Predictability of early stages of primary succession in post-mining landscapes of Lower Lusatia, Germany

The predictability of early primary succession in post-mining landscapes of eastern Germany was studied at sites 5-70 yr following dumping. This chronosequence was investigated using indirect ordination methods. The position of the vegetation types in the ordination diagram was found not to infer any temporal sequence. Independent observations show that the change of vegetation type is slow and does not necessarily occur among types adjacent in the ordination diagram. Furthermore, direct ordination revealed that environ- mental parameters such as pH, the levels of available phos- phate and organic carbon as well as the age of the study sites do not significantly account for the variance. Instead, attention needs to be paid to the influence of spatial aspects and also what recultivation measures have been carried out. A detailed account of the vegetation dynamics of individual sample plots showed - depending on the respective vegetation type - diver- gence, convergence, and fluctuation at the smallest spatial scale. While the species richness of the sample plots remained more or less constant after initial colonization, mean vegeta- tion cover continuously increases with age, although some sites still remain free of vegetation after as long as 70 yr. No general trend in dominant life forms was indicated. A concep- tual model of early succession mechanisms is outlined and five basic mechanisms are identified (i.e. site availability, site suitability, availability of diaspores, strategies of colonizing species and biotic interactions). Their respective importance in three different stages of early succession is estimated and compared. The predictability of vegetation dynamics at each stage is rated differently.

[1]  Explanation and prediction in vegetation science , 1989 .

[2]  W. Cramer,et al.  The separation of fluctuation and long-term change in vegetation dynamics of a rising seashore , 1987 .

[3]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[4]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant Succession: Life History and Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[5]  A. G. Valk,et al.  Succession in Wetlands: A Gleasonian Appraoch , 1981 .

[6]  V. D. Valk,et al.  Establishment, colonization and persistence , 1992 .

[7]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[8]  F. Clements Scientific Books: Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 2009 .

[9]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The C-S-R model of primary plant strategies — origins, implications and tests , 1988 .

[10]  T. Czárán,et al.  Exploring plant community dynamics in abstract coenostate spaces , 1998 .

[11]  P. Grubb Plant Populations and Vegetation in Relation to Habitat, Disturbance and Competition: Problems of Generalization , 1985 .

[12]  B. Hahn,et al.  Biotische und abiotische Eigenschaften von Böden naturnaher Offenlandbereiche der Niederlausitzer Bergbaufolgelandschaft , 2000 .

[13]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Influence of edaphic factors on the spatial structure of inland halophytic communities: a case study in China , 1998 .

[14]  J. Connell,et al.  Mechanisms of Succession in Natural Communities and Their Role in Community Stability and Organization , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Keith Richards,et al.  Plant Recolonization and Vegetation Succession on the Krakatau Islands, Indonesia , 1989 .

[16]  I. M. Johnstone,et al.  PLANT INVASION WINDOWS: A TIME‐BASED CLASSIFICATION OF INVASION POTENTIAL , 1986 .

[17]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4) , 1998 .

[18]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Spontaneous Establishment of Woody Plants in Central European Derelict Sites and their Potential for Reclamation , 1994 .

[19]  J. Macmahon Ecosystems over time: Succession and other types of change , 1979 .

[20]  Colin J. Burrows,et al.  Processes of Vegetation Change , 1990, Springer Netherlands.

[21]  G. Wiegleb,et al.  Vegetation survey in the former brown coal mining area of eastern Germany by integrating remote sensing and ground‐based methods , 1998 .

[22]  R. Paine Food webs : linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure , 1980 .

[23]  M. Zobel,et al.  Change in pattern diversity during secondary succession in Estonian forests , 1993 .

[24]  P. Legendre,et al.  Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation , 1992 .

[25]  R. Primack,et al.  Dispersal Can Limit Local Plant Distribution , 1992 .

[26]  M. Pärtel,et al.  The dynamics of species richness in an experimentally restored calcareous grassland , 1996 .

[27]  Osvaldo E. Sala,et al.  Competition, facilitation, seed distribution and the origin of patches in a Patagonian steppe , 1994 .

[28]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities , 1997 .

[29]  R. Moral Early succession on lahars spawned by Mount St. Helens. , 1998 .

[30]  O. Vetaas Relationships between floristic gradients in a primary succession , 1997 .

[31]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[32]  Birgit Felinks Dynamik der Vegetationsentwicklung in den terrestrischen Offenlandbereichen der Bergbaufolgelandschaft , 2000 .

[33]  P. Poschlod,et al.  Dispersal of Plants in Fragmented Landscapes , 1996 .

[34]  M. Cannavacciuolo,et al.  Primary succession on glacier forelands in the subantarctic Kerguelen Islands , 1998 .

[35]  A. Grootjans,et al.  Mechanisms of vegetation succession: a review of concepts and perspectives , 1993 .

[36]  G. Wiegleb,et al.  Ecological Orientors: Pattern and Process of Succession in Relation to Ecological Orientors , 1998 .

[37]  C. Braak Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[38]  H. Gleason The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1926 .

[39]  Henry C. Cowles,et al.  The Ecological Relations of the Vegetation on the Sand Dunes of Lake Michigan [Continued] , 1899, Botanical Gazette.

[40]  A. Penttinen,et al.  Plant colonization of a bare peat surface: population changes and spatial patterns , 1992 .

[41]  V. Salonen Effects of artificial plant cover on plant colonization of a bare peat surface , 1992 .

[42]  S. Pickett,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity During Succession: A Cyclic Model of Invasion and Exclusion , 1991 .

[43]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[44]  Henry Chandler Cowles,et al.  The Ecological Relations of the Vegetation on the Sand Dunes of Lake Michigan [Continued] , 1899, Botanical Gazette.

[45]  Gerhard Wiegleb,et al.  Primary succession in post-mining landscapes of Lower Lusatia — chance or necessity , 2001 .

[46]  Rune Halvorsen Økland,et al.  Canonical Correspondence Analysis with variation partitioning: some comments and an application , 1994 .