Adaptive emulation-based reliability analysis

This paper presents an approximation method for performing reliability analysis with high fidelity computer codes at a reasonable computational cost. Complex models are common in science and engineering due to their ability to substitute costly and some times infeasible practical experiments. These models, however, suffer from high computational cost. This causes problems when performing sampling - based reliability analysis, since the failure modes of the system typically occupy a small region of the input space and thus relatively large sample sizes are required for the accurate estimation of their characteristics. The sequential sampling method proposed in this article, combines Gaussian process-based optimisation and Subset Simulation. Gaussian process emulators construct a statistical approximation to the output of the original code, which is both affordable to use and has its own measure of predictive uncertainty. Subset Simulation is used to efficiently populate those regions of the initial approximation which are likely to lead to the performance function exceeding a predefined critical threshold. Among all samples, the ones that are likely to contribute most to increasing the quality of the surrogate in the vicinity of the failure regions are selected, using Bayesian optimisation methods. The iterative nature of the method ensures that an arbitrarily accurate approximation of the failure region in performance space is developed at a reasonable computational cost. The presented method is applied to a number of benchmark problems.

[1]  N. Gayton,et al.  CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis , 2003 .

[2]  Pan Wang,et al.  Efficient structural reliability analysis method based on advanced Kriging model , 2015 .

[3]  B. Sudret,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation , 2011, 1104.3667.

[4]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[5]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[6]  Maurice Lemaire,et al.  Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and Support Vector Machines , 2011 .

[7]  George Michailidis,et al.  Sequential Experiment Design for Contour Estimation From Complex Computer Codes , 2008, Technometrics.

[8]  Yi Gao,et al.  Unified reliability analysis by active learning Kriging model combining with Random‐set based Monte Carlo simulation method , 2016 .

[9]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[10]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[11]  Hai Liu,et al.  A Sequential Kriging reliability analysis method with characteristics of adaptive sampling regions and parallelizability , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Ling Li,et al.  Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure , 2010, Statistics and Computing.

[13]  Hongping Zhu,et al.  Assessing small failure probabilities by AK–SS: An active learning method combining Kriging and Subset Simulation , 2016 .

[14]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[15]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Augmenting approximate solutions for consistent reliability analysis , 2007 .

[16]  Michael S. Eldred,et al.  Reliability-Based Design Optimization Using Efficient Global Reliability Analysis , 2009 .

[17]  C. S. Manohar,et al.  An improved response surface method for the determination of failure probability and importance measures , 2004 .

[18]  Tae Hee Lee,et al.  A sampling technique enhancing accuracy and efficiency of metamodel-based RBDO: Constraint boundary sampling , 2008 .

[19]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  Diagnostics for Gaussian Process Emulators , 2009, Technometrics.

[20]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Engineering Risk Assessment with Subset Simulation , 2014 .

[21]  Victor Picheny,et al.  Adaptive Designs of Experiments for Accurate Approximation of a Target Region , 2010 .

[22]  Jian Wang,et al.  LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Dian-Qing Li,et al.  A generalized surrogate response aided-subset simulation approach for efficient geotechnical reliability-based design , 2016 .

[24]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Accelerated subset simulation with neural networks for reliability analysis , 2012 .

[25]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.

[26]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  Uncertainty Propagation through Software Dependability Models , 2011, 2011 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering.

[27]  Zhili Sun,et al.  A hybrid algorithm for reliability analysis combining Kriging and subset simulation importance sampling , 2015 .

[28]  Guoshao Su,et al.  Gaussian Process Machine-Learning Method for Structural Reliability Analysis , 2014 .

[29]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Reliability Analysis With Monte Carlo Simulation and Dependent Kriging Predictions , 2016 .

[30]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Computational Approaches for Aerospace Design: The Pursuit of Excellence , 2005 .