Using assessment to support higher level learning: the multiple choice item development assignment

This paper describes the multiple choice item development assignment (MCIDA) that was developed to support both content and higher level learning. The MCIDA involves students in higher level learning by requiring them to develop multiple choice items, write justifications for both correct and incorrect answer options and determine the highest cognitive level that the item is testing. The article discusses the benefits and limitations of the scheme and presents data on the largely positive student reactions to the scheme. The development of the MCIDA also serves as an example for how traditional summatively oriented assessment procedures can be developed into tools that directly support student learning.

[1]  J. Balla,et al.  Assessment of Student Performance: a framework for improving practice , 1994 .

[2]  L. Dee Fink,et al.  Pre-Instructional Minitests: An Efficient Solution to the Problem of Covering Content , 1994 .

[3]  John R. Schermerhorn,et al.  Success Profiles for Student Examination Performance in a Large-Lecture Management Course: An Empirical Study , 1992 .

[4]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Students' experiences in studying for multiple choice question examinations , 1994 .

[5]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[6]  Tammy Bunn Hiller,et al.  Contract Grading: Encouraging Commitment to the Learning Process through Voice in the Evaluation Process , 2001 .

[7]  Diana Bilimoria Modernism, Postmodernism, and Contemporary Grading Practices , 1995 .

[8]  David R. Hampton Textbook Test File Multiple-Choice Questions can Measure (A) Knowledge, (B) Intellectual Ability, (C) Neither, (D) Both , 1993 .

[9]  K. Topping Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities , 1998 .

[10]  Robert Glaser,et al.  Instructional technology and the measurement of learing outcomes: Some questions. , 1963 .

[11]  Kevin Cox,et al.  Student Assessment in Higher Education: A Handbook for Assessing Performance , 1998 .

[12]  Peter D. Couch,et al.  Beyond Self-Directed Learning: A Partnership Model of Teaching and Learning , 1994 .

[13]  R. L. Ebel,et al.  Essentials of educational measurement , 1972 .

[14]  Jane V. Wheeler,et al.  Learning-Centered Education , 1995 .

[15]  Richard W. Morshead Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook II: Affective Domain , 1965 .

[16]  Robert Glaser Instructional Technology and the Measwement of Learning Outcomes: Some Questions1 , 2005 .

[17]  Equal Opportunity in the Classroom: Test Construction in a Diversity-Sensitive Environment , 1998 .