A brief survey of different statistics for detecting multiplicative faults in multivariate statistical process monitoring

The recent explosion in different statistics for fault detection has meant that the practitioner is faced with the unenviable job of determining which to use in a given situation. Thus, this paper seeks to investigate the different test statistics that can be applied to detect multiplicative faults for multivariate Gaussian-distributed processes in order to provide the practitioner with some guidance. Three groups of methods are: traditional methods (e.g., T2 and Q statistics) and their extensions; the Wishart distribution-based methods; and those methods that are created in information and communication fields to describe the characteristics of measurement variance and covariance (e.g., mutual information and Kullback-Leibler divergence). Then, greater details on their interconnections and comparisons are presented and their performance for detecting multiplicative faults is evaluated and demonstrated using numerical simulations.

[1]  Michèle Basseville,et al.  Detection of abrupt changes: theory and application , 1993 .

[2]  Ch Hajiyev Tracy-Widom distribution based fault detection approach: application to aircraft sensor/actuator fault detection. , 2012, ISA transactions.

[3]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  A Survey of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Techniques—Part II: Fault Diagnosis With Knowledge-Based and Hybrid/Active Approaches , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  Canonical correlation analysis-based fault detection methods with application to alumina evaporation process , 2016 .

[5]  Arthur B. Yeh,et al.  Multivariate Control Charts for Monitoring Covariance Matrix: A Review , 2006 .

[6]  Xun Wang,et al.  Detecting abnormal situations using the Kullback-Leibler divergence , 2014, Autom..

[7]  Jose Luis Beltran Guerrero,et al.  Multivariate mutual information , 1994 .

[8]  Lei Xie,et al.  Fault detection in dynamic systems using the Kullback–Leibler divergence , 2015 .

[9]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  A Survey of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Techniques—Part I: Fault Diagnosis With Model-Based and Signal-Based Approaches , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond , 2003 .

[11]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  Data-driven Design of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-tolerant Control Systems , 2014 .

[12]  C. Tracy,et al.  The Distribution of the Largest Eigenvalue in the Gaussian Ensembles: β = 1, 2, 4 , 1997, solv-int/9707001.

[13]  Kaixiang Peng,et al.  A comparison and evaluation of key performance indicator-based multivariate statistics process monitoring approaches ☆ , 2015 .

[14]  N. R. Goodman The Distribution of the Determinant of a Complex Wishart Distributed Matrix , 1963 .

[15]  Uwe Kruger,et al.  Improved principal component monitoring using the local approach , 2007, Autom..

[16]  Leo H. Chiang,et al.  Process monitoring using causal map and multivariate statistics: fault detection and identification , 2003 .