Developing a technoself system to improve lifelong learning engagement

Lifelong learning exists today in the context of a cultural and societal shift to a knowledge-based, technology-enhanced, and rapidly-changing economy. It has a significant impact on people's lives and has become of vital importance with the emergence of new technologies that change how people communicate, collect information, and collaborate with others. The emerging technologies, such as social networking, interactive media and game technology, have expanded a new dimension of self - 'technoself driven by socio-technical innovations and taken an important step forward in lifelong learning through the Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL). The TEL encourages learners as producers to embed personalized knowledge and collective experience on individualized learning within professional practice. It becomes more personal and social than traditional lifelong learning, especially about the `learning as socially grounded' aspects. This paper studies the development of technoself system during lifelong learning and introduces technoself enhanced learning as a novel sociological framework of lifelong learning to couple the educational dimension with social dimension in order to enhance learner engagement by shaping personal learning focus and setting. We examine how people construct their own inquiry and learn from others, how people shift and adapt in these technoself-enhanced learning environments, and how learner engagement is improving as the involvement of learners as producers in lifelong learning. We further discuss the barriers and the positive and negative unintended consequences of using technology for lifelong learning.

[1]  T. Paulus,et al.  Using a social networking site for experiential learning: Appropriating, lurking, modeling and community building , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[2]  Jayfus T. Doswell,et al.  Augmented Learning: Context-Aware Mobile Augmented Reality Architecture for Learning , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06).

[3]  L. S. Vygotksy Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[4]  Kathryn Crawford,et al.  Vygotskian approaches in human development in the information era , 1996 .

[5]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[6]  F. Reid Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory , 1987 .

[7]  D DavisFred Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology , 1989 .

[8]  Diane Jass Ketelhut Eric Klopfer: Augmented Learning: Research and Design of Mobile Educational Games , 2010 .

[9]  J. T. Doswell Augmented Learning: Context-Aware Mobile Augmented Reality Architecture for Learning , 2006 .

[10]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[11]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  The Evolving Self: A Psychology for the Third Millennium. , 2016 .

[12]  Lori B. Holcomb,et al.  The Use of Alternative Social Networking Sites in Higher Educational Settings: A Case Study of the E-Learning Benefits of Ning in Education , 2010 .

[13]  Moez Limayem,et al.  3D Social Virtual Worlds: Research Issues and Challenges , 2008, IEEE Internet Computing.

[14]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[15]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[16]  S. Thompson Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[17]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .

[18]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[19]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Learning: Evidence-based Improvement , 2015, L@S.

[20]  J. Myers,et al.  Life-long learning and self-assessment. , 2012, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.