The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations

In two experiments, we evaluated the ability of human observers to make use of second-order temporal relations across three or more views of an apparent motion sequence for the perceptual analysis of three-dimensional form. Ratings of perceived rigidity were obtained in Experiment 1 for objects rotating in depth that were simultaneously subjected to sinusoidal affine stretching transformations along the line of sight or in a direction parallel to the image plane. Such transformations are theoretically interesting because they cannot be detected by analyses that are restricted to first-order temporal relations (i.e., two views), but they can be detected by more conventional analyses of structure from motion in which second-order temporal relations over three or more views are used. The current results show that human observers can perceive stretching transformations of a rotating 3-D object in a direction parallel to the image plane but that they fail to perceive stretching transformations along the line of sight. This result suggests that human observers can make use of some limited second-order temporal information. This finding was confirmed in Experiment 2, in which we investigated the effects of several specific optical consequences of sinusoidal stretching transformations applied in different directions. The results indicate that observers may be sensitive to the sign of acceleration, but that. they cannot make use of the precise magnitude of second-order relations necessary to recover euclidean metric structure.

[1]  D D Hoffman,et al.  Structure from two orthographic views of rigid motion. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  M. Landy,et al.  Kinetic depth effect and optic flow—I. 3D shape from Fourier motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[3]  J S Lappin,et al.  Accurate visual measurement of three-dimensional moving patterns. , 1983, Science.

[4]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[5]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Affine structure from motion. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  W. Miles Movement Interpretations of the Silhouette of a Revolving Fan , 1931 .

[7]  J T Todd,et al.  The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  S. Ullman,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion , 1977 .

[10]  Ellen C. Hildreth,et al.  The perceptual buildup of three-dimensional structure from motion , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  M. Braunstein Depth perception in rotating dot patterns: effects of numerosity and perspective. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  Green Bf Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect. , 1961 .

[13]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: Minimum points and views , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  J S Lappin,et al.  Planar motion permits perception of metric structure in stereopsis , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  B. Green Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  J T Todd,et al.  Apparent rotation in three-dimensional space: Effects of temporal, spatial, and structural factors , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Motion and Structure from Orthographic Projections , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  J. Todd Visual information about rigid and nonrigid motion: a geometric analysis. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  W. Metzger Beobachtungen über phänomenale Identität , 1934 .

[20]  J. Gibson,et al.  Motion parallax as a determinant of perceived depth. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  J. Gibson,et al.  Continuous perspective transformations and the perception of rigid motion. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Minimum points and views for the recovery of three-dimensional structure. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  J T Todd,et al.  The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  James T. Todd Visual information about rigid and nonrigid motion: A geometric analysis. , 1982 .

[25]  Gunnar Johansson,et al.  Perceived rotary motion from changes in a straight line , 1968 .

[26]  J T Todd,et al.  Perception of structure from motion: is projective correspondence of moving elements a necessary condition? , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  G. Johansson PERCEPTION OF MOTION AND CHANGING FORM: A study of visual perception from continuous transformations of a solid angle of light at the eye , 1964 .