The effects of a major flood on an endangered freshwater mussel population

During February 1998, a 100-year return flood occurred in the River Kerry, north-western Scotland. A study was undertaken in order to assess the impact of this event on a large, internationally important freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) population. A conservative estimate of 50,000 mussels killed by the flood was made. This represents 4–8% of the total population. Significant channel reformation and large-scale movements of substrata occurred in some reaches, whereas others appeared to be unchanged. Some mussel beds disappeared or were largely depleted whereas others remained intact. Boulder-dominated substrata appear to have provided the most protection from scouring. The relatively high mussel densities and recruitment levels found in the middle reaches are probably due to the fact that this part of the river is hydrologically stable. It is likely that the intact mussel beds in the middle reaches will be the main source of regeneration in other parts of the river as the population recovers. As a result of recent changes in the hydrological behaviour of Scottish rivers, several M. margaritifera populations may now be more at risk from these catastrophic events. Therefore, it is important that conservation managers are aware of this potential threat.

[1]  P. Cosgrove,et al.  Sizes, densities and age structures of Scottish Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) populations , 2000 .

[2]  M. E. Gordon,et al.  Mussels: The forgotten fauna of regulated rivers. A case study of the Caney Fork River , 1993 .

[3]  L. Corkum,et al.  Relationship between the spatial distribution of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) and the hydrological variability of rivers , 1995 .

[4]  G. Bauer Age structure, age specific mortality rates and population trend of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) in North Bavaria , 1983 .

[5]  C. Wentworth A Scale of Grade and Class Terms for Clastic Sediments , 1922, The Journal of Geology.

[6]  D. Strayer,et al.  The Fresh water Mussels (Bivalvia, Unionoidea) of the Upper Delaware River Drainage , 1991 .

[7]  G. Minshall,et al.  Fluvial processes and local lithology controlling abundance, structure, and composition of mussel beds. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D. Strayer,et al.  Microhabitat Use by an Assemblage of Stream-Dwelling Unionaceans (Bivalvia), including Two Rare Species of Alasmidonta , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[9]  P. Cosgrove,et al.  The Extent of, and Causes for, the Decline of a Highly Threatened Naiad: Margaritifera margaritifera , 2001 .

[10]  R. A. Phillips ON MARGARITIFERA DURROVENSIS, A NEW SPECIES OF PEARL MUSSEL FROM IRELAND , 1928 .

[11]  M. Young,et al.  The status and conservation of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera Linn. in Great Britain , 1983 .

[12]  P. J. Boon,et al.  Growth characteristics of freshwater pearl mussels, Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) , 2000 .

[13]  A. Black Major flooding and increased flood frequency in Scotland since 1988 , 1995 .

[14]  Pw Kat,et al.  Effects of population density and substratum type on growth and migration of Elliptio complanata (Bivalvia : Unionidae) , 1982 .

[15]  The Molluscan Fauna of the Elk River in Tennessee and Alabama Usa , 1984 .

[16]  A. E. Boycott The Habitats of Fresh-Water Mollusca in Britain , 1936 .

[17]  K. Wächtler,et al.  Studies on the chemistry of interstitial water taken from defined horizons in the fine sediments of bivalve habitats in several northern German lowland waters. II: Microhabitats of Margaritifera margaritifera L., Unio crassus (Philipsson) and Unio tumidus Philipsson , 1993 .

[18]  James B. Layzer,et al.  Microhabitat use by freshwater mussels and recommendations for determining their instream flow needs , 1995 .

[19]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists , 1997 .