Understanding the early stages of the innovation diffusion process: awareness, influence and communication networks

The themes of awareness and influence within the innovation diffusion process are addressed. The innovation diffusion process is typically represented as stages, yet awareness and influence are somewhat under-represented in the literature. Awareness and influence are situated within the contextual setting of individual actors but also within the broader institutional forces. Understanding how actors become aware of an innovation and then how their opinion is influenced is important for creating a more innovation-active UK construction sector. Social network analysis is proposed as one technique for mapping how awareness and influence occur and what they look like as a network. Empirical data are gathered using two modes of enquiry. This is done through a pilot study consisting of chartered professionals and then through a case study organization as it attempted to diffuse an innovation. The analysis demonstrates significant variations across actors’ awareness and influence networks. It is argued that social network analysis can complement other research methods in order to present a richer picture of how actors become aware of innovations and where they draw their influences regarding adopting innovations. In summarizing the findings, a framework for understanding awareness and influence associated with innovation within the UK construction sector is presented. Finally, with the UK construction sector continually being encouraged to be innovative, understanding and managing an actor’s awareness and influence network will be beneficial. The overarching conclusion thus describes the need not only to build research capacity in this area but also to push the boundaries related to the research methods employed.

[1]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Compensating for Innovation: Do Small Firms Offer High- Powered Incentives That Lure Talent and Motivate Effort? , 2004 .

[2]  A. Pettigrew WHAT IS A PROCESSUAL ANALYSIS. , 1997 .

[3]  Graeme D. Larsen,et al.  Horses for courses: relating innovation diffusion concepts to the stages of the diffusion process , 2005 .

[4]  S. Pryke Towards a social network theory of project governance , 2005 .

[5]  H. Leavitt Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[6]  Claire Bidart,et al.  Evolutions of personal networks and life events , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[7]  Janet McDonnell,et al.  Architect and user interaction: the spoken representation of form and functional meaning in early design conversations , 2006 .

[8]  Stephen Pryke,et al.  Analysing construction project coalitions: exploring the application of social network analysis , 2004 .

[9]  Scott Fernie,et al.  Making sense of supply chain management: a comparative study of aerospace and construction , 2005 .

[10]  Mike Bresnen,et al.  Understanding the diffusion and application of new management ideas in construction , 2001 .

[11]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Builders as sources of construction innovation , 1993 .

[12]  R. Burt Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure , 1985 .

[13]  E. Katz The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis , 1957 .

[14]  Swen Windahl,et al.  Using Communication Theory: An Introduction to Planned Communication , 1992 .

[15]  Kate Bishop,et al.  Business Growth and Innovation: The wider impact of rapidly growing firms in city regions , 2009 .

[16]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[17]  S. Pryke,et al.  Project governance: case studies on financial incentives , 2006 .

[18]  Scott Fernie,et al.  Dilettantes, discipline and discourse: requirements management for construction , 2003 .

[19]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Implementation of construction innovations , 2000 .

[20]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[21]  Leah A. Lievrouw,et al.  Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists , 1987 .

[22]  Julia Harkola Diffusion of construction technology : in a Japanese firm , 1995 .

[23]  Robert Cheng Huat Chia From Modern to Postmodern Organizational Analysis , 1995 .

[24]  Stephani K. A. Robson,et al.  First findings from the UK Innovation Survey 2009 , 2010 .

[25]  Raymond W. Smilor,et al.  The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship , 1986 .

[26]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[27]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Design management in building construction: from theory to practice , 2002 .

[28]  J. Harding,et al.  Sociometry, experimental method and the science of society: An approach to a new political orientation. , 1952 .

[29]  D. McQuail Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction , 1983 .

[30]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  Potential mechanisms for construction innovation , 1986 .

[31]  Charles Crichton,et al.  Interdependence and uncertainty : a study of the building industry , 2001 .

[32]  M. Archer Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory , 1996 .

[33]  Martin Sexton,et al.  INNOVATION IN SMALL CONSTRUCTION FIRMS: IS IT JUST A FRAME OF MIND? , 2004 .

[34]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[35]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[36]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Models of Construction Innovation , 1998 .

[37]  T. Albrecht,et al.  Communicating about innovation in networks of three U.S. organizations. , 1984 .

[38]  Stuart D. Green,et al.  Re-engineering construction: going against the grain , 2003 .

[39]  W. A. Wallace The influence of design team communication content upon the architectural decision making process in the pre contract design stages , 1987 .

[40]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Is the current theory of construction a hindrance to innovation? , 2001 .

[41]  Graeme D. Larsen,et al.  Competitive strategy revisited: contested concepts and dynamic capabilities , 2008 .

[42]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  Nicole Coviello,et al.  Integrating qualitative and quantitative techniques in network analysis , 2005 .

[44]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Innovation and users: virtual reality in the construction sector , 2003 .

[45]  E. R. Peay Connectedness in a general model for valued networks , 1980 .

[46]  Graeme D. Larsen,et al.  Contextualist Research: Iterating between Methods While Following an Empirically Grounded Approach , 2010 .

[47]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[48]  G. Currie,et al.  The Impact of Institutional Forces Upon Knowledge Sharing in the UK NHS: The Triumph of Professional Power and the Inconsistency of Policy , 2006 .

[49]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  A. Giddens Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[51]  Stephen Pryke,et al.  Network gaps and project success , 2010 .

[52]  S. Fleetwood Ontology in Organization and Management Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective , 2005 .

[53]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Thomas R. Hensley,et al.  Victims of Groupthink , 1986 .

[55]  Rod Gameson An investigation into the interaction between potential building clients and construction professionals , 1992 .

[56]  David Veshosky,et al.  MANAGING INNOVATION INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION FIRMS , 1998 .

[57]  Thomas W. Valente Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[58]  Celia Winkler,et al.  SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY , 2007 .

[59]  Richard Whittington,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL STRUCTURE AND THEORIES OF STRATEGIC CHOICE , 1988 .

[60]  P. Hamilton THE HERMENEUTIC TRADITION , 2003 .

[61]  Martin Sexton,et al.  Innovation in small construction knowledge‐intensive professional service firms: a case study of an architectural practice , 2006 .

[62]  Graeme D. Larsen Informal communication networks and the diffusion of innovations in UK construction projects: A research design , 2003 .

[63]  P. K. Chaturvedi,et al.  Communication Systems , 2002, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[64]  Filip Agneessens,et al.  Diversity in social support by role relations: A typology , 2006, Soc. Networks.

[65]  A. Akintoye,et al.  A survey of supply chain collaboration and management in the UK construction industry , 2000 .

[66]  Martin Loosemore,et al.  Social network analysis: using a quantitative tool within an interpretative context to explore the management of construction crises , 1998 .

[67]  Ramon J. Aldag,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict , 1980 .

[68]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[69]  Graeme D. Larsen,et al.  Partnering in flight: From being to becoming , 2008 .

[70]  Andreas Hartmann,et al.  Factors constituting the innovation adoption environment of public clients , 2008 .

[71]  H. Ibarra NETWORK CENTRALITY, POWER, AND INNOVATION INVOLVEMENT: DETERMINANTS OF TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ROLES , 1993 .

[72]  Scott Fernie,et al.  Change in construction: a critical perspective , 2006 .

[73]  Allan Luke,et al.  The Problem of Context , 1999 .

[74]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks , 1986 .

[75]  Panagiotis Mitropoulos,et al.  Forces driving adoption of new information technologies , 2000 .

[76]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Communication Systems , 1978 .

[77]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Realism and Semiosis , 2002 .

[78]  Frens Pries,et al.  Innovation in the construction industry: the dominant role of the environment , 1995 .