The Epistemological and Ethical Challenges of Archiving and Sharing Qualitative Data

This article identifies the epistemological and ethical problems that accompany the growing mandate to archive and share qualitative data. We call attention to the potential consequences of “shared access” for data that is premised on meaning-making and interpretation embedded in interactions between the researcher and those they study. We argue that context specificity and the co-constitutive processes of qualitative data production preclude the separation of “evidence” from the relations of its production that is required when evidence is archived for future use by others. Furthermore, we identify the ethical challenges that attend to ensuring the rights and confidentiality of those we engage and the particular concerns such engagement entails for vulnerable populations when securing informed consent for the use of data by future unknown researchers. Finally, we ask whether the claim for greater efficiencies and accountability of public access are appropriate for the co-constitutive character of qualitative evidence and what these demands portend for knowledge production. We conclude by calling for the development of protocols to guide researchers who are sensitive to these issues but must respond to calls to archive and share their data.

[1]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Big data and human geography , 2013 .

[2]  H. von Unger.  Reflexivity Beyond Regulations , 2016 .

[3]  J. Heaton.  Secondary analysis of qualitative data: an overview , 2008 .

[4]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Workshop on Scientific Foundations of Qualitative Research , 2004 .

[5]  G. King,et al.  Ensuring the Data-Rich Future of the Social Sciences , 2011, Science.

[6]  Odette Parry,et al.  Qualitative Data Preservation and Sharing in the Social Sciences: On Whose Philosophical Terms? , 2009 .

[7]  Libby Bishop.  RE-USING QUALITATIVE DATA: A LITTLE EVIDENCE, ON-GOING ISSUES AND MODEST REFLECTIONS 1 , 2014 .

[8]  Lorena Viñuela,et al.  Qualitative Data Archiving: Rewards and Challenges , 2010, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[9]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development , 2004, Data Sci. J..

[10]  C. Bates,et al.  Tobacco Explained...The truth about the tobacco industry...in its own words , 2004 .

[11]  D. Boyd,et al.  CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA , 2012 .

[12]  Susan Brown Eve,et al.  The New Language of Qualitative Method , 1998 .

[13]  Kristin C. Carbone-López,et al.  Revictimizing the Victims? , 2007, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[14]  Mark Coté,et al.  Hacking the social life of Big Data , 2015, Big Data Soc..

[15]  Dirk Pilat,et al.  OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding , 2007, Data Sci. J..

[16]  R. Emerson,et al.  Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Second Edition , 2011 .

[17]  Louise Corti,et al.  Re-using archived qualitative data – where, how, why? , 2007 .

[18]  A. Carusi,et al.  From data archive to ethical labyrinth , 2009 .

[19]  S. Irwin,et al.  Qualitative Secondary Analysis and Social Explanation , 2012 .

[20]  A. Goffman,et al.  On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City , 2014 .

[21]  Odette Parry,et al.  The Data are Out there, or are They? Implications for Archiving and Revisiting Qualitative Data , 1998 .

[22]  Odette Parry,et al.  Whose Data are They Anyway? , 2004 .

[23]  Odette Parry,et al.  Open Access Digital Data Sharing: Principles, Policies and Practices☆ , 2013 .

[24]  Niamh Moore,et al.  The Contexts of Context: Broadening Perspectives in the (Re)Use of Qualitative Data , 2006 .

[25]  R. Emerson,et al.  On the Uses of Members' Responses to Researchers' Accounts , 1988 .

[26]  James A. Holstein,et al.  Constructionist Impulses in Ethnographic Fieldwork , 2008 .

[27]  Michael Emmison,et al.  Qualitative Researchers’ Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing , 2009 .

[28]  D. Murthy.  Digital Ethnography , 2008 .

[29]  Charles Tilly,et al.  Explaining Social Processes , 2008 .

[30]  Elise M Smith,et al.  The Limits of Sharing: An Ethical Analysis of the Arguments For and Against the Sharing of Databases and Material Banks , 2011, Accountability in research.

[31]  Alison L. Antes,et al.  Examining Data Repository Guidelines for Qualitative Data Sharing , 2018, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[32]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Qualitative Data Archiving: Some Reflections on its Prospects and Problems , 1997 .

[33]  Libby Bishop,et al.  A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism , 2007 .

[34]  Z. Slavnic.  Towards Qualitative Data Preservation and Re-Use—Policy Trends and Academic Controversies in UK and Sweden , 2013 .

[35]  Louise Corti,et al.  Confidentiality and Informed Consent: Issues for Consideration in the Preservation of and Provision of Access to Qualitative Data Archives , 2000 .

[36]  H. Unger.  Reflexivity Beyond Regulations: Teaching Research Ethics and Qualitative Methods in Germany , 2016 .

[37]  Carol Marie Perry.  Archiving of publicly funded research data: A survey of Canadian researchers , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  Sidewalk , 2019, Acoustic Territories.

[39]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[40]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues , 2010 .

[41]  C. J. Churchill.  Ethnography as Translation , 2005 .

[42]  Joanna Bornat.  Recycling the Evidence: Different Approaches to the Reanalysis of Gerontological Data , 2005 .

[43]  Libby Bishop,et al.  Ethical Sharing and Reuse of Qualitative Data , 2009 .

[44]  Donna Harawy.  Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 2022, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.