Long‐term ecosystem level experiments at Toolik Lake, Alaska, and at Abisko, Northern Sweden: generalizations and differences in ecosystem and plant type responses to global change

Long-term ecosystem-level experiments, in which the environment is manipulated in a controlled manner, are important tools to predict the responses of ecosystem functioning and composition to future global change. We present the results of a meta-analysis performed on the results of long-term ecosystem-level experiments near Toolik Lake, Alaska, and Abisko, Sweden. We quantified aboveground biomass responses of different arctic and subarctic ecosystems to experimental fertilization, warming and shading. We not only analysed the general patterns but also the differences in responsiveness between sites and regions. Aboveground plant biomass showed a broad similarity of responses in both locations, and also showed some important differences. In both locations, aboveground plant biomass, particularly the biomass of deciduous and graminoid plants, responded most strongly to nutrient addition. The biomass of mosses and lichens decreased in both locations as the biomass of vascular plants increased. An important difference between the two regions was the smaller positive aboveground biomass response of deciduous shrubs in Abisko as compared with Toolik Lake. Whereas in Toolik Lake Betula nana increased its dominance and replaced many of the other plant types, in Abisko all vascular plant types increased in abundance without major shifts in relative abundance. The differences between the responses of the dominant vegetation types of the Toolik Lake region, i.e. tussock tundra systems, and that of the Abisko region, i.e. heath systems, may have important implications for ecosystem development under expected patterns of global change. However, there were also large site-specific differences within each region. Several potential mechanistic explanations for the differences between sites and regions are discussed. The response patterns show the need for analyses of joint data sets from many regions and sites, in order to uncover common responses to changes in climate across large arctic regions from regional or local responses.

[1]  K. Nadelhoffer,et al.  Changes in Live Plant Biomass, Primary Production, and Species Composition along a Riverside Toposequence in Arctic Alaska, U.S.A. , 1996 .

[2]  A. Michelsen,et al.  Shoot biomass, δ13C, nitrogen and chlorophyll responses of two arctic dwarf shrubs to in situ shading, nutrient application and warming simulating climatic change , 2004, Oecologia.

[3]  C. Gehrke.  IMPACTS OF ENHANCED ULTRAVIOLET‐B RADIATION ON MOSSES IN A SUBARCTIC HEATH ECOSYSTEM , 1999 .

[4]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Growth responses of Polytrichum commune and Hylocomium splendens to simulated environmental change in the sub-arctic. , 1995, The New phytologist.

[5]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[6]  Robert D. Hollister,et al.  RESPONSES OF TUNDRA PLANTS TO EXPERIMENTAL WARMING:META‐ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNATIONAL TUNDRA EXPERIMENT , 1999 .

[7]  Konrad A Hughen,et al.  Arctic Environmental Change of the Last Four Centuries , 1997 .

[8]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Species composition interacts with fertilizer to control long-term change in tundra productivity , 2001 .

[9]  F. Chapin,et al.  Production: Biomass Relationships and Element Cycling in Contrasting Arctic Vegetation Types , 1991 .

[10]  David W. Kicklighter,et al.  Modelling carbon responses of tundra ecosystems to historical and projected climate: sensitivity of pan‐Arctic carbon storage to temporal and spatial variation in climate , 2000, Global change biology.

[11]  M. Sonesson,et al.  Recent tree-line dynamics (Betula pubescens Ehrh. ssp. tortuosa (Ledeb. ) Nyman in northern Sweden. , 1983 .

[12]  David T. Tissue,et al.  Response of Eriophorum Vaginatum to Elevated CO_2 and Temperature in the Alaskan Tussock Tundra , 1987 .

[13]  T. Callaghan,et al.  PLANT COMMUNITY RESPONSES TO SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE AT A HIGH ARCTIC POLAR SEMI-DESERT , 1998 .

[14]  C. Dormann,et al.  Climate change in the Arctic: using plant functional types in a meta‐analysis of field experiments , 2002 .

[15]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Growth responses of Calamagrostis lapponica to simulated environmental change in the sub-arctic , 1995 .

[16]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  THE RESPONSE OF TUNDRA PLANT BIOMASS, ABOVEGROUND PRODUCTION, NITROGEN, AND CO2 FLUX TO EXPERIMENTAL WARMING , 1998 .

[17]  F. Chapin,et al.  Physiological and Growth Responses of Arctic Plants to a Field Experiment Simulating Climatic Change , 1996 .

[18]  F. Berendse.  Competition between plant populations at low and high nutrient supplies. , 1994 .

[19]  A. McGuire,et al.  Land Cover Change on the Seward Peninsula: The Use of Remote Sensing to Evaluate the Potential Influences of Climate Warming on Historical Vegetation Dynamics , 2001 .

[20]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META‐ANALYSES , 1999 .

[21]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[22]  EFFECTS OF ENHANCED UV-B RADIATION AND ELEVATED CARBON DIOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS ON A SUB-ARCTIC FOREST HEATH ECOSYSTEM , 1997 .

[23]  D. Yamaguchi,et al.  The Oldest Known Rocky Mountain Bristlecone Pines (Pinus aristata Engelm.) , 1992, Arctic and Alpine Research.

[24]  S. Hobbie,et al.  Luxury consumption of soil nutrients: a possible competitive strategy in above‐ground and below‐ground biomass allocation and root morphology for slow‐growing arctic vegetation? , 2003 .

[25]  G. Shaver.  Integrated Ecosystem Research in Northern Alaska, 1947–1994 , 1996 .

[26]  G. Shaver,et al.  Response of Arctic ecosystems to climate change: results of long-term field experiments in Sweden and Alaska , 1999 .

[27]  Terry V. Callaghan,et al.  Global change and arctic ecosystems: is lichen decline a function of increases in vascular plant biomass? , 2001 .

[28]  G. Likens,et al.  Long-Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives , 1990 .

[29]  A. Hershey,et al.  Long-Term Measurements at the Arctic LTER Site , 1995 .

[30]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Primary and secondary stem growth in arctic shrubs: implications for community response to environmental change , 2002 .

[31]  W. Oechel,et al.  Observational Evidence of Recent Change in the Northern High-Latitude Environment , 2000 .

[32]  S. Jonasson.  Organic matter and phytomass on three north Swedish tundra sites, and some connections with adjacent tundra areas. , 1982 .

[33]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants , 1980 .

[34]  L. Gough,et al.  Vascular plant species richness in Alaskan arctic tundra: the importance of soil pH , 2000 .

[35]  C. Anderson,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability in the responses of Arctic terrestrial ecosystems to environmental change , 1999 .

[36]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Responses of Arctic Tundra to Experimental and Observed Changes in Climate , 1995 .

[37]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited: A Re-evaluation of Processes and Patterns , 1999 .

[38]  G. R. Shaver,et al.  Dry Heath Arctic Tundra Responses to Long-term Nutrient and Light Manipulation , 2002 .

[39]  S. Jonasson.  Plant responses to fertilization and species removal in tundra related to community structure and clonality. , 1992 .

[40]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Environmental constraints on the growth, photosynthesis and reproductive development of Dryas octopetala at a high Arctic polar semi-desert, Svalbard , 1995, Oecologia.

[41]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Differential growth, allocation and photosynthetic responses of Polygonum viviparum to simulated environmental change at a high arctic polar semi-desert , 1994 .

[42]  A. Michelsen,et al.  Environmental control and intersite variations of phenolics in Betula nana in tundra ecosystems. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[43]  D. Moorhead,et al.  Elevated CO2 alters belowground exoenzyme activities in tussock tundra , 1997, Plant and Soil.

[44]  S. Oberbauer,et al.  Effects of extended growing season and soil warming on carbon dioxide and methane exchange of tussock tundra in Alaska , 1998 .

[45]  P. Rowntree.  Global and Regional Patterns of Climate Change: Recent Predictions for the Arctic , 1997 .

[46]  R. Moss,et al.  The regional impacts of climate change : an assessment of vulnerability , 1997 .

[47]  Steven F. Oberbauer,et al.  10 – The Ecosystem Role of Poikilohydric Tundra Plants , 1992 .

[48]  A. Michelsen,et al.  Effects of environmental perturbations on abundance of subarctic plants after three, seven and ten years of treatments , 2001 .

[49]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types , 1996 .

[50]  U. Molau,et al.  Controls on seed production and seed germinability inEriophorum vaginatum , 1997 .

[51]  S. Running,et al.  Simulating the effects of climate change on the carbon balance of North American high‐latitude forests , 2000, Global change biology.

[52]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Arctic microorganisms respond more to elevated UV-B radiation than CO2 , 2002, Nature.

[53]  E. Rastetter,et al.  BIOMASS AND CO2 FLUX IN WET SEDGE TUNDRAS: RESPONSES TO NUTRIENTS, TEMPERATURE, AND LIGHT , 1998 .

[54]  A. Michelsen,et al.  Effects of shading, nutrient application and warming on leaf growth and shoot densities of dwarf shrubs in two arctic-alpine plant communities , 1997 .

[55]  J. Johnstone,et al.  DEVELOPMENTAL PLASTICITY ALLOWS BETULA NANA TO DOMINATE TUNDRA SUBJECTED TO AN ALTERED ENVIRONMENT , 2001 .

[56]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Arctic terrestrial ecosystems and environmental change , 1995, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[57]  Petr Šmilauer,et al.  CANOCO 4.5 Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination , 2002 .

[58]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Meta-analysis in ecology , 2001 .

[59]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types , 1996 .

[60]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  THE META‐ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE RATIOS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY , 1999 .

[61]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Responses of a subarctic dwarf shrub heath community to simulated environmental change , 1998 .

[62]  H. Cattle,et al.  Modelling Arctic climate change , 1995, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[63]  A. Michelsen,et al.  RESPONSES IN MICROBES AND PLANTS TO CHANGED TEMPERATURE, NUTRIENT, AND LIGHT REGIMES IN THE ARCTIC , 1999 .

[64]  M. V. van Wijk,et al.  Interannual variability of plant phenology in tussock tundra: modelling interactions of plant productivity, plant phenology, snowmelt and soil thaw , 2003 .

[65]  J. Magnuson.  Long-Term Ecological Research and the Invisible Present , 1990 .

[66]  M. Sturm,et al.  Climate change: Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic , 2001, Nature.

[67]  U. Molau.  Responses to natural climatic variation and experimental warming in two tundra plant species with contrasting life forms: Cassiope tetragona and Ranunculus nivalis , 1997 .

[68]  S. Oberbauer,et al.  Predicting vegetative bud break in two arctic deciduous shrub species, Salix pulchra and Betula nana , 2000, Oecologia.

[69]  S. Richardson,et al.  How do nutrients and warming impact on plant communities and their insect herbivores? A 9‐year study from a sub‐Arctic heath , 2002 .

[70]  R. Aerts.  The advantages of being evergreen. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[71]  J. G. Dennis,et al.  Shoot and rhizome-root standing crops of tundra vegetation at Barrow, Alaska. , 1970 .

[72]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[73]  T. Callaghan,et al.  COMPARATIVE RESPONSES OF PHENOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT TO SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE IN SUB-ARCTIC AND HIGH ARCTIC PLANTS , 1993 .

[74]  S. Hobbie,et al.  Responses of moist non-acidic arctic tundra to altered environment: productivity, biomass, and species richness , 2003 .

[75]  C. Tucker,et al.  Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991 , 1997, Nature.