The behavior of effective rate constants for bimolecular reactions in an asymptotic transport regime.

Previous research has shown that rate constants measured in batch tests (κ) may over-predict the amount of product formation when used in continuum models, and that these rate constants are often much greater than effective ones (κ(eff)) determined from upscaling studies. However, there is evidence that mixing is more important than the rate constants when using upscaled models. We use a numerical two-dimensional pore-scale porous medium with an approach similar to an experimental column test, and focus on the scenario of the displacement and mixing of two solutions with irreversible bimolecular reactions. Break-through curves of multiple cross-sectional averaged concentrations are analyzed for conservative and reactive transport, as well as the segregation of reactant species along the cross-sections. We compute effective parameters for the continuum scale in order to better understand the impact of using intrinsic rate constants in upscaled models. For a range of Damköhler numbers (Da), we compute effective reaction rate parameters and a reaction effectiveness factor; the latter is described by an empirical formula that depends on the Damköhler number and captures the upscaled system behavior. Our pore-scale results also confirm the segregation concept advanced by Kapoor et al. (1997). We find that for Da>1, κ(eff)<<κ, and yet the relative difference in total mass transformation between the pore-scale simulation and what is predicted by the upscaled continuum model using κ is about 10%. The explanation for this paradox is that the early transition of the regime from rate-limited to mixing-limited results in a model that is relatively insensitive to the rate constant because mixing controls the availability of reactants. Thus, the reaction-rate parameter used in the model has limited influence on the rate of product computed.

[1]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  Modeling bimolecular reactions and transport in porous media , 2008 .

[2]  Brian D. Wood,et al.  Effective reaction at a fluid–solid interface: Applications to biotransformation in porous media , 2007 .

[3]  Albert J. Valocchi,et al.  Pore‐scale simulation of dispersion and reaction along a transverse mixing zone in two‐dimensional porous media , 2007 .

[4]  Peter Grathwohl,et al.  Enhancement of dilution and transverse reactive mixing in porous media: experiments and model-based interpretation. , 2009, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[5]  C. Steefel,et al.  Reactive transport modeling: An essential tool and a new research approach for the Earth sciences , 2005 .

[6]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Macrotransport of a biologically reacting solute through porous media , 1996 .

[7]  M. V. Genuchten,et al.  A Comparative Study of Particle Tracking Techniques for Numerically Solving the Convection-Dispersion Equation , 1994 .

[8]  Howard Brenner,et al.  Dispersion and reaction in two‐dimensional model porous media , 1993 .

[9]  M. Rolle,et al.  Relevance of local compound‐specific transverse dispersion for conservative and reactive mixing in heterogeneous porous media , 2011 .

[10]  Sabine Attinger,et al.  Upscaling of the advection–diffusion–reaction equation with Monod reaction , 2009 .

[11]  M. Celia,et al.  Effects of mineral spatial distribution on reaction rates in porous media , 2007 .

[12]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Interpretation of column experiments of transport of solutes undergoing an irreversible bimolecular reaction using a continuum approximation , 2010 .

[13]  Marco Dentz,et al.  Concentration statistics for mixing-controlled reactive transport in random heterogeneous media. , 2008, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[14]  Irving Langmuir THE CONSTITUTION AND FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF SOLIDS AND LIQUIDS. PART I. SOLIDS. , 1916 .

[15]  Andreas Englert,et al.  Mixing, spreading and reaction in heterogeneous media: a brief review. , 2011, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[16]  M. Celia,et al.  Upscaling geochemical reaction rates using pore-scale network modeling , 2006 .

[17]  Jose Alvarez-Ramirez,et al.  On diffusion, dispersion and reaction in porous media , 2011 .

[18]  Sabine Attinger,et al.  Temporal behavior of a solute cloud in a heterogeneous porous medium: 1. Point‐like injection , 2000 .

[19]  M. Rolle,et al.  Evidence of compound-dependent hydrodynamic and mechanical transverse dispersion by multitracer laboratory experiments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Olaf A Cirpka,et al.  Measurement of mixing-controlled reactive transport in homogeneous porous media and its prediction from conservative tracer test data. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  Characterization of mixing and dilution in heterogeneous aquifers by means of local temporal moments , 2000 .

[22]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Effective reaction parameters for mixing controlled reactions in heterogeneous media , 2008 .

[23]  Charles J Werth,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of porous media structure on mixing-controlled reactions using pore-scale modeling and micromodel experiments. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Albert J. Valocchi,et al.  Comparison of continuum and pore-scale models of nutrient biodegradation under transverse mixing conditions , 2007 .

[25]  Timothy D. Scheibe,et al.  EFFECTS OF INCOMPLETE MIXING ON MULTICOMPONENT REACTIVE TRANSPORT , 2009 .

[26]  O. Cirpka Choice of dispersion coefficients in reactive transport calculations on smoothed fields. , 2002, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[27]  F. Molz,et al.  Internal inconsistencies in dispersion-dominated models that incorporate chemical and microbial kinetics , 1988 .

[28]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  Particle tracking model of bimolecular reactive transport in porous media , 2010 .

[29]  Kagan Tuncay,et al.  Scale dependence of reaction rates in porous media , 2006 .

[30]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Experimental Investigation and Pore-Scale Modeling Interpretation of Compound-Specific Transverse Dispersion in Porous Media , 2012, Transport in Porous Media.

[31]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Concentration fluctuations and dilution in aquifers , 1998 .

[32]  L. Gelhar,et al.  Bimolecular second‐order reactions in spatially varying flows: Segregation induced scale‐dependent transformation rates , 1997 .

[33]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  Coupling of mass transfer and reactive transport for nonlinear reactions in heterogeneous media , 2010 .

[34]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  The concept of the Dilution Index , 1994 .

[35]  C. Harvey,et al.  Reactive transport in porous media: a comparison of model prediction with laboratory visualization. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Vivek Kapoor,et al.  Experimental study of bimolecular reaction kinetics in porous media. , 2000 .