THEMIS satellite observations of hot flow anomalies at Earth's bow shock

Abstract. Hot flow anomalies (HFAs) at Earth's bow shock were identified in Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions During Substorms (THEMIS) satellite data from 2007 to 2009. The events were classified as young or mature and also as regular or spontaneous hot flow anomalies (SHFAs). The dataset has 17 young SHFAs, 49 mature SHFAs, 15 young HFAs, and 55 mature HFAs. They span a wide range of magnetic local times (MLTs) from approximately 7 to 16.5 MLT. The largest ratio of solar wind to HFA core density occurred near dusk and at larger distances from the bow shock. In this study, HFAs and SHFAs were observed up to 6.3 RE and 6.1 RE (Earth radii), respectively, upstream from the model bow shock. HFA–SHFA occurrence decreases with distance upstream from the bow shock. HFAs of the highest event core ion temperatures were not seen at the flanks. The ratio of HFA ion temperature increase to HFA electron temperature increase is highest around 12 MLT and slightly duskward. For SHFAs, (Tihfa∕Tisw)/(Tehfa∕Tesw) generally increased with distance from the bow shock. Both mature and young HFAs are more prevalent when there is an approximately radial interplanetary magnetic field. HFAs occur most preferentially for solar wind speeds from 550 to 600 km s−1. The correlation coefficient between the HFA increase in thermal energy density from solar wind values and the decrease in kinetic energy density from solar wind values is 0.62. SHFAs and HFAs do not show major differences in this study.

[1]  H. Zhang,et al.  Parametric dependencies of spontaneous hot flow anomalies , 2014 .

[2]  Q. Zong,et al.  Hot flow anomaly formation and evolution: Cluster observations , 2013 .

[3]  H. Zhang,et al.  Spontaneous hot flow anomalies at quasi‐parallel shocks: 1. Observations , 2013 .

[4]  H. Zhang,et al.  Spontaneous hot flow anomalies at quasi‐parallel shocks: 2. Hybrid simulations , 2013 .

[5]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  Polar UVI and THEMIS GMAG observations of the ionospheric response to a hot flow anomaly , 2011 .

[6]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms observations of a series of hot flow anomaly events , 2010 .

[7]  I. Dandouras,et al.  Study of hot flow anomalies using Cluster multi-spacecraft measurements , 2010, 1807.07371.

[8]  R. Abiad,et al.  The THEMIS ESA Plasma Instrument and In-flight Calibration , 2008 .

[9]  K. Glassmeier,et al.  THEMIS observations of a hot flow anomaly: Solar wind, magnetosheath, and ground‐based measurements , 2008 .

[10]  Werner Magnes,et al.  The THEMIS Fluxgate Magnetometer , 2008 .

[11]  Vassilis Angelopoulos,et al.  The THEMIS Mission , 2008 .

[12]  J. Slavin,et al.  Three‐dimensional position and shape of the bow shock and their variation with upstream Mach numbers and interplanetary magnetic field orientation , 2005 .

[13]  A. Szabo,et al.  Bow shock's geometry at the magnetospheric flanks , 2004 .

[14]  T. Horbury,et al.  Cluster observations of hot flow anomalies , 2004 .

[15]  David G. Sibeck,et al.  Comprehensive study of the magnetospheric response to a hot flow anomaly , 1999 .

[16]  R. Schunk,et al.  Field-aligned expansion of plasma clouds in the ionosphere , 1995 .

[17]  S. Schwartz.  Hot flow anomalies near the Earth's bow shock , 1995 .

[18]  M. Thomsen,et al.  Hybrid simulation of the formation of a hot flow anomaly , 1991 .

[19]  J. Gosling,et al.  Observational test of a hot flow anomaly formation mechanism. [high temperature plasma observed in solar wind and magnetosheath] , 1990 .

[20]  C. Russell,et al.  On the origin of hot diamagnetic cavities near the Earth's bow shock , 1988 .

[21]  C. Russell,et al.  Hot, diamagnetic cavities upstream from the Earth's bow shock , 1986 .

[22]  S. Schwartz,et al.  An active current sheet in the solar wind , 1985, Nature.