A Novel Validation Approach for High-Density Surface EMG Decomposition in Motor Neuron Disease

This paper presents a novel two-source approach for validating the performance of high-density surface electromyogram (EMG) decomposition. The approach was developed taking advantage of surface EMG characteristics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). High-density surface EMG data from ALS patients can be divided to the sparse data set and the interference data set, with the former decomposed by expert visual inspection while the latter independently decomposed by the surface EMG decomposition algorithm. The agreement of the decomposition yields from the two data sets can be quantified for evaluating the surface EMG decomposition performance. The novel validation approach was performed for a recently developed method called automatic progressive FastICA peel-off (APFP) for high-density surface EMG decomposition. The APFP framework was used to automatically decompose high-density surface EMG signals recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of ALS subjects. The common motor units independently decomposed from the interference data set and the sparse data set demonstrated an average matching rate of 99.18% ± 1.11%. The characteristics of the ALS surface EMG also facilitate a step by step illustration of the APFP framework for high-density surface EMG decomposition. The novel approach presented in this paper can supplement conventional two-source validation for accuracy assessment of decomposed motor units from experimental signals, which is essential for development of surface EMG decomposition methods.

[1]  Sofiane Boudaoud,et al.  Fast generation model of high density surface EMG signals in a cylindrical conductor volume , 2016, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[2]  W. Rymer,et al.  Accuracy assessment of a surface electromyogram decomposition system in human first dorsal interosseus muscle , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[4]  Gea Drost,et al.  Clinical applications of high-density surface EMG: a systematic review. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[5]  Ze Wang Fixed-point algorithms for constrained ICA and their applications in fMRI data analysis. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[7]  Sanjeev D Nandedkar,et al.  Models and simulations in electromyography , 2002, Muscle & nerve. Supplement.

[8]  Bert U Kleine,et al.  Using two-dimensional spatial information in decomposition of surface EMG signals. , 2007, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[9]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  Simulation of Intramuscular EMG Signals Detected Using Implantable Myoelectric Sensors (IMES) , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  R. Merletti,et al.  Accuracy assessment of CKC high-density surface EMG decomposition in biceps femoris muscle , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  D. Farina,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Accuracy in the Identification of Motor Unit Spike Trains From High-Density Surface EMG , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Advances in surface EMG: recent progress in detection and processing techniques. , 2010, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[13]  Yingchun Zhang,et al.  Surface EMG Decomposition Based on K-means Clustering and Convolution Kernel Compensation , 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[14]  D. Goodin,et al.  Ovid: Pullman: Neurology, Volume 55(2).July 25, 2000.171-177 , 2006 .

[15]  Damjan Zazula,et al.  Gradient Convolution Kernel Compensation Applied to Surface Electromyograms , 2007, ICA.

[16]  Damjan Zazula,et al.  Multichannel Blind Source Separation Using Convolution Kernel Compensation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Multichannel surface EMG: Basic aspects and clinical utility , 2003, Muscle & nerve.

[18]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation , 2011, ArXiv.

[19]  Hideo Nakamura,et al.  The application of independent component analysis to the multi-channel surface electromyographic signals for separation of motor unit action potential trains: part I-measuring techniques. , 2004, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[20]  Ping Zhou,et al.  A Novel Framework Based on FastICA for High Density Surface EMG Decomposition , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  K. C. McGill,et al.  Surface electromyogram signal modelling , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[22]  Carlo J De Luca,et al.  Decomposition of indwelling EMG signals. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[23]  B Mambrito,et al.  A technique for the detection, decomposition and analysis of the EMG signal. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  M. Swash,et al.  El Escorial revisited: Revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2000, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other motor neuron disorders : official publication of the World Federation of Neurology, Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases.

[25]  D. Farina,et al.  Multi-channel intramuscular and surface EMG decomposition by convolutive blind source separation , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[26]  D F Stegeman,et al.  A thin, flexible multielectrode grid for high-density surface EMG. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[27]  D Stashuk,et al.  EMG signal decomposition: how can it be accomplished and used? , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[28]  A J Gitter,et al.  AAEM practice topics: Technology assessment: The use of surface EMG in the diagnosis and treatment of nerve and muscle disorders , 1996, Muscle & nerve.

[29]  D. Farina,et al.  Estimating motor unit discharge patterns from high-density surface electromyogram , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Automatic Implementation of Progressive FastICA Peel-Off for High Density Surface EMG Decomposition , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[31]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Neighbor number, valley seeking and clustering , 2007, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[32]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Progressive FastICA Peel-Off and Convolution Kernel Compensation Demonstrate High Agreement for High Density Surface EMG Decomposition , 2016, Neural plasticity.

[33]  M. Swash,et al.  Electrodiagnostic criteria for diagnosis of ALS , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  R. Okuno,et al.  A decomposition algorithm for surface electrode-array electromyogram , 2005, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[35]  Hossein Parsaei,et al.  Intramuscular EMG signal decomposition. , 2010, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[36]  Hideo Nakamura,et al.  The application of independent component analysis to the multi-channel surface electromyographic signals for separation of motor unit action potential trains: part II-modelling interpretation. , 2004, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[37]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  EMGLAB: An interactive EMG decomposition program , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.