The Development of Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Virological response to Combination HIV Therapy

Introduction When used in combination, antiretroviral drugs are highly effective for suppressing HIV replication. Nevertheless, treatment failure commonly occurs and is generally associated with viral drug resistance. The choice of an alternative regimen may be guided by a drug-resistance test. However, interpretation of resistance from genotypic data poses a major challenge. Methods As an alternative to current interpretation systems, we have developed artificial neural network (ANN) models to predict virological response to combination therapy from HIV genotype and other clinical information. Results ANN models trained with genotype, baseline viral load and time to follow-up viral load (1,154 treatment change episodes from multiple clinics), produced predictions of virological response that were highly significantly correlated with actual responses (r2=0.53; P<0.00001) using independent test data from clinics that contributed training data. Augmented models, trained with the additional variables of baseline CD4+ T-cell count and four treatment history variables, were more accurate, explaining 69% of the variance in virological response. Models trained with the full input dataset, but only those data involving highly active antiretroviral therapy (three or more full-dose antiretroviral drugs in combination), performed at an intermediate level, explaining 61% of the variance. The augmented models performed less well when tested with data from unfamiliar clinics that had not contributed data to the training dataset, explaining 46% of the variance in response. Conclusion These data indicate that ANN models can be quite accurate predictors of virological response to HIV therapy even for patients from unfamiliar clinics. ANN models therefore warrant further development as a potential tool to aid treatment selection.

[1]  S. Agatonovic-Kustrin,et al.  Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research. , 2000, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[2]  Victoria A Johnson,et al.  Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1: 2003 recommendations of an International AIDS Society-USA Panel. , 2003, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[3]  B. Larder,et al.  Enhanced prediction of lopinavir resistance from genotype by use of artificial neural networks. , 2003, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[4]  P. Narciso,et al.  Variable prediction of antiretroviral treatment outcome by different systems for interpreting genotypic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance. , 2003, Journal of Infectious Diseases.

[5]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Geno2pheno: estimating phenotypic drug resistance from HIV-1 genotypes , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  V. Soriano,et al.  Correlation between rules-based interpretation and virtual phenotype interpretation of HIV-1 genotypes for predicting drug resistance in HIV-infected individuals. , 2004, Journal of virological methods.

[7]  W Preiser,et al.  Variety of interpretation systems for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genotyping: confirmatory information or additional confusion? , 2003, Current drug targets. Infectious disorders.

[8]  F. Pociot,et al.  Novel analytical methods applied to type 1 diabetes genome-scan data. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  A. Aceti,et al.  Genotypic resistance tests in the management of the HIV-infected patient at virological failure. , 2003, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum.

[10]  R. Samudrala,et al.  Simple Linear Model Provides Highly Accurate Genotypic Predictions of HIV-1 Drug Resistance , 2003, Antiviral therapy.

[11]  Richard A. Rode,et al.  Identification of Genotypic Changes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease That Correlate with Reduced Susceptibility to the Protease Inhibitor Lopinavir among Viral Isolates from Protease Inhibitor-Experienced Patients , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[12]  Ben S. Gerber,et al.  Use of genetic algorithms for neural networks to predict community-acquired pneumonia , 2004, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[13]  JD Lundgren,et al.  Updated European Recommendations for the Clinical Use of HIV Drug Resistance Testing , 2004, Antiviral therapy.

[14]  B. Clotet,et al.  Clinical management of treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients with the fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide: consensus recommendations , 2004, AIDS.

[15]  D. Katzenstein,et al.  Weighted phenotypic susceptibility scores are predictive of the HIV-1 RNA response in protease inhibitor-experienced HIV-1-infected subjects. , 2004, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[16]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Data and text mining Computational methods for the design of effective therapies against drug resistant HIV strains , 2005 .

[17]  C. Tinelli,et al.  Comparison between rules-based human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genotype interpretations and real or virtual phenotype: concordance analysis and correlation with clinical outcome in heavily treated patients. , 2003, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[18]  Victor DeGruttola,et al.  Clinically Validated Genotype Analysis: Guiding Principles and Statistical Concerns , 2004, Antiviral therapy.

[19]  S. Staszewski,et al.  Comparison of Nine Resistance Interpretation Systems for HIV-1 Genotyping , 2002, Antiviral therapy.

[20]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Diversity and complexity of HIV-1 drug resistance: A bioinformatics approach to predicting phenotype from genotype , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Elie Bienenstock,et al.  Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma , 1992, Neural Computation.

[22]  Chen-Khong Tham,et al.  Predicting Risk of Coronary Artery Disease from Dna Microarray-based Genotyping Using Neural Networks and Other Statistical Analysis Tool , 2003, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..

[23]  L. Sandvik,et al.  An algorithm‐based genotypic resistance score is associated with clinical outcome in HIV‐1‐infected adults on antiretroviral therapy , 2004, HIV medicine.

[24]  A. Kelleher,et al.  A Randomised Trial Comparing Genotypic and Virtual Phenotypic Interpretation of HIV Drug Resistance: The CREST Study , 2006, PLoS clinical trials.

[25]  S. Deeks,et al.  Treatment of antiretroviral-drug-resistant HIV-1 infection , 2003, The Lancet.