Fostering Argumentation Skills in Mathematics with Adaptable Collaboration Scripts: Only Viable for Good Self-Regulators?

Argumentation scripts have been proposed as an effective means to structure students’ argumentation and to support their acquisition of argumentation skills. Yet, argumentation scripts run the danger of overscripting students’ argumentation. A possible solution might be to offer adaptable argumentation scripts that allow students to adjust the script to their own needs. This study compares the effects of three argumentation scripts (high structured vs. low structured vs. adaptable) on students’ argumentation skills. Furthermore, we investigate to what extent students’ self-regulation skills influence the acquisition of argumentation skills in the three conditions. N = 109 math students were randomized to the three treatment conditions and worked in dyads on mathematical proof tasks in a CSCL environment. Students’ argumentation skills increased between pre- and post-tests with comparable gains in all three conditions. Only for students learning with the adaptable argumentation script, self-regulation skills were a significant positive predictor for argumentation skills.

[1]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[2]  K. Koedinger,et al.  Using Intelligent Tutor Technology to Implement Adaptive Support for Student Collaboration , 2010 .

[3]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Student Differences in Self-Regulated Learning: Relating Grade, Sex, and Giftedness to Self-Efficacy and Strategy Use. , 1990 .

[4]  S. Järvelä,et al.  New Frontiers: Regulating Learning in CSCL , 2013 .

[5]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[6]  M. Fisher,et al.  Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. , 2001, Nurse education today.

[7]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[8]  Omid Noroozi,et al.  Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[9]  F. Fischer,et al.  Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis , 2006 .

[10]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Argumentation, Computer Support, and the Educational Context of Confronting Cognitions , 2003 .

[11]  S. Derry,et al.  Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research , 2000 .

[12]  M. Segers,et al.  The Relation Between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge , 1999 .

[13]  F. Fischer,et al.  Effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the acquisition of mathematical argumentation skills of teacher students with different levels of prior achievement , 2014 .

[14]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Recalibrating reference within a dual-space interaction environment , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..