Impact of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation on perioperative intravenous fluid management in coronary artery bypass surgery

Objective: Compare the use of blood products and intravenous fluid management in patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass surgery and randomized to minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) and conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC). Methods: A total of 240 patients who were scheduled for their first on-pump CABG, were randomized to MiECC or CECC groups. The study period was the first 84 hours after surgery. Hemoglobin <80 g/l was used as transfusion trigger. Results: Red blood cell transfusions intraoperatively were given less often in the MiECC group (23.3% vs 9.2%, p = 0.005) and the total intravenous fluid intake was significantly lower in the MiECC group (3300 ml [2950–4000] vs 4800 ml [4000–5500], p < 0.001). Hemoglobin drop also was lower in the MiECC group (35.5 ± 8.9 g/l vs 50.7 ± 9 g/l, p < 0.001) as was hemoglobin drop percent (25.3 ± 6% vs 35.3 ± 5.9%, p < 0.001). Chest tube drainage output was higher in the MiECC group (645 ml [500–917.5] vs 550 ml [412.5–750], p = 0.001). Particularly, chest tube drainage in up to 600 ml category, was in benefit of CECC group (59.1% vs 40.8%, p = 0.003). ROC curve analysis showed that patients with hemoglobin level below 95 g/l upon arrival to intensive care unit was associated with increased risk of developing postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (p = 0.002, auc = 0.61, cutoff <95, sensitivity = 0.47, positive predictive value = 0.64). Conclusion: MiECC reduced the intraoperative need for RBC transfusion and intravenous fluids compared to the CECC group, also reducing hemoglobin drop compared to the CECC group in CABG surgery patients. Postoperative hemoglobin drop was a predictor of POAF.

[1]  J. Hartikainen,et al.  Impact of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation on atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2020, Artificial organs.

[2]  Seil Oh,et al.  Impact of Hemoglobin Levels and Their Dynamic Changes on the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Population-Based Study , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[3]  T. Gudbjartsson,et al.  2019 EACTS/EACTA/EBCP guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. , 2019, British journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  J. Hartikainen,et al.  Impact of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation on the need of red blood cell transfusion , 2019, Perfusion.

[5]  G. Faggian,et al.  Bleeding, transfusion and the risk of stroke after coronary surgery: A prospective cohort study of 2357 patients. , 2016, International journal of surgery.

[6]  J. Schaarschmidt,et al.  Use of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: principles, definitions and potential benefits. A position paper from the Minimal invasive Extra-Corporeal Technologies international Society (MiECTiS). , 2016, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[7]  K. Anastasiadis,et al.  Modular minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation systems; can they become the standard practice for performing cardiac surgery? , 2015, Perfusion.

[8]  F. Sellke,et al.  Universal definition of perioperative bleeding in adult cardiac surgery. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  G. Whitman,et al.  Blood transfusions in cardiac surgery: indications, risks, and conservation strategies. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  A. Haidich,et al.  Use of minimal extracorporeal circulation improves outcome after heart surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[11]  T. Hájek,et al.  Are minimized perfusion circuits the better heart lung machines? Final results of a prospective randomized multicentre study , 2011, Perfusion.

[12]  A. Darzi,et al.  Do Miniaturized Extracorporeal Circuits Confer Significant Clinical Benefit Without Compromising Safety? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2011, ASAIO journal.

[13]  C. Asteriou,et al.  Haematological effects of minimized compared to conventional extracorporeal circulation after coronary revascularization procedures , 2010, Perfusion.

[14]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass improves short-term outcome in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  U. Benedetto,et al.  Is minimized extracorporeal circulation effective to reduce the need for red blood cell transfusion in coronary artery bypass grafting? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  R. Emery,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting with a minimized cardiopulmonary bypass circuit: a prospective, randomized trial. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  Chris A Rogers,et al.  Increased Mortality, Postoperative Morbidity, and Cost After Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients Having Cardiac Surgery , 2007, Circulation.

[18]  I. C. Tudor,et al.  Impact of Preoperative Anemia on Outcome in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery , 2007, Circulation.

[19]  K. Hosokawa,et al.  Predictors of atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  Liang Li,et al.  Morbidity and mortality risk associated with red blood cell and blood-component transfusion in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[21]  M. Borger,et al.  Low hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with increased risk of perioperative stroke in cardiac surgery. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  Ulf Abdel-Rahman,et al.  Initial experience with a minimized extracorporeal bypass system: is there a clinical benefit? , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[23]  V. Rao,et al.  Hemodilution during cardiopulmonary bypass is an independent risk factor for acute renal failure in adult cardiac surgery. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  W. Boden,et al.  Impact of fluid balance on incidence of atrial fibrillation after cardiothoracic surgery. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  A. Liebold,et al.  Four years' experience with a miniaturized extracorporeal circulation system and its influence on clinical outcome. , 2004, Artificial organs.

[26]  L. Aarts,et al.  Mini extracorporeal circuit for coronary artery bypass grafting: initial clinical and biochemical results , 2004, Perfusion.

[27]  R. Habib,et al.  Adverse effects of low hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass in the adult: should current practice be changed? , 2003, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[28]  G. Pelissero,et al.  Hematocrit on cardiopulmonary bypass and outcome after coronary surgery in nontransfused patients. , 2010, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[29]  J. Remadi,et al.  Prospective randomized study comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with the new mini-extracorporeal circulation Jostra System or with a standard cardiopulmonary bypass. , 2006, American heart journal.