On the use of Bayesian decision theory for issuing natural hazard warnings.

Warnings for natural hazards improve societal resilience and are a good example of decision-making under uncertainty. A warning system is only useful if well defined and thus understood by stakeholders. However, most operational warning systems are heuristic: not formally or transparently defined. Bayesian decision theory provides a framework for issuing warnings under uncertainty but has not been fully exploited. Here, a decision theoretic framework is proposed for hazard warnings. The framework allows any number of warning levels and future states of nature, and a mathematical model for constructing the necessary loss functions for both generic and specific end-users is described. The approach is illustrated using one-day ahead warnings of daily severe precipitation over the UK, and compared to the current decision tool used by the UK Met Office. A probability model is proposed to predict precipitation, given ensemble forecast information, and loss functions are constructed for two generic stakeholders: an end-user and a forecaster. Results show that the Met Office tool issues fewer high-level warnings compared with our system for the generic end-user, suggesting the former may not be suitable for risk averse end-users. In addition, raw ensemble forecasts are shown to be unreliable and result in higher losses from warnings.

[1]  P. Jones Making Decisions , 1971, Nature.

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  J. Berger Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[4]  Kenneth R. Mylne Decision‐making from probability forecasts based on forecast value , 2002 .

[5]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  REAL-TIME RISK ANALYSIS FOR HYBRID EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[6]  Lara Cook,et al.  Forecast-Based Decision Support for San Francisco International Airport: A NextGen Prototype System That Improves Operations during Summer Stratus Season , 2012 .

[7]  Christopher A. T. Ferro,et al.  A comparison of ensemble post‐processing methods for extreme events , 2014 .

[8]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[9]  S. Cutter,et al.  Crying wolf: Repeat responses to hurricane evacuation orders , 1998 .

[10]  Luca Delle Monache,et al.  A Weather and Climate Enterprise Strategic Implementation Plan for Generating and Communicating Forecast Uncertainty Information , 2011 .

[11]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  A theory of flood warning systems , 1993 .

[12]  John H. Sorensen,et al.  Hazard Warning Systems: Review of 20 Years of Progress , 2000 .

[13]  Michael Sharpe,et al.  Ensemble based first guess support towards a risk‐based severe weather warning service , 2014 .

[14]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  Forecast value: prototype decision-making models , 1997 .

[15]  R. Clemen,et al.  Soft Computing , 2002 .

[16]  Weather Warnings , 1881, Nature.

[17]  I. Jolliffe,et al.  Forecast verification : a practitioner's guide in atmospheric science , 2011 .

[18]  Mario L. V. Martina,et al.  A Bayesian decision approach to rainfall thresholds based flood warning , 2005 .

[19]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Operational early warning systems for water-related hazards in Europe , 2012 .

[20]  M. Kendall Theoretical Statistics , 1956, Nature.

[21]  Stefan Siegert Forecast Verification Routines for the SPECS FP7 Project , 2015 .

[22]  N. K. Samadhiya,et al.  Review of geohazard warning systems toward development of a popular usage geohazard warning communication system , 2012 .

[23]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Discrete Postprocessing of Total Cloud Cover Ensemble Forecasts , 2016 .

[24]  Farrokh Nadim,et al.  Stochastic design of an early warning system , 2008 .

[25]  Kevin P. Murphy,et al.  Machine learning - a probabilistic perspective , 2012, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[26]  Jim Q. Smith,et al.  Bayesian Decision Analysis: Principles and Practice , 2010 .