Development of Antisnake Defenses in California Ground Squirrels (Spermophilus Beecheyi): I. Behavioral and Immunological Relationships

The development of antisnake behavioral and immunological defenses was investigated in laboratory born California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) from an area in California where Northern Pacific rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis oreganus) and Pacific gopher snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus catenifer) are abundant. Previous studies have shown that adult ground squirrels from this area possess innate physiological resistance to rattlesnake venom while pups are highly vulnerable to predation from snakes. Pups from other areas are known to exhibit snake recognition and adult-like antisnake behaviors on first encounter, a finding that prompted further study of pups from this area. The present study had four objectives: 1) to determine if inexperienced pups can distinguish rattlesnakes from gopher snakes, 2) to determine what role mothers play in shaping their pups' behavior during their first encounters with snakes, 3) to determine if maturational factors affect the expression of antisnake behaviors, and 4) to determine if maturational factors affect rattlesnake venom resistance, especially during the first weeks of life. Two groups of 63-70 day-old pups were studied during their first encounters with both a rattlesnake and a gopher snake. The snakes were presented separately in a wire-screened compartment positioned in the center of the experiment room containing sand substratum. Pups in this setting were either alone or with their mothers during 5-min encounters with the snakes, which were video taped from an overhead mirror. Two years later, pups which had previously engaged the snakes with their mothers were retested with the same snakes as adults and their behavior was compared to that of the earlier group of pups encountering the snakes alone. In another group of pups, radioimmunoassays of serum-to-venom binding examined changes in venom resistance at 14, 30, 48, and 80 days of age. The results indicated that pups do indeed differentiate rattlesnakes from gopher snakes irrespective of whether the mother is present or absent as inferred from the greater time that they spent near the rattlesnake. When the mothers were present, pups spent much less time investigating the rattlesnake or gopher snake closely as compared with the condition in which pups were alone. Except for displacing pups interacting with the snakes at close range, which could theoretically reduce the probability of pup injury, mothers exhibited very little overt protection of pups. Pups and adults behaved similarly when they engaged the snakes as evinced by their close-range investigative behavior, substrate throwing, and tail-flagging activity with the exception that adults were less vigilant in monitoring the snake's activity from anywhere in the experiment room. Analysis of developmental changes in venom resistance revealed that serum-to-venom binding achieves adult levels at 30 days of age which is about 15 days prior to burrow emergence. Despite adult serum-to-venom binding levels, pups are vulnerable to envenomation due to their reduced body mass and serum volume available to neutralize rattlesnake venom. From an over-all perspective, recently emerged ground squirrel pups from a population in which adults are highly resistant to rattlesnake venom are vulnerable to snake predation. Yet, enigmatically, they exhibit adult-like patterns of antisnake behaviors that are very risky, such as close-range investigation and substrate throwing. Tail flagging at the pup stage of development is more easily interpretable as providing some protection from snakes because it attracts the mother's attention and that of nearby adults who are likely to intervene. We interpret the early appearance in pups of risky adult-like investigative and snake-harassment behaviors as a by-product of epigenetic processes aimed at older, less vulnerable stages of development in which these behaviors are likely to have greater defensive utility.

[1]  D. H. Owings,et al.  Snake‐directed Behavior by Snake Naive and Experienced California Ground Squirrels in a Simulated Burrow , 1978, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie.

[2]  H. Fitch,et al.  Ecology of the California Ground Squirrel on Grazing Lands , 1948 .

[3]  M. D. Bryant Phylogeny of Nearctic Sciuridae , 1945 .

[4]  L. M. Klauber,et al.  Rattlesnakes : their habits, life histories, and influence on mankind , 1957 .

[5]  J. Pearn,et al.  The use of experimental models to study the biting habits of Australian snakes in both “defensive” and “hunting” bites , 1983 .

[6]  Donald H. Owings,et al.  Snake Mobbing By California Ground Squirrels: Adaptive Variation and Ontogeny , 1977 .

[7]  F. H. Pough,et al.  The effect of rattlesnake venom on digestion of prey. , 1979, Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology.

[8]  J. Fulton,et al.  A Textbook of Physiology. , 1956 .

[9]  H. Fitch,et al.  Feeding Habits of the Pacific Rattlesnake , 1946 .

[10]  S. Mineka,et al.  Social learning and the acquisition of snake fear in monkeys. , 1988 .

[11]  R. G. Coss,et al.  Delayed plasticity of an instinct: recognition and avoidance of 2 facing eyes by the jewel fish. , 1979, Developmental psychobiology.

[12]  R. Bolles,et al.  On the Ability of Prey to Recognize Predators , 1980 .

[13]  Donald H. Owings,et al.  The Meaning of the Sound of Rattling By Rattlesnakes To California Ground Squirrels , 1978 .

[14]  J. H. Wright,et al.  Late-Quaternary Environments of the United States , 1983 .

[15]  E. Mayr,et al.  Behavior programs and evolutionary strategies. , 1974, American scientist.

[16]  H. Fitch,et al.  Study of Snake Populations in Central California , 1949 .

[17]  C. H. Merriam The California ground squirrel. , 2022 .

[18]  R. Hinde Factors governing the changes in strength of a partially inborn response, as shown by the mobbing behaviour of the chaffinch (Fringilla coelehs) II. The waning of the response , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[19]  F. David,et al.  Snake Species Discrimination and the Role of Olfactory Cues in the Snake-Directed Behavior of the California Ground Squirrel , 1978 .

[20]  G. Horn,et al.  Development of filial preferences in dark-reared chicks , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  S. Sweet Geographic Variation, Convergent Crypsis and Mimicry in Gopher Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus) and Western Rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis) , 1985 .

[22]  E. Benjamini,et al.  Resistance of California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) to the venom of the northern Pacific rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis oreganus): a study of adaptive variation. , 1987, Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology.