Robust Linear Control of Nonlinear Flat Systems

Asymptotic estimation of external, unstructured, perturbation inputs, with the aim of exactly, or approximately, canceling their influences at the controller stage, has been treated in the existing literature under several headings. The outstanding work of professor C.D. Johnson in this respect, under the name of Disturbance Accommodation Control (DAC), dates from the nineteen seventies (see Johnson (1971)). Ever since, the theory and practical aspects of DAC theory have been actively evolving, as evidenced by the survey paper by Johnson Johnson (2008). The theory enjoys an interesting and useful extension to discrete-time systems, as demonstrated in the book chapter Johnson (1982). In a recent article, by Parker and Johnson Parker & Johnson (2009), an application of DAC is made to the problem of decoupling two nonlinearly coupled linear systems. An early application of disturbance accommodation control in the area of Power Systems is exemplified by the work of Mohadjer and Johnson in Mohadjer & Johnson (1983), where the operation of an interconnected power system is approached from the perspective of load frequency control. A closely related vein to DAC is represented by the sustained efforts of the late Professor Jingqing Han, summarized in the posthumous paper, Han Han (2009), and known as: Active Disturbance Estimation and Rejection (ADER). The numerous and original developments of Prof. Han, with many laboratory and industrial applications, have not been translated into English and his seminal contributions remain written in Chinese (see the references in Han (2009)). Although the main idea of observer-based disturbance estimation, and subsequent cancelation via the control law, is similar to that advocated in DAC, the emphasis in ADER lies, mainly, on nonlinear observer based disturbance estimation, with necessary developments related to: efficient time derivative computation, practical relative degree computation and nonlinear PID control extensions. The work, and inspiration, of Professor Han has found interesting developments and applications in the work of Professor Z. Gao and his colleagues ( see Gao et al. (2001), Gao (2006), also, in the work by Sun and Gao Sun & Gao (2005) and in the article by Sun Sun (2007)). In a recent article, a closely related idea, proposed by Prof. M. Fliess and C. Join in Fliess & Join (2008), is at the core of Intelligent PID Control(IPIDC). The mainstream of the IPIDC developments makes use of the Algebraic Method and it implies to resort to first order, or at most second order, non-phenomenological plant models. The interesting aspect of this method resides in using suitable algebraic manipulations to 20

[1]  David M. Auslander,et al.  Control and dynamic systems , 1970 .

[2]  Zhiqiang Gao,et al.  A DSP-based active disturbance rejection control design for a 1-kW H-bridge DC-DC power converter , 2005, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[3]  M. Fliess,et al.  Corps de Hardy et observateurs asymptotiques locaux pour systèmes différentiellement plats , 1997 .

[4]  C.D. Johnson,et al.  Real-Time Disturbance-Observers; Origin and Evolution of the Idea Part 1: The Early Years , 2008, 2008 40th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST).

[5]  Glenn A. Parker,et al.  Decoupling linear dynamical systems using disturbance accommodation control theory , 2009, 2009 41st Southeastern Symposium on System Theory.

[6]  H. Sira-Ramirez,et al.  On the output feedback control of a synchronous generator , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[7]  D. Luenberger An introduction to observers , 1971 .

[8]  M. Fliess,et al.  Intelligent PID controllers , 2008, 2008 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[9]  Mahmoud Mohadjer,et al.  Power system control with disturbance-accommodation , 1983, The 22nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Hebertt Sira-Ramírez,et al.  Synchronization of Chaotic oscillators by Means of Generalized Proportional Integral Observers , 2010, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[11]  Zhao Wang,et al.  Finite‐time tracking control of a nonholonomic mobile robot , 2009 .

[12]  M. Fliess,et al.  Nonlinear observability, identifiability, and persistent trajectories , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[13]  Yi Huang,et al.  An alternative paradigm for control system design , 2001 .

[14]  Zhiqiang Gao,et al.  Active disturbance rejection control: a paradigm shift in feedback control system design , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[15]  O. J. Sordalen,et al.  Exponential stabilization of mobile robots with nonholonomic constraints , 1992 .

[16]  Manfredi Maggiore,et al.  Output feedback tracking: a separation principle approach , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Jingqing Han,et al.  From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control , 2009, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[18]  Dong Sun,et al.  Comments on Active Disturbance Rejection Control , 2007, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[19]  Tarek Hamel,et al.  Robust path following control for wheeled robots via sliding mode techniques , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems. Innovative Robotics for Real-World Applications. IROS '97.

[20]  Jong-Hwan Kim,et al.  Sliding mode control for trajectory tracking of nonholonomic wheeled mobile robots , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[21]  Warren E. Dixon,et al.  Nonlinear Control of Wheeled Mobile Robots , 2001 .

[22]  William Leroquais,et al.  Modelling and Control of Wheeled Mobile Robots not Satisfying Ideal Velocity Constraints: The Unicycle Case , 1999, Eur. J. Control.

[23]  Jun-Ho Oh,et al.  Tracking control of a two-wheeled mobile robot using inputoutput linearization , 1999 .

[24]  Long Cheng,et al.  Adaptive Control of an Electrically Driven Nonholonomic Mobile Robot via Backstepping and Fuzzy Approach , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[25]  Cédric Join,et al.  Non-linear estimation is easy , 2007, Int. J. Model. Identif. Control..

[26]  Bosheng Sun,et al.  A DSP-based active disturbance rejection control design for a 1-kW H-bridge DC-DC power converter , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[27]  Yu-Ping Tian,et al.  Time‐varying linear controllers for exponential tracking of non‐holonomic systems in chained form , 2007 .

[28]  M. Fliess,et al.  Correcteurs proportionnels-intégraux généralisés , 2002 .

[29]  H. Sira-Ramírez,et al.  Robust GPI controller for trajectory tracking for induction motors , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics.

[30]  Béla Lantos,et al.  Advanced Robot Control , 2002 .

[31]  Petar V. Kokotovic,et al.  A dynamic extension for LgV controllers , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[32]  Vicente Feliú Batlle,et al.  Robust Σ–Δ modulation-based sliding mode observers for linear systems subject to time polynomial inputs , 2011, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[33]  Jean-Baptiste Pomet Explicit design of time-varying stabilizing control laws for a class of controllable systems without drift , 1992 .

[34]  C. D. Johnson,et al.  Accomodation of external disturbances in linear regulator and servomechanism problems , 1971 .

[35]  A dynamic extension for L/sub g/V controllers , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[36]  M. Pai Energy function analysis for power system stability , 1989 .

[37]  Masanori Sugisaka,et al.  Development of a proportional control method for a mobile robot , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..