Sensitivity to interaural intensitive disparities: listeners' use of potential cues.

Thresholds for interaural intensitive disparities (IIDs) for a 500-Hz tone were measured in several stimulus conditions including those in which the use of intracranial position as a cue was effectively eliminated by roving the interaural temporal disparity of the stimuli. Removing position as a cue resulted in substantial degradation of sensitivity to IID. The overall patterning of the data suggests that threshold-IIDs measured in standard binaural paradigms that yield fused intracranial images reflect the use of changes in intracranial position. That is, comparisons among the data suggest that listeners' judgments depend upon binaural spatial cues and not on comparisons of the concomitant monaural increments and decrements in level, per se, that inevitably result from the imposition of IIDs.

[1]  W. Jesteadt,et al.  Comparison of monaural and binaural discrimination of intensity and frequency. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Barry Leshowitz,et al.  Measurement of the interaural amplitude threshold for a 500‐Hz tone , 1974 .

[3]  D W Grantham,et al.  Interaural intensity discrimination: insensitivity at 1000 Hz. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W. Gaik,et al.  Combined evaluation of interaural time and intensity differences: psychoacoustic results and computer modeling. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R Domnitz The interaural time jnd as a simultaneous function of interaural time and interaural amplitude. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  W. Kappauf,et al.  Regression interpretation of differences in time-intensity trading ratios obtained in studies of laterality using the method of adjustment. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Nuetzel,et al.  Difference thresholds for interaural intensity. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  K. Keen Preservation of constant loudness with interaural amplitude asymmetry. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  W. Yost,et al.  Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Constantine Trahiotis,et al.  Detection of interaural delay in high‐frequency noise , 1981 .

[11]  C. Trahiotis,et al.  Inter-individual differences in binaural detection of low-frequency or high-frequency tonal signals masked by narrow-band or broadband noise. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  William M Hartmann,et al.  Interaural level differences and the level-meter model. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  H S Colburn,et al.  Lateral position and interaural discrimination. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.