Using web standards, such as uniform resource identifiers (URIs), XML and HTTP, for naming and describing resources which are not information objects is the key difference between the Web as we know it today and the Semantic Web. Naming and interlinking this type of resources by HTTP URIs (instead of individual constants in a formal language) is the key feature which distinguishes traditional knowledge representation from web-scale knowledge representation. However, this use of URIs brought back attention to the old philosophical problem of identity and reference in a new form. In this paper, we analyze the new version of the problem, provide a formal model for dealing with it when interlinking knowledge on the Web, and argue for the need of a distinction between the use of URIs for describing and accessing resources, and the use of URIs for fixing the reference. We show that in the current practice of linking data these roles are not clearly distinguished, and that this fact may cause unwanted effects and prevent some basic forms of data integration. We also discuss the role of an entity name system as a potential piece of infrastructure for fixing the reference in the Semantic Web.
[1]
G. Frege.
Über Sinn und Bedeutung
,
1892
.
[2]
Aldo Gangemi,et al.
Towards an OWL Ontology for Identity on the Web
,
2006,
SWAP.
[3]
Keith S. Donnellan.
Reference and Definite Descriptions
,
1966
.
[4]
Valentina Presutti,et al.
An Ontology of Resources: Solving the Identity Crisis
,
2009,
ESWC.
[5]
J. O. Urmson,et al.
How to Do Things with Words@@@The William James Lectures
,
1963
.
[6]
Aldo Gangemi,et al.
A Grounded Ontology for Identity and Reference of Web Resources
,
2007,
I3.
[7]
Themis Palpanas,et al.
A Conceptual Model for a Web-Scale Entity Name System
,
2009,
ASWC.
[8]
Luciano Serafini,et al.
Querying the Web of Data: A Formal Approach
,
2009,
ASWC.
[9]
Saul A. Kripke,et al.
Naming and Necessity
,
1980
.