Complexity and power in case-control association studies.

A general method is described for estimation of the power and sample size of studies relating a dichotomous phenotype to multiple interacting loci and environmental covariates. Either a simple case-control design or more complex stratified sampling may be used. The method can be used to design individual studies, to evaluate the power of alternative test statistics for complex traits, and to examine general questions of study design through explicit scenarios. The method is used here to study how the power of association tests is affected by problems of allelic heterogeneity and to investigate the potential role for collective testing of sets of related candidate genes in the presence of locus heterogeneity. The results indicate that allele-discovery efforts are crucial and that omnibus tests or collective testing of alleles can be substantially more powerful than separate testing of individual allelic variants. Joint testing of multiple candidate loci can also dramatically improve power, despite model misspecification and inclusion of irrelevant loci, but requires an a priori hypothesis defining the set of loci to investigate.

[1]  Steven G. Self,et al.  Power Calculations for Likelihood Ratio Tests in Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[2]  A. Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[3]  B W Brown,et al.  Asymptotic power calculations: description, examples, computer code. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  K. Roeder,et al.  The power of genomic control. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  J. Pritchard,et al.  Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  N. Schork,et al.  Selected Methodological Issues in Meiotic Mapping of Obesity Genes in Humans: Issues of Power and Efficiency , 1997, Behavior genetics.

[7]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[8]  K. Roeder,et al.  Genomic Control for Association Studies , 1999, Biometrics.

[9]  J. Hayes,et al.  Polymorphism in cytochrome P450 CYP2D6, CYP1A1, CYP2E1 and glutathione S-transferase, GSTM1, GSTM3, GSTT1 and susceptibility to tobacco-related cancers: studies in upper aerodigestive tract cancers. , 1998, Pharmacogenetics.

[10]  V. Vieland,et al.  Effect of allelic heterogeneity on the power of the transmission disequilibrium test , 2000, Genetic epidemiology.

[11]  J. Witte,et al.  Genetic dissection of complex traits. , 1994, Nature genetics.

[12]  L. Heston,et al.  Delineation of genetic predisposition to multifactorial disease: a general approach on the threshold of feasibility. , 1992, Genomics.

[13]  S Greenland,et al.  Power, sample size and smallest detectable effect determination for multivariate studies. , 1985, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  N. Schork,et al.  The future of genetic case-control studies. , 2001, Advances in genetics.

[15]  N Risch,et al.  The Future of Genetic Studies of Complex Human Diseases , 1996, Science.

[16]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research: volume 1- The analysis of case-control studies , 1980 .

[17]  Timothy B. Stockwell,et al.  The Sequence of the Human Genome , 2001, Science.

[18]  John M. Chambers,et al.  Programming With Data , 1998 .