Enhancing Breast Cancer Risk Prediction by Incorporating Prior Images

Recently, deep learning models have shown the potential to predict breast cancer risk and enable targeted screening strategies, but current models do not consider the change in the breast over time. In this paper, we present a new method, PRIME+, for breast cancer risk prediction that leverages prior mammograms using a transformer decoder, outperforming a state-of-the-art risk prediction method that only uses mammograms from a single time point. We validate our approach on a dataset with 16,113 exams and further demonstrate that it effectively captures patterns of changes from prior mammograms, such as changes in breast density, resulting in improved short-term and long-term breast cancer risk prediction. Experimental results show that our model achieves a statistically significant improvement in performance over the state-of-the-art based model, with a C-index increase from 0.68 to 0.73 (p<0.05) on held-out test sets.

[1]  F. Au,et al.  Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2023, Radiology.

[2]  K. Czene,et al.  A risk model for digital breast tomosynthesis to predict breast cancer and guide clinical care , 2022, Science Translational Medicine.

[3]  Vinayak S. Ahluwalia,et al.  Artificial intelligence in mammographic phenotyping of breast cancer risk: a narrative review , 2022, Breast Cancer Research.

[4]  Renato F Caron,et al.  Multi-Institutional Validation of a Mammography-Based Breast Cancer Risk Model , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Kevin Smith,et al.  Toward robust mammography-based models for breast cancer risk , 2021, Science Translational Medicine.

[6]  S. Duffy,et al.  Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality (UK Age trial): final results of a randomised, controlled trial , 2020, The Lancet. Oncology.

[7]  Yue Liu,et al.  Decoupling Inherent Risk and Early Cancer Signs in Image-based Breast Cancer Risk Models , 2020, MICCAI.

[8]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Risk Models for Breast Cancer and Their Validation , 2019, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

[10]  Nan Wu,et al.  Screening Mammogram Classification with Prior Exams , 2019, ArXiv.

[11]  Uri Shaham,et al.  DeepSurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network , 2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[12]  Christoph I. Lee,et al.  Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening: Implications of Breast Density. , 2017, The Medical clinics of North America.

[13]  Lukasz Kaiser,et al.  Attention is All you Need , 2017, NIPS.

[14]  R. Kolamunnage-Dona,et al.  Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications , 2017, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[15]  Frank Hutter,et al.  SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restarts , 2016, ICLR.

[16]  John Kornak,et al.  Improving Screening Mammography Outcomes Through Comparison With Multiple Prior Mammograms. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[18]  Brandon D Gallas,et al.  Comparing two correlated C indices with right‐censored survival outcome: a one‐shot nonparametric approach , 2015, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  Mohd Hamid,et al.  Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool , 2014 .

[20]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. , 2013, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[21]  M. L. Borgne,et al.  Additional material , 2022, The Works of Graham Greene, Volume 3.

[22]  M. Pencina,et al.  On the C‐statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  M. Coleman,et al.  Cancer screening: evidence and practice in Europe 2008. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[24]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Use of prior mammograms in the classification of benign and malignant masses. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[25]  Stephen W Duffy,et al.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors , 2004, Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice.

[26]  David Gur,et al.  Optimal reference mammography: a comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examination. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[28]  EUROSCREENWorking Group,et al.  Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet , 2012 .

[29]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening. , 2007, Radiology.

[30]  Medical Advisory Secretariat Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis. , 2007, Ontario health technology assessment series.

[31]  A. Jemal,et al.  Breast Cancer Statistics , 2013 .