The safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution.

PURPOSE To compare the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution (Trav/Tim) to its components travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution, TRAVATAN, (Trav) and timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution (Tim) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. DESIGN Randomized multicenter, double-masked, active-controlled, parallel group study. METHODS Two hundred sixty-three patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomized to receive Trav/Tim once daily AM (and vehicle PM), Trav once daily PM (and vehicle AM), or Tim twice daily (AM and PM). Efficacy and safety were compared across treatment groups over 3 months. RESULTS Trav/Tim produced a mean IOP decrease from baseline of 1.9 mm Hg to 3.3 mm Hg more than Tim, with a significant decrease in mean IOP at each of the nine study visits (P < or = .003). Trav/Tim decreased mean IOP by 0.9 mm Hg to 2.4 mm Hg more than Trav, with a significant decrease in mean IOP at seven of the nine study visits (P < or = .05). The adverse event profile for Trav/Tim was comparable to Trav or Tim alone. CONCLUSIONS Over the 3 months of treatment, Trav/Tim produced clinically relevant IOP reductions in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension that were greater than those produced by either Trav or Tim alone. The clinical results that Trav/Tim was safe and well tolerated with an incidence of adverse events was comparable to the results of Trav or Tim alone. Trav/Tim provides both more effective IOP reduction than its components and the benefits of once-daily dosing.

[1]  E. E. Hartmann,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  E. Snyder,et al.  The efficacy and safety of the dorzolamide-timolol combination versus the concomitant administration of its components. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[4]  R. Weinreb,et al.  Emerging perspectives in glaucoma: optimizing 24-hour control of intraocular pressure. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  R. Leblanc,et al.  Timolol. Canadian multicenter study. , 1981, Ophthalmology.

[6]  M. Kass The ocular hypertension treatment study. , 1994, Journal of glaucoma.

[7]  T. Zimmerman,et al.  Timolol: A β-Adrenergic Blocking Agent for the Treatment of Glaucoma , 1977 .

[8]  M. B. Shields,et al.  A comparison of dorzolamide-timolol combination versus the concomitant drugs. , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  P. Netland,et al.  Travoprost compared with latanoprost and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  J. Crider,et al.  Human ciliary muscle cell responses to FP-class prostaglandin analogs: phosphoinositide hydrolysis, intracellular Ca2+ mobilization and MAP kinase activation. , 2003, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[11]  D. Kripke,et al.  Twenty-four-hour pattern of intraocular pressure in the aging population. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  R. Brubaker,et al.  The mechanism of betaxolol, a new ocular hypotensive agent. , 1983, Ophthalmology.

[13]  B. Prum,et al.  The advanced glaucoma intervention study (AGIS): 7. the relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration , 2000 .

[14]  S. Asrani,et al.  Large Diurnal Fluctuations in Intraocular Pressure Are an Independent Risk Factor in Patients With Glaucoma , 2000, Journal of glaucoma.

[15]  W. C. Stewart,et al.  Beta-blocker-induced complications and the patient with glaucoma. Newer treatments to help reduce systemic adverse events. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression , 2003 .

[17]  R. P. Mills,et al.  Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[18]  E. Sullivan,et al.  Comparison of travoprost 0.0015% and 0.004% with timolol 0.5% in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 6-month, masked, multicenter trial. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[19]  J. Pichert,et al.  Compliance Barriers in Glaucoma: A Systematic Classification , 2003, Journal of glaucoma.

[20]  R. Greenberg Overview of patient compliance with medication dosing: a literature review. , 1984, Clinical therapeutics.

[21]  R. Weinreb Compliance with Medical Treatment of Glaucoma , 1992 .

[22]  G. Spaeth,et al.  Compliance in patients prescribed eyedrops for glaucoma. , 1995, Ophthalmic surgery.

[23]  T. Zimmerman,et al.  Timolol. A beta-adrenergic blocking agent for the treatment of glaucoma. , 1977, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  J. Crider,et al.  Human trabecular meshwork cell responses induced by bimatoprost, travoprost, unoprostone, and other FP prostaglandin receptor agonist analogues. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  R. Brubaker,et al.  Effects of AGN 192024, a new ocular hypotensive agent, on aqueous dynamics. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  C. Camras Mechanism of the prostaglandin-induced reduction of intraocular pressure in humans. , 1995, Advances in prostaglandin, thromboxane, and leukotriene research.

[27]  C. Camras Travoprost compared with latanoprost and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.