The Respective Roles Of User Participation And User Involvement In Information System Implementation Success

Consistent with the conceptualizations of participation and involvement in psychology, organizational behavior, consumer behavior, and other disciplines, this paper redefines the participation construct to distinguish its. behavioral and psychological dimensions. "User participation" is defined as the observable behavior of information system users in the information system development process; "user involvement" as a need-based attitude orpsychological state of users with regard to that process and to the resultant information system; and "user engagement" as the set of user behaviors and attitudes toward information systems and their development. A field study was conducted in a $40 billion interstate bank during the installation and conversion of an information system. A questionnaire was developed, pre-tested, and validated for internal consistency, temporal stabfity, factorial validity, and multicollinearity. Path analysis was used for theory testing (i.e., model comparison). There was strong empirical evidence to support: (1) that user involvement is something distinct from, although associated wit4 user participation; (2) that this psychological state of user involvement may be more important than user participation in understanding information system success; (3) that the behavioral-attitudinal theory of information system success @e., that participation "causes" involvement which mediates the participation-success relationship) is superior to the behavioral theory (i.e., participation "causes" success); and (4) that user engagement during the installation phase is strongly associated with user satisfaction.

[1]  N. Melone.  A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research , 1990 .

[2]  James D. McKeen.  Successful Development Strategies for Business Application Systems , 1983, MIS Q..

[3]  Daniel W. Russell,et al.  Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. , 1988 .

[4]  Ann-Marie K. Baronas,et al.  Restoring a Sense of Control During Implementation: How User Involvement Leads to System Acceptance , 1988, MIS Q..

[5]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Key Recurrent Issues in the MIS Implementation Process , 1981, MIS Q..

[6]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  Attitudes, Association and Success of MIS: Some Empirical Results from Research in the Context of a Business Game , 1986, Computer/law journal.

[7]  Blake Ives,et al.  Chargeback Systems and User Involvement in Information Systems , 1982, MIS Q..

[8]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Principles of research in social psychology , 1973 .

[9]  Henry C. Lucas.  Performance evaluation and management of information services , 1972, DATB.

[10]  Gary Blau,et al.  Further exploring the meaning and measurement of career commitment , 1988 .

[11]  Blake Ives,et al.  An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction , 1986, CACM.

[12]  H. Kaiser.  The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[13]  C. R. Franz,et al.  Strategies for research on information systems in organizations. A critical analysis of research purpose and time frame , 1987 .

[14]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[15]  Gary Blau,et al.  A multiple study investigation of the dimensionality of job involvement , 1985 .

[16]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  The implementation of computer-based information systems: the respective roles of participation and involvement in information system success , 1990 .

[17]  Henri Barki,et al.  Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement , 1989, MIS Q..

[18]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement , 1974 .

[19]  Iris Vessey,et al.  The Effect of User Involvement on System Success: A Contingency Approach , 1988, MIS Q..

[20]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[21]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[22]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. , 1984, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[23]  S. Wright,et al.  The Theory of Path Coefficients a Reply to Niles's Criticism. , 1923, Genetics.

[24]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[25]  J. Miller.  Information systems effectiveness: the fit between business needs and system capabilities , 1989, ICIS '89.

[26]  R. F. Powers,et al.  MisProject Management: Myths, Opinions, and Reality , 1973 .

[27]  D. Hall,et al.  Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation , 1970 .

[28]  R. F. Powers,et al.  An empirical investigation of selected hypotheses related to the success of management information system projects , 1971 .

[29]  R. Zmud.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[30]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[31]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems in organization theory: a review , 1987 .

[32]  R. Kanungo.  The concepts of alienation and involvement revisited. , 1979 .

[33]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Some Cautions on the Measurement of User Information Satisfaction , 1989 .

[34]  A. Maslow.  Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[35]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[36]  C. R. Franz,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT, USER INVOLVEMENT, AND THE USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS* , 1986 .

[37]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A REGRESSION ESTIMATION METHOD FOR COLLINEAR PREDICTORS , 1975 .

[38]  Blake Ives,et al.  Measuring User Involvement in Information System Development , 1980, ICIS.

[39]  J. Zaichkowsky.  Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .