Liquid-based gating mechanism with tunable multiphase selectivity and antifouling behaviour

Living organisms make extensive use of micro- and nanometre-sized pores as gatekeepers for controlling the movement of fluids, vapours and solids between complex environments. The ability of such pores to coordinate multiphase transport, in a highly selective and subtly triggered fashion and without clogging, has inspired interest in synthetic gated pores for applications ranging from fluid processing to 3D printing and lab-on-chip systems. But although specific gating and transport behaviours have been realized by precisely tailoring pore surface chemistries and pore geometries, a single system capable of controlling complex, selective multiphase transport has remained a distant prospect, and fouling is nearly inevitable. Here we introduce a gating mechanism that uses a capillary-stabilized liquid as a reversible, reconfigurable gate that fills and seals pores in the closed state, and creates a non-fouling, liquid-lined pore in the open state. Theoretical modelling and experiments demonstrate that for each transport substance, the gating threshold—the pressure needed to open the pores—can be rationally tuned over a wide pressure range. This enables us to realize in one system differential response profiles for a variety of liquids and gases, even letting liquids flow through the pore while preventing gas from escaping. These capabilities allow us to dynamically modulate gas–liquid sorting in a microfluidic flow and to separate a three-phase air–water–oil mixture, with the liquid lining ensuring sustained antifouling behaviour. Because the liquid gating strategy enables efficient long-term operation and can be applied to a variety of pore structures and membrane materials, and to micro- as well as macroscale fluid systems, we expect it to prove useful in a wide range of applications.

[1]  I. Grigorieva,et al.  Unimpeded Permeation of Water Through Helium-Leak–Tight Graphene-Based Membranes , 2011, Science.

[2]  Herman Goossens,et al.  Active liquid degassing in microfluidic systems. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[3]  Characterization of polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membranes , 1997 .

[4]  H. Butt,et al.  Super liquid-repellent gas membranes for carbon dioxide capture and heart–lung machines , 2013, Nature Communications.

[5]  Sheereen Majd,et al.  Controlling protein translocation through nanopores with bio-inspired fluid walls , 2011 .

[6]  Haim H Bau,et al.  A membrane-based, high-efficiency, microfluidic debubbler. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[7]  Izumi Ichinose,et al.  Ultrafast permeation of water through protein-based membranes. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[8]  Alan Faulkner-Jones,et al.  Development of a valve-based cell printer for the formation of human embryonic stem cell spheroid aggregates , 2013, Biofabrication.

[9]  Roderick Y. H. Lim,et al.  Converging on the function of intrinsically disordered nucleoporins in the nuclear pore complex , 2010, Biological chemistry.

[10]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Polymer surface nano-structuring of reverse osmosis membranes for fouling resistance and improved flux performance , 2010 .

[11]  Chong H. Ahn,et al.  Institute of Physics Publishing Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering a Review of Microvalves , 2022 .

[12]  Bin Su,et al.  DNA-based intelligent logic controlled release systems. , 2012, Chemical communications.

[13]  Sindy K. Y. Tang,et al.  Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity , 2011, Nature.

[14]  N Lotan,et al.  Large porous particles for pulmonary drug delivery. , 1997, Science.

[15]  Z. Siwy,et al.  Electric-field-induced wetting and dewetting in single hydrophobic nanopores. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[16]  W. Künnecke,et al.  Flow analysis with membrane separation and time based sampling for ethanol determination in beer and wine , 1995 .

[17]  M. Ulbricht Advanced functional polymer membranes , 2006 .

[18]  Reinhard Neumann,et al.  Ionic transport through single solid-state nanopores controlled with thermally nanoactuated macromolecular gates. , 2009, Small.

[19]  W. R. Purcell,et al.  Capillary Pressures - Their Measurement Using Mercury and the Calculation of Permeability Therefrom , 1949 .

[20]  Vinay Pagay,et al.  The Physicochemical Hydrodynamics of Vascular Plants , 2014 .

[21]  Zhi‐Kang Xu,et al.  Mineral-Coated Polymer Membranes with Superhydrophilicity and Underwater Superoleophobicity for Effective Oil/Water Separation , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[22]  M. Mietton-peuchot,et al.  Use of gas-liquid porometry measurements for selection of microfiltration membranes , 1997 .

[23]  K. Jensen,et al.  Integrated continuous microfluidic liquid-liquid extraction. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[24]  Maria Forsyth,et al.  High Rates of Oxygen Reduction over a Vapor Phase–Polymerized PEDOT Electrode , 2008, Science.

[25]  Geoffrey McLennan,et al.  Alveolar dynamics during respiration: are the pores of Kohn a pathway to recruitment? , 2008, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.

[26]  M. Biot General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation , 1941 .

[27]  Nadia Adrus,et al.  Novel hydrogel pore-filled composite membranes with tunable and temperature-responsive size selectivity , 2012 .

[28]  Jay W. Grate,et al.  Influence of Viscous and Capillary Forces on Immiscible Fluid Displacement: Pore-Scale Experimental Study in a Water-Wet Micromodel Demonstrating Viscous and Capillary Fingering , 2011 .