Bacterial biofilms in patients with indwelling urinary catheters

Bacteria have a basic survival strategy: to colonize surfaces and grow as biofilm communities embedded in a gel-like polysaccharide matrix. The catheterized urinary tract provides ideal conditions for the development of enormous biofilm populations. Many bacterial species colonize indwelling catheters as biofilms, inducing complications in patients' care. The most troublesome complications are the crystalline biofilms that can occlude the catheter lumen and trigger episodes of pyelonephritis and septicemia. The crystalline biofilms result from infection by urease-producing bacteria, particularly Proteus mirabilis. Urease raises the urinary pH and drives the formation of calcium phosphate and magnesium phosphate crystals in the biofilm. All types of catheter are vulnerable to encrustation by these biofilms, and clinical prevention strategies are clearly needed, as bacteria growing in the biofilm mode are resistant to antibiotics. Evidence indicates that treatment of symptomatic, catheter-associated urinary tract infection is more effective if biofilm-laden catheters are changed before antibiotic treatment is initiated. Infection with P. mirabilis exposes the many faults of currently available catheters, and plenty of scope exists for improvement in both their design and production; manufacturers should take up the challenge to improve patient outcomes.

[1]  A. Norberg,et al.  The spontaneous variation of catheter life in long-stay geriatric inpatients with indwelling catheters. , 1983, Gerontology.

[2]  T. Tsukamoto,et al.  Bacterial colonization on intraluminal surface of urethral catheter. , 2005, Urology.

[3]  B. Jones,et al.  Role of swarming in the formation of crystalline Proteus mirabilis biofilms on urinary catheters. , 2005, Journal of medical microbiology.

[4]  G. Williams,et al.  Some observations on the diffusion of antimicrobial agents through the retention balloons of foley catheters. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[5]  P. Tambyah,et al.  [European and Asian guidelines on management and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections]. , 2008, Urologiia.

[6]  D. Stickler,et al.  Species interactions in mixed-community crystalline biofilms on urinary catheters. , 2007, Journal of medical microbiology.

[7]  R. McLean,et al.  The development of bacterial biofilms on indwelling urethral catheters , 1999, World Journal of Urology.

[8]  I. Nuseibeh,et al.  Urinary catheter blockage depends on urine pH, calcium and rate of flow , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[9]  A. D. Russell,et al.  A strategy for the control of catheter blockage by crystalline Proteus mirabilis biofilm using the antibacterial agent triclosan. , 2005, European urology.

[10]  H. Mobley,et al.  Genetic and biochemical diversity of ureases of Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella species isolated from urinary tract infection , 1987, Infection and immunity.

[11]  J. V. D. van der Meer,et al.  Restriction of long-term indwelling urethral catheterisation in the elderly. , 1986, British journal of urology.

[12]  D. Stickler,et al.  Complications of urinary tract infections associated with devices used for long-term bladder management. , 1994, The Journal of hospital infection.

[13]  H. Hisazumi,et al.  Bacterial and crystal adherence to the surfaces of indwelling urethral catheters. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[14]  D. Stickler,et al.  Which indwelling urethral catheters resist encrustation by Proteus mirabilis biofilms? , 1997, British journal of urology.

[15]  M. Suller,et al.  Genotyping of urinary and fecal Proteus mirabilis isolates from individuals with long-term urinary catheters , 2005, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[16]  J. Costerton,et al.  Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. , 1987, Annual review of microbiology.

[17]  K. Lewis,et al.  Riddle of Biofilm Resistance , 2001, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[18]  D. Stickler,et al.  Modulation of crystalline Proteus mirabilis biofilm development on urinary catheters. , 2006, Journal of medical microbiology.

[19]  W. Anthony,et al.  Cephalexin for susceptible bacteriuria in afebrile, long-term catheterized patients. , 1982, JAMA.

[20]  J. Chawla,et al.  Some observations on urinary tract infections in patients undergoing long-term bladder catheterization. , 1982, The Journal of hospital infection.

[21]  J. Tenney,et al.  Bacteriuria in women with long-term catheters: paired comparison of indwelling and replacement catheters. , 1988, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[22]  W. Stamm Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[23]  I. Eardley,et al.  Biofilms, bacteria and bladder catheters. A clinical study. , 1989, British journal of urology.

[24]  R. Gleckman,et al.  Urinary Tract Infections: Detection, Prevention, and Management By Calvin M. Kunin. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. 432 pp., illustrated. $49 , 1997 .

[25]  D. Stickler,et al.  Why are Foley catheters so vulnerable to encrustation and blockage by crystalline bacterial biofilm? , 2003, Urological Research.

[26]  M. Waters,et al.  A clinical assessment of the performance of a sensor to detect crystalline biofilm formation on indwelling bladder catheters , 2006, BJU international.

[27]  P. Tambyah,et al.  A prospective study of pathogenesis of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. , 1999, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[28]  W. Elias,et al.  Fimbriae of uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis. , 2007, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[29]  A. Mulhall,et al.  The encrustation of indwelling catheters. , 1991, British journal of urology.

[30]  J. Greenman,et al.  Factors modulating the pH at which calcium and magnesium phosphates precipitate from human urine , 2005, Urological Research.

[31]  D. Stickler,et al.  Reduced Susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to Triclosan , 2008, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[32]  S. Morris,et al.  Audit of catheter management provided by District Nurses and Continence Advisors. , 1993, British journal of urology.

[33]  L. Nicolle,et al.  Chronic indwelling catheter replacement before antimicrobial therapy for symptomatic urinary tract infection. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[34]  D. Hukins,et al.  Infection of catheterised patients: bacterial colonisation of encrusted Foley catheters shown by scanning electron microscopy , 2004, Urological Research.

[35]  Vivek Trikha,et al.  Clinical Study , 1961, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[36]  D. Stickler Susceptibility of antibiotic‐resistant Gram‐negative bacteria to biocides: a perspective from the study of catheter biofilms , 2002, Symposium series.

[37]  K. Getliffe The characteristics and management of patients with recurrent blockage of long-term urinary catheters. , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[38]  E. Mahenthiralingam,et al.  Genotyping demonstrates that the strains of Proteus mirabilis from bladder stones and catheter encrustations of patients undergoing long-term bladder catheterization are identical. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[39]  D. Stickler,et al.  Antimicrobial Urinary Catheters , 2007 .

[40]  J. Warren,et al.  The catheter and urinary tract infection. , 1991, The Medical clinics of North America.

[41]  D. Stickler,et al.  Observations on the development of the crystalline bacterial biofilms that encrust and block Foley catheters. , 2008, The Journal of hospital infection.

[42]  H. Mobley,et al.  Urease-positive bacteriuria and obstruction of long-term urinary catheters , 1987, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[43]  W. Feast,et al.  Polymer surface properties and their effect on the adhesion of Proteus mirabilis , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[44]  H. Mobley,et al.  Complicated Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections Due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis , 2008, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[45]  G. Pugliese,et al.  Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms , 2002, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[46]  R. Donlan,et al.  Biofilms: Microbial Life on Surfaces , 2002, Emerging infectious diseases.

[47]  Frcs Consultant Urologist. R.C.L. Feneley MChir Long-term catheterization of the bladder: , 1996 .

[48]  H. Hedelin,et al.  The composition of catheter encrustations, including the effects of allopurinol treatment. , 1984, British journal of urology.

[49]  D. Hukins,et al.  Morphology of mineral deposits on encrusted urinary catheters investigated by scanning electron microscopy. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[50]  J. Nickel,et al.  Biofilm Mediated Calculus Formation in the Urinary Tract , 1996 .

[51]  D. Hukins,et al.  Feasability of Preventing Encrustation of Urinary Catheters , 1995 .

[52]  M. Suller,et al.  Prospective study of individuals with long‐term urinary catheters colonized with Proteus species , 2006, BJU international.

[53]  D. Stickler,et al.  Studies on the formation of crystalline bacterial biofilms on urethral catheters , 1998, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[54]  S. Saint,et al.  Biofilms and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. , 2003, Infectious disease clinics of North America.

[55]  S. Beatson,et al.  Identification of Type 3 Fimbriae in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Reveals a Role in Biofilm Formation , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[56]  A. J. Cox Comparison of catheter surface morphologies. , 1990, British journal of urology.

[57]  B. Trautner,et al.  Role of biofilm in catheter-associated urinary tract infection. , 2004, American journal of infection control.

[58]  J. Flament,et al.  [In vivo and in vitro analysis of the ability of urinary catheter to microbial colonization]. , 1996, Pathologie-biologie.

[59]  B. Liedl,et al.  Catheter-associated urinary tract infections , 2001, Current opinion in urology.

[60]  R C Feneley,et al.  Long-term catheterization of the bladder: prevalence and morbidity. , 1996, British journal of urology.

[61]  C. Winters,et al.  Proteus mirabilis biofilms and the encrustation of urethral catheters , 2004, Urological Research.

[62]  Michael J. Long,et al.  An electrified catheter to resist encrustation by Proteus mirabilis biofilm. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[63]  Adrian Russell,et al.  Control of encrustation and blockage of Foley catheters , 2003, The Lancet.

[64]  C. Fry,et al.  Catheter associated urinary tract infection and encrustation. , 2001, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[65]  W. Feast,et al.  Observations on the adherence of Proteus mirabilis onto polymer surfaces , 2006, Journal of applied microbiology.

[66]  M. Suller,et al.  Factors affecting crystal precipitation from urine in individuals with long-term urinary catheters colonized with urease-positive bacterial species , 2006, Urological Research.

[67]  J. Wimpenny,et al.  Scanning electron microscopy of bacterial biofilms on indwelling bladder catheters , 1992, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[68]  C. Kunin Blockage of urinary catheters: role of microorganisms and constituents of the urine on formation of encrustations. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[69]  C. Kunin Can we build a better urinary catheter? , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[70]  D. Stickler,et al.  Effect of Triclosan on the Development of Bacterial Biofilms by Urinary Tract Pathogens on Urinary Catheters , 2022 .

[71]  E. Mahenthiralingam,et al.  Molecular Epidemiology of Proteus mirabilis Infections of the Catheterized Urinary Tract , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.