. Garner,et al.  What predicts skill in lecture note taking , 2007 .

[80]  David C. Caverly,et al.  Handbook of College Reading and Study Strategy Research , 2000 .

[81]  Nelson F. DuBois,et al.  Note-taking functions and techniques. , 1991 .

[82]  R. Colom,et al.  Complex span tasks, simple span tasks, and cognitive abilities: A reanalysis of key studies , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[83]  A. Baddeley.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[84]  R. Case,et al.  Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span , 1982 .

[85]  C. C. Crawford.  Some experimental studies of the results of college note-taking. , 1925 .

[86]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[87]  Janet Rogers,et al.  Relationships between handwriting and keyboarding performance of sixth-grade students. , 2002, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[88]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[89]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[90]  Bonnie B. Armbruster.  Taking notes from lectures. , 2000 .

[91]  Robert A. Palmatier,et al.  Notetaking Habits of College Students , 2016 .

[92]  J. Fuster.  Frontal lobe and cognitive development , 2002, Journal of neurocytology.

[93]  Stephen L. Benton,et al.  The relationship between information-processing ability and notetaking , 1988 .

[94]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[95]  S. Hale,et al.  Processing Speed, Working Memory, and Fluid Intelligence: Evidence for a Developmental Cascade , 1996 .

[96]  Keiichi Kobayashi,et al.  What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination , 2005 .

[97]  Roy Williams,et al.  The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC , 2010 .

[98]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[99]  John Brown.  Some Tests of the Decay Theory of Immediate Memory , 1958 .