Geographical clustering and the evaluation of cluster policies: introduction

The article introduces the special section on “Geographical Clustering and the Evaluation of Cluster Policies”. We first provide a motivation of cluster policies and briefly review the state of the art in cluster evaluation research. We proceed with summaries of the papers comprising the special section, which take different perspectives and cover distinct facets of cluster policy evaluation. The papers identify challenges for evaluation by highlighting the variety of approaches towards cluster policies addressed at different policy levels. Additional challenges for an identification of policy impact result from the complexity as well as the timing of policy effects. Thus, proper evaluations should employ and combine a broad set of evaluation methods. Based on the main lessons learned, we finally propose several avenues for future research to cope with these challenges.

[1]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  Structural dynamics of innovation networks in German Leading-Edge Clusters , 2019 .

[2]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  Cluster ambidexterity towards exploration and exploitation: strategies and cluster management , 2019 .

[3]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact , 2016 .

[4]  Elena Zukauskaite,et al.  Institutional Conditions and Innovation Systems: On the Impact of Regional Policy on Firms in Different Sectors , 2014 .

[5]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to national systems of innovation , 2010 .

[6]  Joan Crespo,et al.  Network Structural Properties for Cluster Long Run Dynamics. Evidence from Collaborative R&D Networks in the European Mobile Phone Industry , 2016 .

[7]  Steven Brakman,et al.  Reflections on Cluster Policies , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  Verena Eckl,et al.  R&D funding and private R&D: empirical evidence on the impact of the leading-edge cluster competition , 2019 .

[9]  Thomas Brenner,et al.  Policy Measures and their Effects in the Different Phases of the Cluster Life Cycle , 2011 .

[10]  Jochen Dehio,et al.  Analysing the effects of cluster policy: What can we learn from the German leading-edge cluster competition? , 2017 .

[11]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Die Evolution der bundesdeutschen Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik: Rückblick und Bestandsaufnahme , 2002 .

[12]  V. Gilsing,et al.  A system failure framework for innovation policy design , 2005 .

[13]  A. Saxenian The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley , 1991 .

[14]  Dirk Crass,et al.  Geographical clustering and the effectiveness of public innovation programs , 2016 .

[15]  J. Nishimura,et al.  Subsidy and networking: The effects of direct and indirect support programs of the cluster policy , 2011 .

[16]  Matthias Kiese,et al.  Regional cluster policies in Germany: challenges, impacts and evaluation practices , 2019 .

[17]  Ronnie Ramlogan,et al.  The impact of cluster policy on innovation , 2016 .

[18]  M. Porter Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy , 2000 .

[19]  R. Martin,et al.  Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? , 2003 .

[20]  C. Freeman Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[21]  Junichi Nishimura,et al.  R&D productivity and the organization of cluster policy: an empirical evaluation of the Industrial Cluster Project in Japan , 2011 .

[22]  Gilles Duranton,et al.  California Dreamin’: The Feeble Case for Cluster Policies , 2011, Review of Economic Analysis.

[23]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[24]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  The role of geographical proximity for project performance: evidence from the German Leading-Edge Cluster Competition , 2015, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[25]  Philippe Martin,et al.  Public Support to Clusters: A Firm Level Study of French 'Local Productive Systems' , 2008 .