Life cycle assessment of densified wheat straw pellets in the Canadian Prairies

PurposeDensification, a process used to manufacture pellets in order to increase biomass bulk density, plays a crucial role in the economics of biomass utilization. The Canadian Prairies produce large quantities of agricultural residues each year, in particular wheat straw. This study performs life cycle assessment of wheat straw pellets by evaluating environmental effects of the entire pellet production system comprising feedstock production (on-farm wheat straw production), harvesting, baling, transportation, and the industrial processing involving drying, grinding, pelletizing, and packing in the densification plant. The effects of each process on the environmental performance of wheat straw pellets were investigated.MethodsThis study was conducted using LCA software and incorporating the Ecoinvent database supplemented with literature data for the Canadian Prairies. Wheat straw pellets manufactured from the densification plant are evaluated with respect to their use of resources and energy consumption. Environmental emissions associated with the agricultural processing and manufacturing systems are quantified. Sensitivity analysis is conducted to compare allocation methods and investigate the environmental impact of pelletizing and drying processes. The functional unit is defined as 1 kg wheat straw pellet.Results and discussionThe study quantified the environmental impact of producing wheat straw pellets in terms of global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication, ozone layer depletion, abiotic depletion, human toxicity, photochemical oxidation, fresh water aquatic ecotoxicity, and terrestrial ecotoxicity. Drying, pelletizing, and fertilizer are the main contributors to global warming, acidification, abiotic depletion, human toxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity, photochemical oxidation, and most of the other environmental impacts. Wheat seed has more impact on eutrophication. Transportation has an impact on ozone layer depletion, while grinding has an effect on freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity.ConclusionsThe environmental impact of materials and energy fluxes on producing wheat straw pellet in the Canadian Prairies is assessed. The effect of each processing step on the entire manufacturing process is described. Overall, drying and pelletizing processes contribute the most environmental burdens except eutrophication and terrestrial ecotoxicity which are dominated by agricultural fertilizer/seed utilization and harvesting. In order to mitigate the environmental impact of wheat straw pellet production, minimizing energy consumption and machinery burdens from the drying and pelletizing processes are the main intervention points for wheat straw densification. Fertilizer production and utilization are key variables in strategies to lower eutrophication and terrestrial ecotoxicity.

[1]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  ECONOMICS OF PRODUCING FUEL PELLETS FROM BIOMASS , 2006 .

[2]  James H. Clark,et al.  Introduction to Chemicals from Biomass , 2008 .

[3]  Ann Pa Development of British Columbia wood pellet life cycle inventory and its utilization in the evaluation of domestic pellet applications , 2010 .

[4]  W. Parton,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part I: calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES-LCA. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[6]  S. Sokhansanj,et al.  Cost benefit of biomass supply and pre-processing , 2006 .

[7]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach , 2006 .

[8]  A. Antón,et al.  LCA of poplar bioenergy system compared with Brassica carinata energy crop and natural gas in regional scenario , 2009 .

[9]  B. Dale,et al.  Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: Bioethanol and biodiesel , 2005 .

[10]  Heather L MacLean,et al.  Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[11]  Sara González-García,et al.  Comparative environmental performance of lignocellulosic ethanol from different feedstocks , 2010 .

[12]  X. Bi,et al.  A Streaml ined Life Cycle Analysis of Biomass Densification Process , 2005 .

[13]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of products : guide and backgrounds (Part 1) , 1992 .

[14]  G. Schoenau,et al.  Compaction characteristics of barley, canola, oat and wheat straw , 2009 .

[15]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  ISO 14041: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — goal and scope definition — inventory analysis , 1998 .

[16]  Staffan Melin,et al.  An environmental impact assessment of exported wood pellets from Canada to Europe. , 2009 .

[17]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of products : guide and backgrounds (Part 2) , 1992 .

[18]  Seungdo Kim,et al.  Life cycle assessment of corn grain and corn stover in the United States , 2009 .

[19]  A. Johnston,et al.  Wheat seeding rate for spread and distinct row seed placement with air seeders , 2001 .

[20]  Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[21]  S. Sokhansanj,et al.  Effects of compressive force, particle size and moisture content on mechanical properties of biomass pellets from grasses , 2006 .

[22]  Ken Campbell A Feasibility Study Guide for an Agricultural Biomass Pellet Company , 2007 .

[23]  A Process and Energy Analysis of Pelletizing Switchgrass Final Report , 2004 .

[24]  Eric Johnson Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2003 .

[25]  Christopher T. Wright,et al.  A Technical Review on Biomass Processing: Densification, Preprocessing, Modeling and Optimization , 2010 .

[26]  Anselm Eisentraut,et al.  Sustainable Production of Second-Generation Biofuels: Potential and Perspectives in Major Economies and Developing Countries , 2010 .

[27]  Phani Adapa,et al.  Pelleting characteristics of selected biomass with and without steam explosion pretreatment , 2010 .

[28]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Development of agri-pellet production cost and optimum size. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[29]  G. Schoenau,et al.  Grinding performance and physical properties of non-treated and steam exploded barley, canola, oat and wheat straw , 2011 .

[30]  James H. Clark,et al.  Introduction to Chemicals from Biomass: Clark/Introduction to Chemicals from Biomass , 2008 .

[31]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  Process conditions affecting the physical quality of alfalfa pellets , 1996 .

[32]  Satish Joshi,et al.  Biomass Supply for Biofuel Production: Estimates for the United States and Canada , 2009, BioResources.