Choose Quickly! The Influence of Cognitive Resource Availability on the Preference between the Intuitive and Externally Recommended Options

Abstract The issue addressed by this research is when does a decision-maker select his or her intuitive, default, option and when the option suggested by someone else? We introduce the idea that cognitive resource availability is a key to this question. When there are limited cognitive resources available either due to knowledge deficiencies or, perhaps, time pressure then the default option is more likely to be selected. When there is plenty of cognitive resource available, then it is more likely that a decision favoring a recommended option is made. We support this hypothesis with three experiments; within the context of buying a digital camera, in the Ultimatum Game, and in a decoy choice situation. The findings have significance in that they support and explicate current theory, and also to practice in that there are public services, as well as competitive business situations, when a particular choice outcome is socially beneficial.

[1]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Intuitive confidence: choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Steven M. Shugan.  The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[3]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-Regulation Failure: An Overview , 1996 .

[4]  Jungkeun Kim,et al.  The influence of hedonic versus utilitarian consumption situations on the compromise effect , 2016 .

[5]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  Affective Intuition and Task-Contingent Affect Regulation , 2004 .

[6]  Ilan Yaniv,et al.  Receiving Other People's Advice: Influence and Benefit , 2004 .

[7]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Time Pressure on Consumer Choice Deferral , 1999 .

[8]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Impact of Anticipating Satisfaction on Consumer Choice , 2000 .

[9]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice , 1990 .

[10]  Jen-Hung Huang,et al.  Herding in online product choice , 2006 .

[11]  Jongwon Park,et al.  The Effects of Decoys on Preference Shifts: The Role of Attractiveness and Providing Justification , 2005, Journal of Consumer Psychology.

[12]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  Take The First: Option-generation and resulting choices , 2003 .

[13]  Christian S. Crandall,et al.  The Psychological Advantage of the Status Quo , 2007 .

[14]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Choice Set Configuration as a Determinant of Preference Attribution and Strength , 2008 .

[15]  Paul Tompkinson,et al.  The ultimatum game: raising the stakes , 1995 .

[16]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Social defaults : Observed choices become choice defaults , 2014 .

[17]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  Defaults, Framing and Privacy: Why Opting In-Opting Out1 , 2002 .

[19]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[20]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Toward Extending the Compromise Effect to Complex Buying Contexts , 2004 .

[21]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The Construction of Preference: Do Defaults Save Lives? , 2006 .

[22]  J. Baron,et al.  Status-quo and omission biases , 1992 .

[23]  Girish N. Punj,et al.  A Typology of Individual Search Strategies Among Purchasers of New Automobiles , 1984 .

[24]  Peter Beomcheol Kim,et al.  The Influence of Decision Task on the Magnitude of Decoy and Compromise Effects in a Travel Decision , 2018, Journal of Travel Research.

[25]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[26]  Jungkeun Kim.  The influence of graphical versus numerical information representation modes on the compromise effect , 2017 .

[27]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[28]  Paul Tompkinson,et al.  The ultimatum game and non-selfish utility functions , 1996 .

[29]  Piyush Sharma,et al.  Deliberate Self-Indulgence versus Involuntary Loss of Self-Control: Toward a Robust Cross-Cultural Consumer Impulsiveness Scale , 2011 .

[30]  S. Epstein,et al.  Conflict Between Intuitive and Rational Processing: When People Behave Against Their Better Judgment , 1994 .

[31]  D. Moore,et al.  Effects of Task Difficulty on Use of Advice , 2007 .

[32]  R. Dhar,et al.  A dual-system framework to understand preference construction processes in choice☆ , 2013 .

[33]  N. Epley,et al.  The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic , 2006, Psychological science.

[34]  On Amir,et al.  Choice Construction versus Preference Construction: The Instability of Preferences Learned in Context , 2007 .

[35]  H. Oppewal,et al.  The attraction effect is more pronounced for consumers who rely on intuitive reasoning , 2012 .

[36]  Stacey R. Finkelstein,et al.  Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults , 2006, Psychological science.

[37]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions , 1993 .

[38]  Jongwon Park,et al.  Decoy Effects and Brands , 2006 .

[39]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[40]  A Multi-Attribute Examination of Consumer Conformity in Group-Level Ordering * , 2017 .

[41]  Ronald J. Faber,et al.  Spent Resources: Self‐Regulatory Resource Availability Affects Impulse Buying , 2007 .

[42]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[43]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Reactance to Recommendations: When Unsolicited Advice Yields Contrary Responses , 2004 .

[44]  Kent B. Monroe,et al.  The Effects of Time Constraints on Consumers' Judgments of Prices and Products , 2003 .

[45]  S. Sénécal,et al.  The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices , 2004 .

[46]  Mark T. Spence,et al.  Mediation Analysis Revisited: Practical Suggestions for Addressing Common Deficiencies , 2018 .

[47]  Aradhna Krishna,et al.  The Skeptical Shopper: A Metacognitive Account for the Effects of Default Options on Choice , 2004 .

[48]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[49]  Alexander Chernev,et al.  Goal Orientation and Consumer Preference for the Status Quo , 2004 .

[50]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .

[51]  Jongwon Park,et al.  Effects of cognitive resource availability on consumer decisions involving counterfeit products: The role of perceived justification , 2012 .

[52]  D. Ariely,et al.  In Search of Homo Economicus: Cognitive Noise and the Role of Emotion in Preference Consistency , 2009 .

[53]  Richard N. Cardozo.  An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction , 1965 .

[54]  Joseph W. Alba,et al.  The Role of Consumers' Intuitions in Inference Making , 1994 .

[55]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[56]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Effects of Social and Temporal Distance on Consumers' Responses to Peer Recommendations , 2010 .

[57]  R. Dhar,et al.  Deciding without Resources: Resource Depletion and Choice in Context , 2009 .

[58]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice: , 1999 .

[59]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  The Effect of Accuracy Motivation on Anchoring and Adjustment: Do People Adjust from Provided Anchors? , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  A. Evans,et al.  Trust and self-control: The moderating role of the default , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[61]  Mahesh Gopinath,et al.  The role of desires in sequential impulsive choices , 2005 .

[62]  J. Pettibone.  Testing the effect of time pressure on asymmetric dominance and compromise decoys in choice , 2012 .

[63]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[64]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.